Blog Post

Which US states are hot for solar power (map)?

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

Solar power technology is proliferating across the U.S. as costs drop and awareness grows. (Check out these charts to see solar’s amazing growth last year.) But the political atmosphere for solar power varies greatly state to state.

To help navigate the landscape, clean energy advocacy group Solar Power Rocks released its 2013 rankings for states’ commitment to solar power. The group ranked states based on a methodology that factors in five years’ of data regarding solar incentives, policy, infrastructure and metering, and assigned states a letter grade based on how easy or difficult it is to go solar.

We mapped out their rankings and it seems, not surprisingly, that the possibility for solar power is most promising in pockets of the Southwest and Northeast, while the South trails far behind. For more about the state of the solar market, see our solar coverage.


15 Responses to “Which US states are hot for solar power (map)?”

  1. Joseph

    I am leasing my solar panels from Sungevity. It was $0 downpayment, $28/month, they took care of all the paperwork and provide full maintenance. My panels are now producing much more electricity than we are consuming. They provide a “performance guarantee”, so if panels produce less than promised, they write a check for the difference. They provide a free quote without a site visit, they see your roof through Google Earth. If you move, they will move the panels for free or you can transfer the lease to the new owners. They panels are fully insured, free of charge. They also provide warranty for the roof against any leaks. They do everything, I just pay my lease. You can go to You can use referral code 94755 so that you get $500 gift card.

  2. Rob56

    Storage of power is the key as everyone knows by now. Nothing solar will be feasible until the power storage problem is solved. That means a battery patents yet to be released by big oil is the key. That is when solar will take off. Now we also know that the oil companies that refuse to let go of the strings of power buy up the newest in battery technology. Until we can rein in the oil companies solar will always be second or third to oil and coal. It a shame but that is the story of solar when we have a 1000 years worth of oil reserves all capped nice an secure solar won’t be seen as a competitor in the near future.

    • Thomas J. Romano

      Here in New YOrk it is being used for things like parking canopies. The long island rail road, county, and state governments are using them in their parking lots as cannopies over the parking lots.

      BRookhaven labs just installed a massive solar farm to use for their solar panel research. My Town just recently stated they will be installing solar panels on the roof of town hall (besides the wind turbine they already have).

  3. You didn’t mention a key word used several times by in its article, namely, “subsidies.” You do use the word “incentives” which, in this case, is a euphemism for “subsidies.” A more honest headline would be, “2013 Ranking of Solar Power Subsidies offered by States.” Without these enormous subsidies solar power is about as bright as a burned out light bulb. The only way this works is if you aren’t spending your own money. If you’re spending others’ money, the solar power scheme looks great!

    • Alexandr Shevtsov

      Ha-ha! Do you think that coal, gas and nuclear power plants even more do not receive huge subsidies from the government?

      • scarlet

        Maybe you’re right. But at least we know that if there were no subsidies, the coal, gas, and nuclear COULD turn a profit. We know that solar has been unable to turn a profit and companies like Google and Apple use solar because of the money they get from the government (citizens). If they didn’t get money for making solar, I’m sure they wouldn’t jump on it.

        The free market wouldn’t go solar because it isn’t feasible. We know this by watching failing solar companies in the United States that can only exist with a bailout.

        Glad I could educate you.

        • Alexandr Shevtsov

          Do you know about companies that make electricity from fuel and do not receive subsidies?
          And do you know why the market has not gone massively in solar energy? And I think it’s not because its price is high, but because its price is too low and will not take too much power consumer margins. Profit seller of electricity and the price of electricity to consumers are two different things.
          For comparison, I’ve read on the Internet that the French nuclear power company produced electricity at seven billion dollars, and the subsidies received by 40 (!) Billion dollars, аlso, U.S. coal companies receive very large subsidies.
          Money from the fuel business is very dirty.

        • therealgreenplease

          Oh really now, it’s not feasible? Why? What’s your take on CST?

          The “free marketers” that argue against solar are full of crap. If you want to remove the subsidies, fine, remove them and take them away from coal, oil, gas, nuclear, and wind while you’re at it. However, you also MUST separate generation from distribution. Without doing so a lot of capital will never be able to participate.

        • dyota

          Do you realize we spend billions in military expenses guarding oil lanes, in the Middle East so you can fill up your car every week? Iraq’s oil grab is going to cost us almost $6 Trillion, that’s probably double today’s price without “Subsidies”. Ever tried to insure a nuclear plant?, yeah just call your agent, the fed picks that up. See those high temperatures and forest fires and farm subsidies for drought? you guessed it too, “other people money” picks that up