At CES, let’s just concede defeat for an open standard for IoT

10 Comments

Let’s just get this out of the way, y’all. We are not going to see some kind of open standard or HTML-like universal language for the internet of things or the smart home at International CES in Las Vegas next week. Instead we’re going to get a bunch of different platforms that will strive to create walled gardens. Walled gardens that will be bridged — sometimes clumsily — in the clouds via services or hubs. So consumers will have to go all in on HomeKit, or Nest or iControl’s Open Home or Wink or whatever, or work a bit harder with services like If This Then That or SmartThings or others to make their devices work together.

With that in mind, here are the internet of things-related trends we’ll see at CES next week:

  • Apple will have HomeKit, and we’ll have a bit more, but still not all, the information we’ll want from vendors participating in the program.
  • The Works with Nest developer program will have several partners and devices that people should be excited about, although I’m not sure how many of those will be announcements versus actual implementations.
  • I think the iControl’s OpenHome and the Wink certifications will stay in the game and likely come out of this CES with some strong partnerships.
  • We’ll see announcements from one-off device makers that will see them supporting the major platforms through software integrations or even hardware or offer their own programs to help others support those platforms without having to invest development time and effort. This will be a tough area as only a few middlemen will make it.

The consolidation of many of home automation devices under a few platforms will be the major theme of the show, but there will be other internet of things-related trends worth exploring as well. Medical devices for the lay consumer as well as FDA-approved devices for diagnosing fevers and even various illnesses will also be demonstrated. I’ve also seen a variety of connected devices pitched to me related to conditions as varied as chronic pain, anaphylaxis (when you can’t breathe because of an allergic reaction) and diabetes.

As I’ve said, some of these are FDA-approved, while others are purporting to show connections between certain data points the consumer tracks in their blood pressure or heart rate or urine and their health. As more and more of these devices come on the market I’m growing increasingly leery of the claims being made, in part because the mix of statistics that the FDA looks at when evaluating and discussing the efficacy of a medical device and the marketing that the consumer looks at when deciding whether to purchase such as device are very different.

For an example of the disconnect between statistical relevance in the medical field and a consumer’s understanding of what that means, the Boston Globe’s reporting on fetal genetic tests offers a heartbreaking look at what happens when the dry world of math meets marketing. Marketing wins and it’s not always beneficial to the consumer.

The internet of things will also creep further into cars, beacons will provide more presence in our homes, we’ll see more Bluetooth devices and everything will get an algorithm. We’ll even have algorithms to manage our things’ algorithms and possibly a few services to manage our myriad things. Clearly the trends are still telling us that the internet of things and the smart home are still too complicated for most consumers.

But since this is the next big thing, both in terms of selling new gadgets and in terms of gathering ever more data from consumers, the industry is ready to put all of its muscle to figure out how to solve that complexity. Maybe it’s a bigger platform or a better algorithm. Perhaps a service or an app will do the trick. But one thing is for sure: It’s not going to be an open standard.

10 Comments

Bob Frankston

Just because we have a marketing term IoT doesn’t mean there is something coherent to standardize. The Internet was created to connect things without any ability to standardize above the level of past efforts packets. As I wrote in http://rmf.vc/CILIght and my column (as in http://rmf.vc/IEEENotScripted let’s make the simple stuff work before we try to standardize what we can’t even articulate.

mkhera

There are different segments within IoT – Home Automation, Wearables, Enterprise, and Industrial. CES will probably cover just the first two. There is a lot more standardization happening on the Enterprise side (e.g ZigBee in Smart Buildings), and Industrial (RFID, and others in manufacturing processes). With all the hype around IoT, we have to be careful on how we look at each of the segments including issues, benefits, and protocols.

x.o.ware, inc.

IoT as currently defined is just a way for service providers masquerading as device manufacturers to get access to your home network. None of those mfrs want to adopt an open standard, as they all think they can get control of your home networks with their wonderful trojan horse, I mean, camera/thermostat/alarm/whatever.

These manufacturers say they are doing consumers a favor by providing a server that acts as a portal to their home, but the consumers are giving up not just privacy, but security, for when those servers get hacked (and it is if, not when), then all of their customers home networks get exposed.

There are other ways to provide remote access to home networks besides having customer networks configured as extensions of third party servers. When device manufacturers start offering direct access to their products, instead of only through their servers, then an open IoT standard can emerge, as the competition will no longer be for control of home networks, but rather for delivering the best UI.

Storris

IoT is irrelevant until I can ask Google/Cortana/Siri to make sure the Iron and Oven are switched off.

bradnic

I don’t see wearables and smart home being the same markets btw. sure there are cool use cases for them working together, but I don’t see them defining markets.

bradnic

Still too early.. market hasn’t ruled. I see this becoming Apple, Sonos, Nest and “everyone else” (Amazon has squandered their opportunity). Stay tuned for CES 2016, after 2015 holiday season.

Mark

So, no IoT. Just home control extended to the cloud? Of course IoT is much more than things you’d see at CES.

Comments are closed.