A subscription service that delivers outcomes that you can put into practice immediately
GigaOm Subscription services offer practical and actionable advice that you can put into practice right away for your product roadmap, trends, messaging, positioning, competitive intelligence, and continued education.
How we do it
What GigaOm provides across 1 cloud product: An example:
architecture & engineering
Sample GigaOm Team
Pricing and packaging
Cost effective for teams, scales based on need.
Advisory research subscription
Client employees within 1 product unit will receive access to 10 licenses for Gigaom Research—and may attend advisory calls.
Get a free report
HELPING BRANDS GROW
Large Energy Company
Leader in emerging cloud and data technologies. I like the radar and key criteria reports you have produced. Lots of information presented in a ‘easy to consume’ format
“GigaOm’s Radar is distinctive – it’s looking at the product attributes rather than the market share of a company. Market share is a ‘rear view’ metric – and isn’t very useful given the pace of technological change.”
“Digital native with top experts on new technologies like Object storage, Kubernetes, AIOps.”
Large Insurance Company
The GigaOm reports have a palpable, solid bedrock that is based on tech and delivered by people that know what they’re talking about. They give me insights about the current state of the market and where each vendor/product is trending towards.
GigaOm ismore cost effective than Gartner
more cost effective than Gartner
Frequently asked questions
Yes, please contact us to find out more about our methodology and research for the GigaBrief processes.
GigaBriefs are typically publish 2-4 weeks after the fact check deadline.
Typically, you will receive correspondence for the GigaBrief factual review about 3 to 4 weeks after the briefings have wrapped up. In this way, you can easily increase your engagement with the customers and turn them into loyal customers.
We will work with our sales and analyst teams to identify other reports your company is featured in, and will endeavor to share approximate timelines for fact check.
1. Largely the answer is down to table stakes, i.e. the set of things a tech solution category does. Relevance is defined by functionality, not market presence. In this way we’re following the same steps as a technology buyer and creating a level playing field (as best we can) for evaluation.
2. This means we’re looking from the perspective of the technical buyer, not the marketing-driven seller. Just because a vendor doesn’t come up against certain companies in sales, that doesn’t mean they aren’t relevant, particularly given how fast markets can change.
3. To help make things clear for participants, we’re (planning on) creating a set of inclusion criteria for each report. We also welcome conversations with vendors about what categories they feel they do play in, as part of how we put our research schedule together.