I live in Chicago, where you can buy a hotdog (mustard, tomatoes and pepper — no ketchup) on every street corner and that molten cheese-and-sausage coronary known as the Chicago-style pie is always a phonecall away. The Windy City has a reputation for unhealthy eaters, but a new study by recipe search engine Yummly indicates Chicago isn’t the unhealthiest city in the country when it comes to cooking our own food.
That distinction goes to St. Louis.
Yummly, one of the largest recipe search sites on the web, analyzed over a billion individual data points from 100 million user searches over the last year to create a geographic breakdown of they types of recipes we Americans suss out online. Then it used its own recipe analytics to break down those dishes into raw ingredient data, determining the general healthiness of the food we cook (or at least the healthiness of the recipes we search for).
The resulting trends may not surprise you. On the more “cosmopolitan” coasts, people tended toward healthier dishes, favoring fowl and fish over four-legged beasts. San Francisco, which scored highest on Yummly’s health index, is 30 percent more likely to search for a vegetable dish than Cleveland, Ohio, which scored third lowest.
We in the middle of this great land, well, we love our bacon, cheese and cake. And frankly I’m a bit disappointed that we Chicagoans — given our obsession with meat and fat stuffed into intestines — didn’t even rank in the top five of Yummly’s unhealthy index of the 25 most populous metro areas. In case you were wondering, though, here are the cities that did:
Fellow inlanders (and North Carolinians), it should make you feel better to know that according to Yummly’s data, California reinforced all of the expected stereotypes for kale and tofu consumption. So, we may die sooner, but hey, at least it will be with a belly full of meat.