Why Apple doesn’t need a cheap iPhone if T-Mobile does it for them


Does Apple need a cheaper iPhone to attract entry-level smartphone buyers? T-Mobile may have just found a way to do it for them here in the U.S.

The idea that Apple(s AAPL) needs to produce a phone that attracts buyers that can’t or won’t lay down $200 up front for a smartphone in addition to a monthly carrier contract has been touted as a way for Apple to regain its momentum in smartphones. The thinking is that Apple has nearly saturated the upper end of the market in established markets, causing its yearly iPhone sales growth to slow somewhat. The real growth, some say, will come when Apple convinces people who’d otherwise opt for the cheapest phone that comes with their plan to buy an iPhone instead.

T-Mobile’s headline-grabbing $99 unlocked iPhone 5 may be one way of getting there. When you do the math — the $99 upfront payment T-Mobile requires plus 24 months of monthly payments at $20 — the total adds up to $580. That’s less than the $650 Apple charges for an iPhone that’s not locked to a specific carrier. And in addition to those savings, T-Mobile is also offering cheaper monthly plans, as my colleague Kevin Fitchard has detailed.

For some people these prices will put the iPhone in their grasp. But it’s still not exactly cheap: what T-Mobile is offering is still probably a couple hundred dollars more than what analysts have suggested would count as a true “low-cost” iPhone.

It is actually possible to pay even less for an iPhone from a major U.S. carrier: the nearly 3-year-old iPhone 4 is free on contract in the U.S. and the iPhone 4S is $99 on contract. But T-Mobile is actually making the latest-model iPhone cheaper.

T-Mobile’s plan may stand out from the likes of Verizon, Sprint and AT&T, but if you look outside of the U.S., what it’s doing is not all that novel: it’s just a payment plan. It shifts the cost of the device over two years in place of a higher upfront cost or a subsidized, locked device. If you look at what Apple does in some developing markets like China and India, it looks very similar. Apple has used no-interest or low-interest payment plans as a way of helping give customers, who might not otherwise be able to swing an expensive smartphone, a way in.

At surface level, this plan is about T-Mobile finding a way to attract new customers. But there’s also potentially interesting benefits for Apple too. It doesn’t just get yet another iPhone carrier partner, it might also be getting a new look from U.S. customers from that coveted “lower end of the market” that formerly wouldn’t have considered an iPhone because of the pricier subsidized, locked carrier models.

Apple executives have been careful to say that “cheap” smartphones will never be “the future of Apple’s business.” But maybe, if T-Mobile’s experiment works, more creative pricing plans will be.



Well read this and then tell me about how T-Mobile and Solavei have joined up…

“Solavei is revolutionizing the mobile space, offering $49/month no-contract plans for unlimited text, voice and 4G data, and providing discounts with hundreds of top retailers across the country. Plus by rewarding you when you share Solavei with others, an unprecedented opportunity exists to get your piece of this multi-billion dollar industry.”


Get informed, visit: http://alexandra.sharesolavei.com


If these companies don’t lower these wireless bills. Many won’t want a cell phone soon enough. The taxes are enough to make you flip.


what is this stupid author talking about , cheap Iphone is for the developing world and T mobile is not present in outside USA.

He just wasted people time

T.J. Kniveton

Let me summarize this article in 4 sentences:

T-mobile may have met the need for a cheap iPhone. It’s cheaper than what Apple currently sells an unlocked iPhone for. But it’s still $580, which ain’t cheap. So they may NOT have actually met the need for a cheap iPhone.


Apple doesn’t get it. It isn’t the phone that is expensive for people. IT IS THE $100 A MONTH PLANS.

Thomas Mackelburg

I don’t get the whole “cheaper iPhone” rumors, can somebody please explain it to me. The iPhone 4 and 4s are the cheaper iPhones. It sounds like these bloggers want Apple to do what Samsung is doing in releasing their flagship Galaxy S4 and quietly offering an S4 mini with such shit specs that it makes no sense to buy it over the S3 (which people do). So what purpose does having an iPhone 5s, iPhone 5s mini???? and the iPhone 5 (as well as the older, cheaper 4 and 4s) serve if the mini is inferior to the previous generation iPhone 5? Whoa, just noticed Erica Ogg is cute! Hit me up girl.


cheaper iphone = newer technology with cheaper parts (no retina, plastic back), but better than the 4s and 4


Tmobile couldn’t find bars if it were spring break in Miami…iPhone isn’t sold through them because it runs like junk through them


That’s funny because I bought a Noosy SIM cutter to cut down a pay as you go T-Mobile SIM to run my iPad mini because even though T-Mobile has no LTE in my area I have faster speeds more consistently on T-Mobile than AT&T.

Ormy Underhill

The folks that can’t afford the iPhone now, dont have the credit to finance the TMoble device.


Cheaper iphone is not about the us market( still number one selling , NOT SHIPPING , smartphone) its more for emerging markets, India, China, southamerica, latinamerica


Precisely right, which makes one wonder what the purpose of this article is.

Comments are closed.