Gigabriefs
Provide a snapshot for CxOs to understand your Tech solution
Help CxOs understand the value proposition of your tech solution, along with key benefits for quick insight into a 30/60/90 days plan to operationalize.
Gigabrief report benefits
Quickly understand what your tech does
Rapidly help CxOs identify new technologies to adopt and gain deeper insight with the value proposition to your business.
Gigabrief report benefits
Insight into a 30/60/90 day plan
Incorporate strategic assessment and level setting, pursue business and IT buy-in, establish training and metrics
Clearly identify costs and benefits
Up to 5x faster to create applications than traditional development. Learn how to cut costs for some projects by up to 50%.
How GigaBriefs help you make the right decision.
Understand the value proposition of a tech solution, along with key benefits and the level of urgency for adoption. Appreciate the risk level for adoption and leverage quick insight into a 30/60/90 days plan to operationalize.
Gain an executive advantage with GigaOm’s executive briefs, summarizing emerging technology.
Feel confident in your ability to deliver short analyses of emerging technology trends to your senior leadership team.
Helping Practitioners and Vendors Succeed
MEDIA PARTNERS
GigaOm is 90% more cost effective than Gartner
GigaOm is
90%
more cost effective than Gartner
Frequently asked GigaBrief questions
Yes, please contact us to find out more about our methodology and research for the GigaBrief processes.
GigaBriefs are typically publish 2-4 weeks after the fact check deadline.
Typically, you will receive correspondence for the GigaBrief factual review about 3 to 4 weeks after the briefings have wrapped up. In this way, you can easily increase your engagement with the customers and turn them into loyal customers.
We will work with our sales and analyst teams to identify other reports your company is featured in, and will endeavor to share approximate timelines for fact check.
1. Largely the answer is down to table stakes, i.e. the set of things a tech solution category does. Relevance is defined by functionality, not market presence. In this way we’re following the same steps as a technology buyer and creating a level playing field (as best we can) for evaluation.
2. This means we’re looking from the perspective of the technical buyer, not the marketing-driven seller. Just because a vendor doesn’t come up against certain companies in sales, that doesn’t mean they aren’t relevant, particularly given how fast markets can change.
3. To help make things clear for participants, we’re (planning on) creating a set of inclusion criteria for each report. We also welcome conversations with vendors about what categories they feel they do play in, as part of how we put our research schedule together.
