Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends
Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Rackspace is going to stop distinguishing between the money it makes from public cloud and what it derives from “dedicated” cloud, a category that encompasses a bunch of options.
Well that’s one way to sidestep the whole “is private cloud dead?” debate.
The move may show a fanatical obsession on managed cloud or indicate that Rackspace is giving up on public cloud where leader, [company]Amazon[/company] Web Services, is contending with growing threats from [company]Microsoft[/company] Azure and[company] Google[/company] Cloud Platform. Or both. Tomato, tomahto.
On the fourth quarter earnings call Tuesday, CEO Taylor Rhodes reiterated that “managed cloud” versus the wild-west of unmanaged public cloud is where [company]Rackspace[/company] is focused. And its financial earnings will reflect that going forward. No longer will Rackspace put its public cloud revenue in one bucket and combined private cloud, managed hosting, managed services all into the dedicated cloud revenue bucket.
In an interview after the call, Rhodes acknowledged that most new “greenfield” applications will be built for public cloud deployment over a ten-year time frame. But, there are also many legacy applications that will stay either stay where they are or move to a single-tenant private cloud situation. And there is demand for well-managed specialized clouds for different workloads, Rhodes said.
The accounting changes were made in part to keep Rackspace sales people from selling the wrong cloud to the wrong customer, he said. “We have a dilemma in that we switched from a horizontal position in cloud … to [cloud for] particular workloads. We want to be the best at supporting Oracle commerce and we will be the best at managing that with a highly opinionated point of view on whether Oracle commerce should be a single-tenant or multi-tenant implementation.” I’m guessing that single-tenant will be the answer here.
Rackspace sales people shouldn’t be rewarded “perversely” for selling multi-tenant when single tenant is best, he said.
Overall, the company posted net income of 26 cents per share, surpassing consensus estimates of 19 cents per share, but it missed on revenue, logging $472.2 million where analysts expected $474 million.