Can Bitbucket prevail in a Github-obsessed world?


Github may be the kingpin of source code repositories and versioning systems with more than 2 million individual developers aboard, but Atlassian is pushing its revamped Bitbucket as a good option for corporate developers. On Tuesday, the company plans to unveil a major facelift to Bitbucket as well as new features including in-line commenting.

While Github is the repository and versioning system of choice in the open-source world, Bitbucket — which supports both Git and Mercurial repositories — is strong in private repositories and private coding teams, said Jay Simons, president of Atlassian. Bitbucket customers include Zillow, Nordstrom, Best Buy(s bbuy), Verizon(s vz), Orbitz(s oow) and NASA, according to the company.

When GigaOM reported on a Github outage a few weeks ago, one commenter said that more developers will start looking for redundant repositories and that Bitbucket is a viable option. “It might be a good idea to mirror the central repo with multiple providers when it comes to [version control system] hosting,” commenter JohnB wrote. “It’s already becoming a best practice to do that with cloud hosting in general.”

Bitbucket user interface before (left) and after.

Atlassian also updated Stash, its 5-month-old on-premises Git-based code repository/version management offering, with support for pull requests. That means a developer using that piece of software at the time can be alerted of the update and sync up as needed. Stash targets companies that want to keep their code development inside the firewall.

While Github keeps a running count of active developers and repositories supported, Bitbucket is more interested in development teams and claims 20,000 of them use the service.  Bitbucket is free for teams of up to 5 developers who can use an unlimited number of repositories. There is a nominal $1 per user per month charge for each additional user. Github is free for open source developers but the company also offers price plans based on number of repositories used.

Other code repositories include Google Code and CodebaseHQ.



I use Bitbucket over Github because of the difference in pricing models. I only use Github to follow the projects hosted there :) but Bitbucket for all my work. Any work which I want to be public is on Bitbucket and Github. I simulpush updates to both


We use bitbucket extensively and find it offers all the features we need as a startup within the free tier (private code repo). If we want to share code back with the community as open source then we can use github


Bitbucket is the only major code forge that lets you host private repositories for free. The others are either paid or force you to only use them for open source projects (e.g. Google Code)


Thanks for the article. It was interesting to read about Attlassian making grand claims about revolution to team collaboration that their updates of BitBucket and Stash are bringing to the DVCS technologies because there are other vendors that are providing Git as well. For example we started testing Git offerings after reading an article about them on the PRWeb We actually find their toolset to be more comprehensive than that is offered by the Attlassian

Comments are closed.