Help yourself

Police can search cell phones without warrant, Canada rules

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

Police in Canada don’t need a judge’s permission to search a suspect’s cell phone so long as they follow certain steps, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Thursday in a split decision that comes as a setback for privacy advocates.

The case concerned a jewelry heist in which police arrested two suspects and, upon searching one of their cell phones, discovered an incriminating text message and a photo of a handgun, which in turn became evidence to convict them.

The suspects argued that since the search took place without a warrant, it violated their constitutional rights against unreasonable search and seizure because cell phones contain such a deep trove of personal information.

But while the majority of the court acknowledged that cell phones are now akin to personal computers, the judges nonetheless concluded that the balance between privacy and security favored the police in this case. They ruled that a warrant was not necessary so long the judges limited the scope of their search, and so long as they took notes of what they were doing.

Three dissenting judges, however, blasted that reasoning and noted that cell phones are “quantitatively and qualitatively” different from other physical items, such as bags, that police have historically had a common law right to search at the time of arrest. The judges likened the cell phone to a house key, and pointed out that police can’t search a suspect’s house simply because they have the key in their pocket.

Overall, the case shows how courts everywhere are trying to recalibrate privacy rights at a time when most people are caring around phones that provide enormous amounts of information about their personal life.

The Canadian ruling is also significant because it splits from the ruling in a similar case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court this summer. In the case, the judges issued an unambiguous 9-0 ruling that police do have to get a warrant notwithstanding the inconvenience.

One bright spot for privacy advocates in the decision, as Canadian law professor Michael Geist noted, is that the court found that the presence of a password is immaterial when it came to determining whether or not privacy rights are at stake.

Overall, however, the case is a step back for privacy since it rejects a bright line rule such as the American one, and instead lets police search phones largely as they wish. While the Canadian court did impose new common law obligations for such searches, these steps are in reality only likely to create further legal confusion.

3 Responses to “Police can search cell phones without warrant, Canada rules”

  1. Jacqueline

    Although that is probably of assistance in MAJOR crimes, in some instances it wipes the essence of :”presumed innocent” so it gets searched before a ruling is made ( innocent or guilty). I think it has now become PANDORA’s box…. and will put more obligation on the police to administer the searching of cell phone and thus take them away from their true job and duty of policing crime. Which in turn will mean they are so busy keeping notes on each arrest and cell phone that we now have to hire more just to keep pace. There go the taxes up again… If there had been parameters put around the ruling: ie: searches stipulating in “regards to murder or drug busts only” I could see that. but a blanket search is just a Pandora’s box. Example …what if the officer searching the cell phone discovers that the arrested person is having sex with the chiefs wife… does he/she now have an obligation to reveal that……. nasty Pandora’s box… good luck..

    The essence of the law is presumed innocent…then prove the crime. SO now what????
    Supreme court should have stipulated in regards to MAJOR crimes: murder and drug busts only.