What’s true for presidential campaigns is also true for patent lawsuits, it appears. To steal a phrase from political strategist James Carville, “It’s the economy, stupid.”
A handful of influential U.S. senators and representatives are backing Intel, HP and Apple in their patent battle against intellectual property firm X2Y Attenuators, which is asking the U.S. International Trade Commission to ban imports of certain Intel-powered computers. According to an article by Jenna Greene in the National Law Journal, the agency’s decision might be shaped by pressure from those congresspeople, who are worried that an import ban could negatively affect the U.S. economy.
In terms of trying to build a strong economy for the future, this is a good start. Going forward, however, concern for the economy should inform other elements of technology law, even those outside the patent system.
Intel and the ITC
In the Intel case (a limited version of which is also being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania) , plaintiff X2Y — a firm that Intel characterizes as a patent troll — is seeking a ban on the import of all computers containing Intel’s Core i3, i5, i7 and Xeon processors. In case you were wondering, that encompasses nearly every laptop and desktop that HP and Apple sell.
A ban would mean a lot of lost business for Intel — thus the lobbying from Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and every other senator and representative from Oregon, Arizona and New Mexico. Intel employs tens of thousands of employees in those states, and they’d like to see those jobs stay. Of course, a ban would also affect companies such as HP and Apple that build computers containing the chips, as well as the retail stores that sell them.
However, while the ITC has the power to prohibit infringing products from entering the United States, it also has the flexibility to decide that such a prohibition would create more problems than it solves. The governing statute allows for a prohibition on imports “unless after considering the effect of such exclusion upon the public health and welfare, competition conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, it finds that such articles should not be excluded from entry.”
And while they’re also arguing the merits of the patent-infringement claim, attorneys for Intel, HP and Apple are also doing their part to make the “public health and welfare” case for their clients. In her National Law Journal article, Greene notes that Intel and HP attorneys are trying to paint a picture of X2Y as a patent troll that employees 10 people and has never made anything. Intel, on the other hand, invented the microprocessor and, according to a letter sent by one attorney to the ITC, “Without computer systems powered by Intel microprocessors, neither society nor business as we know it could be conducted.”
Greene says the ITC last used the “public health and welfare” exception in 1984, but is presently hearing another case — brought by Motorola Mobility against Microsoft’s and involving the Xbox 360 gaming console — in which numerous congresspeople lobbied the ITC on both sides of the issue. This could just be the start, she notes, because the ITC is going to start hearing more cases with potentially serious repercussions, and Congress ultimately controls the ITC’s budget.
It’s not just patents
If Congress is serious about building a strong, 21st-century economy, though, it will use its power to do more than just lobby in the occassional international patent lawsuit. Information technology is huge business, and the United States is home to many of its biggest players.
Apple is now the most-valuable corporation in U.S. history and singlehandedly changed the face of mobile phones. Google, Facebook and thousands of startups are rethinking how consumers interact with the web. Generally speaking, advances in IT are changing everything from the way we bursh our teeth to the way we insure our crops. It’s that powerful.
Getting the right laws in place around issues such as data governance, privacy, net neutrality and software patents could go a long way toward ensuring these companies continue to flourish and add new jobs. Sure, it can be difficult to draft forward-thinking legislation, and there certainly are competing interests at play representing both corporations and consumers. But if the economy is really what matters, then we’re going to need some smart laws.
Feature image courtesy of Shutterstock user Luna Vandoorne.