Blog Post

If Facebook isn’t thinking about buying Tumblr, it should be

Stay on Top of Emerging Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

It might seem a little early to start talking about potential Facebook acquisitions considering the social network just completed its $736-million purchase of Instagram, and its share price is still 40 percent lower than it was when the company went public. But I think Facebook should start thinking hard (assuming it isn’t already) about trying to acquire Tumblr. Why? For some or all of the same reasons that it felt compelled to buy Instagram — including the fact that the massive growth and engagement Tumblr is seeing is a direct threat to Facebook’s future success. It seems obvious someone is going to take advantage of that, and if it isn’t Facebook then it will be a competitor.

This idea struck me again as I was preparing for my talk with Tumblr founder David Karp at GigaOM’s RoadMap conference on Monday, which you can read about (and see a video clip of) here. I pulled together a lot of statistics about the size of the service, but it quickly became obvious that there wasn’t much point, since they would almost certainly be out of date by the time I hit the stage. Sure enough, Karp mentioned that Tumblr recently crossed the 20 billion pageview-per-month mark, up from the 16 billion that is mentioned on its website.

When you look at Tumblr’s size and growth, it’s easy to assume that you have somehow made a mistake and added too many zeroes: at the beginning of this year the network was at 15 billion pageviews, and a little more than a year ago it was at 10 billion. According to estimates from Quantcast, in the past year the site has almost doubled the number of monthly visitors it gets, from about 80 million to almost 140 million. There are more than 35 billion posts on the almost 80 million blogs that are hosted on the service, and it gets tens of millions of new posts every day from what Karp told me were its 160 million or so members.

When comScore looked at the amount of time that users spend on different sites earlier this year, Facebook was still far and away the leader, with about 400 minutes per month, but Tumblr and Pinterest were tied for second place, with about 90 minutes per month. Time spent may not be a great measure of actual engagement — since many users leave sites like Facebook or Tumblr open in a window for hours at a time — but those are still pretty compelling numbers. And there have been some indications that Facebook’s engagement levels are falling, or at least levelling off.

It’s not just the growth, it’s the level of engagement

Those are some of the number-based reasons for why Facebook should be interested in Tumblr. The other part of the argument is more anecdotal: It comes from watching how both of my teenaged daughters use the service, and the powerful hold it has over the way that they consume and share all kinds of content, especially visual content (including animated GIFs, etc.) — and the corresponding decline in the amount of time they spend on Facebook. For them, Facebook seems to have become something they feel they have to use rather than something they want to spend a lot of time on, much like email is for older users. When it comes to sharing info about their favorite TV shows or movies or likes and dislikes, they use Tumblr almost exclusively.

If I were Mark Zuckerberg, I would be more than a little worried about that phenomenon, just as the Facebook co-founder and CEO was apparently worried about the growth of Instagram, and the threat that it posed to Facebook’s dominance of the photo-sharing market and the mobile market — and the possibility that a competitor such as Twitter or Google or Apple might acquire it. As Om described it after Facebook announced the $1-billion purchase (which lost some of its value after Facebook went public and its share price fell):

“Facebook was scared shitless and knew that for first time in its life it arguably had a competitor that could not only eat its lunch, but also destroy its future prospects. Why? Because Facebook is essentially about photos, and Instagram had found and attacked Facebook’s achilles heel — mobile photo sharing.”

It’s true that Tumblr is not nearly as large a player in mobile as Instagram was, but it is clearly a huge and growing force when it comes to sharing and engaging with visual content of all kinds — in other words, it’s the kind of curatorial and creative market that lots of advertisers and brands are interested in appealing to. The sharing of that content is exactly what Facebook has tried to encourage with its “frictionless sharing” apps and features, but much of that has been awkwardly handled from a user point of view and it’s not clear what effect it has had on engagement.

The bottom line is that any service that is growing as rapidly as Tumblr, and sucking up a massive amount of the attention of younger users, is a potential threat to Facebook’s future growth. Theoretically, it could acquire Tumblr for something close to what it was willing to spend for Instagram — since Tumblr’s last financing round allegedly valued it at about $800 million — and then keep the network as a standalone entity, as it has with the photo-sharing service (which has continued to grow by orders of magnitude).

The only stumbling block is that David Karp and his backers may see the value of remaining independent and the potential for building something even larger than they have now.

Post and thumbnail images courtesy of Flickr user Gabriele Coletti

81 Responses to “If Facebook isn’t thinking about buying Tumblr, it should be”

  1. tumblr user pissed of at this fuckery

    Oh to hell with this stupid idea!!!
    The point of tumblr is not having all those social status you have in facebook!!
    if you did your research you would also know the opinion of users in Tumblr about Facebook. WE HATE IT. so saying FB should consider the idea of buying it to us tumblr users is an offense. for a site to be this popular and to be frequented is that users have to feel safe in the site, we do in tumblr, if facebook where to buy it i can assure you 80% of the current user would leave the site.

  2. Shayne A. Cassidy

    Facebook is a place to be found by people you’ve met and it’s used not to engage each other, but to simply see what they are doing, and because of that people don’t advertise who they are, instead they advertise who they want you to think you are. So you see people posting pictures to make themselves look pretty and quotes that are inspired to make themselves sound smart, but if that’s all you’re seeing then you’re just looking at a billboard.

    That’s where Tumblr is different, there’s a certain level of anonymity so you can show people who you are! because if they don’t like who you are it’s okay, you probably don’t know them anyway! And it’s not enough anonymity to allow people to be hateful or hurtful to each other because they can and will be ostracized for doing bad things, but it won’t be a definite thing if you admit your wrong doings and don’t repeat them then you’ll be forgiven. It’s this type of society that breeds creativity, because you’re more creative when you’re able to be yourself!

    So if Facebook does buy Tumblr it will be a shame, cause it will destroy everything that makes it great!

  3. TooManyTrees

    I’m not sure I understand what everyone’s getting so uptight about. If Facebook acquired Tumblr, it wouldn’t change Tumblr or make Tumblr become anything different necessarily. The only thing I don’t like about this is the idea of a huge company dominating the online market. Competition pressures for quality and gives other developers and designers opportunities.

    • There are moments when a company is bought out, but allowed to be itself by its new owner. However, more often than not, changes get made and they aren’t always good ones. The bulk of Tumblr users want nothing to to with Facebook because in their minds, it has become a monolith where we end up making friends with people whom we don’t necessarily want to be friends with: certain family members, co-workers, that friend of your friend whom you aren’t openly hostile towards, but still don’t want anything to do with, etc. It is in Facebook’s best interest for you to have lots of friends, but not necessarily for your own best interest to have all those friends.

  4. Even if you’d like to argue that buying Tumblr is good business sense for Facebook, you’re not looking at the intangibles: End product user experience. Anyone who knows anything about the average Tumblr user will tell you that it’s what we do for a purer social media experience INSTEAD of Facebook, combining the two would cause many Tumblr fanatics to simply quit. Personally, I would definitely be done with Tumblr forever if this happened. You can’t replicate the uniqueness of the Tumblr experience, you would just tarnish it by integrating Facebook. People leaving in droves would HAVE to matter, right?

  5. Vic Does Comics

    We use tumblr to blog,it’s only described as a micro-blogging site because some use it that way.I use to full blogging effect(!)as do most people over the age of 16.It’s not a social network,it’s a blogging platform,nothing even similar to FaceBook as any tumblr user will tell you,this is just an awful idea.Just because somebody can do something doesn’t mean they should & in this case they definitely shouldn’t.
    Out of my 300 Facebook friends 2 use tumblr.2!!That is all the statistics you need to prove this is a bad idea!

  6. Joseph Ratliff

    I hope this never happens, and I hope Facebook isn’t even thinking about it.

    The Tumblr culture is much different from Facebook, and the influence Facebook might have on that culture in acquiring Tumblr would have negative consequences IMO.

  7. John Doe

    >The only stumbling block is that David Karp and his backers may see the value of remaining independent and the potential for building something even larger than they have now.
    >stumbling block
    You’re kidding me, right? The dominant user-bases of both websites are about as compatible as oil and water.

  8. ‘haven’ = ‘type of engagement’ that facebook exec can not organically emulate or re-create. Tumblr has it’s own culture (as a community, what a shocker!) As the fb community gets older and calcifies, other communities will form around a thriving ‘open’ organic eco-system (i.e. Twitter.) Would you rather aggregate around the beautiful coral reefs of Twitter or the hardened reefs of fb?

  9. I have to agree with the previous posters. That holy ground of engagement that you speak of would be gone or greatly diminished were Facebook to acquire Tumblr — it’s a completely different animal and does not fit the Facebook model. It’s more akin to Twitter. Now, if Twitter were to acquire it … That would be interesting.

  10. Edson Portacio

    the problem with this logic is that, if fb acquires tumblr, it community will surely stop using tumblr. tumblr is a site where teenage girls go because their parents are on facebook. and they (parents) would always comment on the things that they post. what it is, is a haven. and how it should remain.

    • It’s a little more than that, but, yes, essentially. It’s a haven for outcasts, especially. For those who need a little support, or a place to speak their mind where they won’t be judged. A place where they can say and do and like what they want, and not worry about persecution.

  11. anononononon

    Oh hell no, facebook can’t get ahold of Tumblr. “The only stumbling block is that David Karp and his backers may see the value of remaining independent and the potential for building something even larger than they have now.”
    No, that’s not a stumbling block, that’s a smart-ass community not wanting to be bought out by a dumb-ass community.
    I’d honestly quit Tumblr if Zuckerberg bought David Karp out.

  12. Winchester

    If you actually listened to the community of tumblr, you would know that suggesting Facebook buy tumblr is equivalent to persuading the United States to use metric measurement. To say the least, Tumblr would be pissed.

  13. billy jack

    I hate facebook because they tell you who you can be friends with and who you cannot be friends with. I know people in Ireland and England when I was in the service and I have kept in touch with them by regular mail but I had to ask them to friend me on facebook because facebook told me that I didnt know them which is only one problem of many that facebook has. Faceboook also requires a phone number=what on earth for are they going to call me=half their polices are an invasion of my privacy so I dumped them

    • Robert Laracuente

      “I hate facebook because they tell you who you can be friends with and who you cannot be friends with.”
      Thy “suggest” people you may know. That is a far cry from actually pointing a gun at you and telling you to befriend someone.

      “…but I had to ask them to friend me on facebook because facebook told me that I didnt know them which is only one problem of many that facebook has. ”
      Sooo… you do or you don’t want them to tell you who to friend? You are confusing.

      “Faceboook also requires a phone number”
      Not true. It is only one of the many fields you can input if you wish to. They do, however, use the mobile phone number as part of a two step authentication for added security, something you would know if you actually read when they ask you for the number in the first place.