Blog Post

Kim Dotcom raging over destroyed MegaUpload files

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

The image of Kim Dotcom that we’ve gotten accustomed to in recent months is that of a flamboyant and defiant hacker, holed up in his mansion in New Zealand, with his luxury car collection and household staff of 50-plus.

Yesterday, there was a different Kim Dotcom. He was crying.

Dotcom announced that one of his European hosting partners, LeaseWeb, had deleted petabytes of data from MegaUpload stored across 630 servers. Over the ensuing 24 hours, Dotcom, who is fighting U.S. efforts to extradite him on charges of money laundering and copyright infringement, and his lawyer Ira Rothken sent a deluge of tweets accusing LeaseWeb and the Department of Justice of destroying evidence. Dotcom said he was “in tears” when he discovered that the files had been deleted.

KimDotcomLeasewebLeaseWeb released a blog post that said that the data — comprising only about a tenth of a percent of the Dutch company’s overall storage capacity– was held for a year without any compensation or attempts to access it. The company also said that it wrote Dotcom to inform him of the repurposing, and received no response.

“As no response was received, we commenced the re-provisioning of the servers in February 2013,” the post says. “To minimize security risks and maximize the privacy of our clients, it is a standard procedure at LeaseWeb to completely clean servers before they are offered to any new customer.”

Dotcom has called the company untruthful, saying that his law team and the Electronic Frontier Foundation sent many letters to LeaseWeb, and has urged Rothken to release letters showing that he requested that LeaseWeb keep the data as the DOJ froze the assets needed to pay for the server space.

“Let me be crystal clear. #Leaseweb has NEVER informed our legal team or anybody at #Megaupload about the deletion of servers until TODAY,” Dotcom wrote.

Rothken, on his own Twitter account, implied the destruction of files was to rig the trial, tweeting, “[I]n our view the US is responsible for destruction of Megaupload data – US trying to concoct a win rather than doing justice.”

The major pain point — and the reason why both Rothken and Dotcom are accusing LeaseWeb of having a separate agenda– is that those servers (which largely managed European users) held Dotcom’s personal MegaUpload information. Dotcom said on Twitter, “The FBI seized all my data and hasn’t given me a copy yet. And now my backups on #Megaupload are gone too. How convenient.”

“Think about it,” he continued. “The data in the world’s largest copyright case is getting deleted with DOJ blessing. How does that make sense? It’s EVIDENCE.”

Of course, the LeaseWeb shutdown didn’t eliminate all of MegaUpload’s data. The U.S. has confiscated roughly 60 servers worth of information via the infamous “MegaUpload Raid” — which Dotcom eleased video footage from on Youtube (NSFW for language). In addition, server partners Carpathia and Cogent are cooperating with Dotcom and storing the servers in a warehouse until the trial next year.

5 Responses to “Kim Dotcom raging over destroyed MegaUpload files”

  1. Kim Dotcom or whatever he likes to call himself is lying to you.

    If you don’t pay for a service, you get no service, it is just that simple. Leaseweb kept the servers for a Year.

    If you can pay for a big party for your new Mega, why can’t you pay the bills to keep the data from your old customers?

    Carphatia was ordered by the US department of Justice to keep them online and Carpathia does not get paid for it, Carphatia looses 9000 dollars a day to keep them online. Thanks for that.

  2. Virtuous

    The Feds should have paid for and mandated a reasonable process for people to claim their own files before these files were destroyed. The files should have been treated like personal property.

    • U REALLY GOTTA BE KIDDING………then what would be the whole point of shutting the whole site together…..lmao.
      The point being over a larger extent the files stored on those servers were either pirated or some illegal contents .

      • RayZfox

        They did not legally shut the website down. They did it ex-judicially. “…nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” 5th amendment.