Google is distorting right to be forgotten debate, EU Justice head claims

8 Comments

Critics of the European Union’s controversial “right to be forgotten” policy, which lets citizens ask companies to delete their personal data, are “playing false” and trying to derail important reforms, according to EU Justice Commissioner, Martine Reicharts.

Speaking in Lyon, France on Monday, Reicharts singled out [company]Google[/company] for allegedly trying to undermine a controversial court ruling in May that has already led to more than 91,000 asking for it to delete search results they dislike.

“Search engines such as Google and other affected companies complain loudly. But they should remember this: handling citizens’ personal data brings huge economic benefits to them. […] Those who try to use distorted notions of the right to be forgotten to discredit the reform proposals are playing false. We must not fall for this,” said Reicharts in her speech.

Reichart’s words appear aimed at Google and others, including news outlets and U.K. politicians, who have expressed concern that the right to be forgotten allows people to rewrite history, and is provide a tool for bad people — like pedophiles and disgraced politicians — to try and cover up their misdeeds.

The controversy over the ruling, issued by the European Court of Justice, has arisen in part because the court provided little guidance about how it is to be applied, including part of the ruling that says the right-to-be-forgotten doesn’t always apply if the public interest is at stake. In July, Google’s head lawyer wrote an article in the Guardian about the difficulties of balancing privacy rights and the public interest.

Reichart, however, said such concerns are overblown. She noted that the right to have personal information actually dates from 1995, and that the court ruling simply confirms that it applies to non-European web firms operating in Europe. She also portrayed the court ruling as part of a larger data reform effort that could improve the economic fortunes of Europe by increasing trust among consumers.

“Internet users will have to regain their confidence. Only if people are willing to give out their personal data will companies reap the full rewards of our digital single market.”

Reichart also repeated earlier vows by EU officials to impose tougher penalties on companies that breach personal data laws, citing proposed reforms that could impose sanctions that reach up to 2 percent of a company’s global revenue.

“If a company has broken the rules, this should have serious consequences. Yet so far, the fines European data protection authorities can impose are very low. For giants like Google, they are just pocket money.”

Despite the tough message, however, Reichart is unlikely to take any immediate action since she occupies a caretaker role as Commissioner. A new EU Commission will only be unveiled later this year.

8 Comments

Renato Gelforte

Let’s face it! This is the core statement: “But they should remember this: handling citizens’ personal data brings huge economic benefits to them. […] ”
HUGE ECONOMIC BENEFITS!

I support indiscriminately any effort done by Europeans to contrast the money machine established by Google that do not give any economical benefits to ours countries (“OURS” means EU, although some of us still think of himself!)
It’s very simple: we must lie! The issue is not privacy or other stories! The issue is the money! That’s all.
Today we threaten Google using the “right to be forgotten”, tomorrow we may invent something else.
In less then 10 years an entire business compartment dedicated to the news business has disappeared! Jobs lost and money lost!
Only few companies are winning the game of the digital disruption, they have to pay the bill.

Tchael

Distorted? It shouldn’t be Google’s responsibility to remove pages it indexes. It should be the responsibility of whatever news site posted the material to remove it.

Know what would be a real kick to the teeth for this law? If people organized to bring awareness to each link that is getting removed/hidden. Since apparently leaving the material on the web for people to find is okay, so long as it isn’t “easily findable” in a search engine.

Even as someone totally for privacy, this law is a retarded way of going around it.

Adam Miarka

“Google, create a process to remove people from search”
“Done”
“Hey, that’s not what we wanted!”

jonsmirl

This is just so messed up. Google should have nothing to do with this. If someone wants a page out of the index, go to source web site and mark the page “do not index”.

Right now the EU has turned Google into an unwilling part of their government and given it the power to make decisions. And of course politicians don’t like the decisions Google makes. The mistake was in forcing Google to make them in the first place.

Tad Chef

You don’t understand the law. This is about third party sites badmouthing you so you can’t de-index them.

Comments are closed.