Blog Post

Can the French civilize Twitter? Should they try?

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

It’s no secret that relationships in France are très compliqué, especially for the country’s ruling elite. President François Hollande was stuck in a tricky tryst between his long-term partner and his lover. His predecessor, Nicolas Sarkozy, pursued a high-profile relationship with model and singer Carla Bruni after his second wife left him. And even François Mitterand had a love child, only revealed after as he came to the end of his political career.

But it’s not just their love lives that French officials find tough to negotiate: the internet, too, gives them plenty of heartache.

One example? A series of offensive Twitter memes that swept through France over the past couple of weeks has provoked a strong reaction at the highest levels.

First came #UnBonJuif (“A good Jew”), which became the spark for a volley of anti-Semitic jokes. Then there was #SiMonFilsEstGay (“If my son was gay”). You can guess the rest. Clue: it wasn’t nice. France has a particular sensitivity to hate speech, and the torrent of Twitter abuse prompted Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, the Minister for Women’s Rights, into action. In the pages of Le Monde, she denounced those spewing racist and homophobic messages and said she plans to start a consultation involving Twitter in the New Year to see what can be done to stop the tide.

Homophobic remarks, she said, were “in absolute contradiction with the values of the Republic”.

Of course she’s right — homophobia is vile. But it will be interesting to see where this goes. Is it grandstanding from a politician, or will there be a genuine policy that gets produced? The way the government chooses to act could be indicative of its approach to the internet… and it could go either way.

After all, seen in one context, this is yet another attempt by French officials to “civilize” the internet. That’s been a regular refrain from French leaders, first with Sarkozy and now under the man who replaced him. The internet — an American invention — is a debasing force on France, a threat to l’exception culturelle, and a powerful disruptor that must be kept in check.

But it’s not just France that feels this pressure. In another sense, this is just one small part of the much wider struggle between Europe’s establishment and the social media. Governments across the continent have been sent into a tailspin over internet freedoms. Germany has struggled with Neo-Nazis on Twitter, and Britain probably has the best — or worst — form on this. It’s thrown people in prison, dragged silly court cases on forever, and held parliamentary investigations into how social media up-ends the order of things.

Gun ownership mapAnd the battle between Twitter and free speech is isn’t just an issue in Europe, or in censorious regimes. The same questions are appearing, if in slightly altered forms, in America. Take the unmasking of Reddit troll Violentacrez, or the decision to publish the addresses of registered gun owners. Even in America, people are beginning to understand that “free speech” doesn’t mean “speech without consequences”. Exercising your right to say what you like to extremes doesn’t mean you won’t get held accountable.

Perhaps it’s all to be expected.

It’s nearly a year since Twitter announced that it would censor tweets in some jurisdictions — an agreement that it largely got blasted for, even if it was sensible. Now officials are trying to flex their muscles.

However, when new legislation gets mooted (as it inevitably does) we need to remember that almost every country already has ways of dealing with hate speech in real life, they just need to understand sensible ways of applying those laws in the online environment. For example, when Twitter users falsely accused a British politician of being a child abuser, I pointed out that legal recourse to tackle was already there. Lord McAlpine has wasted no time acting on that.

At the same time, ordinary people — who have suddenly been granted a super power — need to understand where social media slots into the spectrum between private conversation and public broadcast. After incorrect — and potentially dangerous — information rebounded around the network after the Sandy Hook shootings, I argued that if Twitter allows anyone to become their own media outlet, then we should all assume individual responsibility for what we tweet.

Nothing changes, but we need to navigate this course very carefully. Let’s see if France decides to take the high road or the low.

9 Responses to “Can the French civilize Twitter? Should they try?”

  1. As the spouse of a French citizen, we’ve had lively debates about what Freedom of Speech means in each of our native countries. Europeans have a different approach than Americans and the two sides don’t see it the same way. The Internet and a much freer flow of information is going to continue to be a challenge ‘over there’ and I’m fascinated to see how the debate unfolds.

  2. I have been to just about every type of Blog and posting of Yahoo, Google and MSN and one thing that is noteworthy is it is expected no matter what you post there will be at least one? if not many insults for whatever or whoever post on whatever the subject is? It is our current culture,. I have personally posted about 25,000 post on just Yahoo and have only had one time on February 17th, 2005 in which there was not someone who had not insulted or acted uncivilized?, I think this might have just been an anomaly?
    Has anyone here, ever had an entire day of viewing the News or Blogs and not seen an Internet user not act uncivilized?

  3. First mankind must have at least one civilized being?, and so far in his development and evolution, it has not occurred. I base this on the average of world current events. When the average of atrocities of mankind become a minimum or to my liking of nonexistent, then we of the human species have earned the right to call ourselves “CIVILIZED!”.

    definition of; Civilized .
    culturally advanced: having advanced cultural and social development
    refined: refined in tastes
    1. Having a highly developed society and culture.
    2. Showing evidence of moral and intellectual advancement; humane, ethical, and reasonable: terrorist acts that shocked the civilized world.
    3. Marked by refinement in taste and manners; cultured; polished.
    Adj. 1. civilized – having a high state of culture and development both social and technological; “terrorist acts that shocked the civilized world”
    educated – possessing an education (especially having more than average knowledge)
    refined – (used of persons and their behavior) cultivated and genteel; “she was delicate and refined and unused to hardship”; “refined people with refined taste”
    noncivilised, noncivilized – not having a high state of culture and social development
    2. civilized – marked by refinement in taste and manners; “cultivated speech”; “cultured Bostonians”; “cultured tastes”; “a genteel old lady”; “polite society”
    cultured, genteel, polite, civilised, cultivated
    refined – (used of persons and their behavior) cultivated and genteel; “she was delicate and refined and unused to hardship”; “refined people with refined taste”

  4. benjaminlupu

    From a French… This article raises interesting points. However, as usual should I say, its author uses so familiar bunch of stupid clichés about French people. We’re tired hearing the same things about us again and again…