Flipboard swims against the tide by launching a website

5 Comments

If there’s one word that sums up where most media entities are focused for the future, it’s “mobile” — almost every news service and website is looking to mobile because that’s where the younger users are, and therefore that’s where the growth is. In fact, NowThis just finished getting rid of its website altogether because it said there was no purpose in having one.

Flipboard, however, is doing the exact opposite: On Tuesday, the company said it is finally embracing the web by launching a full-featured site that not only reproduces what the app offers, but builds on top of it.

So why is Flipboard going in the opposite direction to everyone else? Co-founder and CEO Mike McCue said there’s a simple answer, which is that Flipboard was mobile before almost anyone else — in fact, the app was one of the first to show the real possibilities of the iPad when it launched in 2010. But what Flipboard has been missing, he said, was a way to tie together the web and mobile easily. The original website the company debuted in 2013 allowed users to read articles, but didn’t let them do much else.

Lessons from mobile

Flipboard’s new web version solves that problem, McCue said: it allows users to not only read but to create curated magazines and add to them, to dive into specific topics based on items others have shared, and to reproduce all of the behavior they have gotten used to within the app. And in a sense, says the Flipboard CEO, the web version has been in the works for almost as long as the company itself has been around:

3-magazine-the bloom - on screen

McCue also said that the new web version of Flipboard has a number of features that the news-reading platform wouldn’t have been able to build if it wasn’t for years of developing the mobile app and learning how to sort and format content. So for example, Flipboard can recognize when the content it is displaying would look better as a photo gallery, and resize the images for full-width, or figure out where to put the headline text. In effect, it is able to create magazine-style layouts for content on the fly.

Flipboard’s evolution

The Flipboard web version has been in the works for about two years, McCue said, and one of the main reasons for it was to give users who wanted to interact with Flipboard on their desktop a full-fledged interface for doing so. The other driving force behind the offering, he said, was a desire to take advantage of the screen size and horsepower of a desktop or laptop to show off full-sized, magazine-style layouts and design.

When I first heard about the arrival of the web version, I thought Flipboard might have decided to focus on the web because growth in the app is slowing, but McCue says that’s not the case — in fact, he said, “everything is up, anywhere from 50 to 300 percent, depending on what stat you look at.” According to recent estimates, the company has over 100 million registered users, and it recently confirmed that 50 million of those are monthly average users, up from 30 million last year.

Flipboard snapshots

Flipboard has been through several iterations now, as it has evolved from just a mobile app for reading RSS feeds and websites: the first big launch for the company after its birth came in 2013, when it added the ability for users to curate articles from their streams into their own “magazines.” Over 15 million magazines have now been created by users, McCue said, up from about 10 million last year. The second big offering gave users much more choice in terms of what to follow in the app — using recommendation software developed by Zite, which Flipboard acquired last year.

Better monetization

As with its mobile version, part of what Flipboard feels it offers to publishers is the ability to display their content in a beautiful way, and also to display advertising in the same way, McCue says — which theoretically should lead to better monetization than the typical web banner ad. So the company is working with a select group of publishers to host their content and custom advertising inside the web version and share that revenue, and the first partners in that program are National Geographic and Fast Company.

In the past, Flipboard has been criticized by some publishers and media companies for aggregating their content without paying for it — in much the same way that Google has been criticized for doing with Google News. Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo took aim at Flipboard for this in 2013, and said he was pulling his content from the platform. For many publishers, Flipboard opens links inside a browser rather than displaying the full content, and McCue said that will happen on the web as well. But he hopes publishers will choose to work with the platform:

5 Comments

Greg Silas

I think the web version makes total sense…there’s a lot of graphics per board and while mobile is on the rise, it is no doubt easier on the eyes with a tablet or desktop. Moreover, Mobile phones are not designed to read stuff at length…though good for pictures. So if my Flipboard is full of articles, I’ll ruin my eyes using my phone. Thanks Mathew. @Gregory_Silas

Robson André Costa Lopes

Adoro o caminho contra manada, nadar contra a maré, vocês trilharam isso muito bem, tanto o app, quanto a versão web estão muito legais e funcionais. Parabéns.

dan

I just came to this site, using Flipboard app(site), in the browser.
I hardly come to this site.

jjj

Funny that you think that mobile has to be app and it can’t be in the browser just because it has been fashionable for a bit to make an app out of anything.Growing up means having a website for many.
When it comes to apps on mobile there are a few major services that take the bulk of the usage. FB, Twitter and social in general, IM, Youtube (and other video), and the biggest of all gaming. After all that there isn’t much left. Utilities and productivity are not that big and might or might not be web based and now really a very small % of the users time is left for other apps.
If you compare web browsing with apps usage after excluding gaming and the few core apps you’ll see that web browsing is not that unpopular.
The tiny iphone screen also favored apps vs browser in the US , maybe we’ll see a slight shift now.
In the end not that many apps are worth the screen space and people stop downloading everything and just keep what matters.For everything else there is the browser.
It’s also pretty funny how you don’t think of apps as programs ,they are the same thing , app,apps,appz was and is just another name for programs. On PC we use plenty of apps, we always did, some even had PCs and no internet. The rise is not so much in apps but in web based services.True that in mobile some websites turned into apps and amusing enough on PC some apps jumped in the browser.

Keith Hawn

Excellent points. Also left out of the discussion is the fact that a majority of website visits are still done thru laptops, etc. Not everyone reads TMZ.com via an iPhone…

Comments are closed.