Skip to content

Main Navigation

Gigaom Search
  • Menu

  • About Us
  • ResearchExpand
    • Cloud & Infrastructure
    • Data Infrastructure, AI & Analytics
    • Edge & Networking
    • Security & Risk
    • DevOps & Applications
  • Analysts
  • Search
  • Sign in
Become a Client

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends. Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community

Join the Community!

Courts split over NSA phone records: New ruling says spy program is legal

Jeff Roberts Dec 27, 2013 (Jun 10, 2020) -- Blog Post

A federal judge in New York has rejected an ACLU challenge to a controversial NSA program to collect phone records, ruling on Friday that the program does not violate the Constitution. The decision comes two weeks after the judge’s counterpart in Washington, DC, came to the opposite conclusion and described the program as “Orwellian” and a probable violation of the First and Fourth Amendments.

The split in rulings increases the likelihood that the NSA surveillance program could land before the Supreme Court next year, and provides more fodder to a debate over what the government can do with so-called “telephony metadata” — a massive database of every phone call in the company that the NSA has compiled from carriers like Verizon(s vz).

The “metadata” in question represents million of phone numbers (rather than names) but the government is able to drill down to specific identities when it makes a “query” of the database; the NSA says it only makes a relative handful of such queries every year. (New research, however, suggests raw metadata discloses more than the government suggests.)

In the new ruling (embedded below), US District Judge William Pauley III repeatedly invokes 9/11, Edward Snowden and the specter of terrorist threats in rejecting the ACLU’s claims that the metadata collection is too broad. Pauley stressed that the NSA requires all the phone records to connect dots:

Because, without all the data points, the Government cannot be certain it connected the pertinent ones … the collection of virtually all telephony metadata is necessary to permit the NSA, not the FBI, to do the algorithmic data analysis that allow the NSA to determine “connections between known and unknown international terrorist operatives.

He added:

Armed with all the metadata, NSA can draw connections it might otherwise never be able to find.

The decision also likens the NSA’s sweep of phone records to government monitoring of Western Union transactions. It stresses that the metadata (a massive list of phone numbers and call records) belongs to the phone companies, not phone users, and likens it to police investigations based on Facebook(s fb) and other instances of the “third party doctrine” — a legal situation where people can’t claim privacy rights because they have passed on personal information to another person or company.

The ACLU promptly blasted the ruling and said it would appeal:

“We are extremely disappointed with this decision, which misinterprets the relevant statutes, understates the privacy implications of the government’s surveillance and misapplies a narrow and outdated precedent to read away core constitutional protections,” said Jameel Jaffer, ACLU deputy legal director, in a statement.

The ACLU’s appeal, along with related cases, could eventually lay the table for the Supreme Court to weigh in.

The different legal outlooks are apparent in Pauley’s decision, which warned of “judicial-Monday-morning-quarterbacking” national security issues. The line did not appear to be a direct swipe against his counterpart, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, though Pauley did make several references to Leon’s decision, which caused a stir by imposing a future injunction on the government phone program.

The Leon decision also stated that Supreme Court decisions on privacy are out of date, due in large part to the rise of cell phones. Pauley disagreed and, in a line that will likely rankle privacy advocates, writes:

“[People’s] relationship with their telecommunications providers has not changed and is just as frustrating”

Pauley’s ruling provides a rare voice of support for NSA metadata program at a time when it has been been assailed not only by Judge Leon, but by the White House’s own advisory panel. The panel, which was expected to be a mouthpiece for the President, surprised legal and security observers by proposing that the phone database should be dismantled.

Pauley appears to disagree, writing in the decision “what metadata is has not changed over time” (emphasis in original).

While Pauley’s ruling is a disappointment for civil liberties advocates, it does give reformers one cause for optimism. Specifically, Pauley questions the role of America’s secret spy court known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

After noting that he is answerable only to the Second Circuit Appeals Court and the Supreme Court, he writes:

“[The FISC court’s] ex parte procedures are necessary to retain secrecy but are not ideal for interpreting statutes. This case shows how FISC decisions may affect every American — and perhaps their interest should have a voice in FISC.”

ACLU v Clapper, Pauley Decision

[protected-iframe id=”38cea1b4ed2e12db60d8af009aac6c00-14960843-34118173″ info=”//www.scribd.com/embeds/194104347/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&show_recommendations=true” width=”100%” height=”600″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Technology
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Post

Related Research

Headshot Card Template
Johnny Baltisberger Mar 18, 2021 (Mar 30, 2021) -- Podcast Episode

Voices in Innovation – Digital Transformation in the Age of Covid with Saahil Panikar

VP of Research Jon Collins speaks with the brilliant Saahil Panikar about digital transformation in the COVID climate, and how to apply…

Read More
Digital Transformation
Corridor Of  Server Room With Server Racks In Datacenter. 3D Ill
Image credit: monsitj
Sponsored by
William McKnight, Jake Dolezal Mar 2, 2021 -- Report

SQL Transaction Processing, Price-Performance Testing

The fundamental underpinning of an organization is its transactions. It must do them well, with integrity and performance. Not only has transaction…

Read More
Cloud Native Databases, Hybrid Cloud Data Protection, IaaS
Isometric Web hosting, data backup copy, recover file concept, cloud data storage, digital technology, blockchain, server room. Internet traffic routing, server room rack vector technology
Image credit: OstapenkoOlena
Sponsored by
Thom Langford Dec 23, 2020 (Dec 24, 2020) -- TCO & Benchmark

End-to-End Digital Document Transformation Field Test Report

The business world is in a constant state of change. It’s moving faster than ever with more elaborate legal and compliance requirements…

Read More
Digital Transformation
VC_radar
Andrew J. Brust, Yiannis Antoniou Nov 5, 2020 (Nov 5, 2020) -- Market Radar

GigaOm Radar for Video Conferencing Platforms

The world has changed. Almost overnight, the COVID-19 pandemic forced millions of workers worldwide out of their offices and into their dining…

Read More
Video Conferencing, Work & Collaboration
cyberspace-5409039_1920
Image credit: Xpics
Sponsored by
Jon Collins Oct 2, 2020 (Dec 10, 2020) -- Report

Digital Risk, Compliance, and Data Centricity

This report examines the current state of digital governance, risk, and compliance within enterprise companies—an area that has recently seen dramatic shifts…

Read More
Compliance, Security & Risk
Headshot Card Template
Johnny Baltisberger Oct 1, 2020 (Oct 1, 2020) -- Podcast Episode

Voices in Innovation – Stowe Boyd Discusses the Key Criteria for Evaluating Collaborative Whiteboards

GigaOm analyst Stowe Boyd joins us to discuss his new report on the Key Criteria for Evaluating Collaborative Whiteboards. GigaOm analyst Stowe…

Read More
Work Chat, Work Media

Stay on top of emerging trends impacting your industry with updates from our GigaOm Research Community.

Join Research Community
Gigaom
  • About Us
  • Analysts
  • Press Room
  • Contact
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • © GigaOm All Rights Reserved 2021
This website uses cookies; by continuing you are a agreeing to our Privacy Policy Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

This is an necessary category.

Save & Accept