Blog Post

Judge orders Oracle, Google to disclose paid journalists and bloggers

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

In a surprise order, U.S. District Judge William Alsup said “the court is concerned” that Oracle (s orcl) and Google (s goog) may have hired authors to comment about their ongoing court case. Now, Judge Alsup wants the parties to submit a list of their paid propagandists.

The unusual request comes months after the “World Series” of intellectual property trials in which Oracle unsuccessfully sued Google for billions.

The trial was remarkable not only for the large damage figures but for Oracle’s decision to hire Florian Mueller, a self-described “patent analyst” who also takes money from Microsoft. In his FOSS Patents blog, Mueller wrote a series of one-sided posts over the course of the trial such as “Oracle Java patent rises like Ph0enix from the ashes.”

Despite a lack of legal training, Mueller holds himself out as a patent expert to the media and typically does not disclose that he is paid by the companies he reports on (he disclosed an Oracle relationship briefly at the outset of the trial but did not do so subsequently or to other media). Mueller has also blocked me and other journalists who have questioned his impartiality from viewing his Twitter feed.

Alsup does not provide detailed reasons for his order, which was first reported in a tweet by Reuters reporter Dan Levine, but does state that the information would be useful on appeal:

to make clear whether any treatise, article, commentary or analysis on the issues posed by this case are possibly influenced by financial relationships to the parties or counsel.

In the larger picture, Alsup may be calling attention to the growing phenomenon of astro-turfing — individuals or groups who receive money to pose as voices of the public interest. The Federal Trade Commission has in the past fined a company for failing to disclose paid endorsements. An FTC official told paidContent earlier this year that endorsers must disclose all material facts, including when they comment about a competitor.

Here is Judge Alsup’s order:

Blogger Order

(Image by Imagelabs via Shutterstock)

13 Responses to “Judge orders Oracle, Google to disclose paid journalists and bloggers”

  1. Paul Ivice

    Yes, as a journalist who writes objectively and is paid only by the publication I am offended by those who pose as journalists but are being paid for their opinions whether it is a tech blogger a restaurant reviewer or a movie critic. Part of Truth in Advertising should be the inform the public when something is advertising and not objective journalism. To allow people being paid to express certain opinions to mix in with objective journalists threatens the integrity of my profession.

  2. LOVE it. Get rid of all the media whores, posers, and parasites and let’s get back to making money the old fashioned way in this business. EARN IT.

  3. This article reeks of sour grapes.

    As an analyst and consultant, Mueller is a chronicler knowledgeable enough to be paid for providing his well informed opinion.

    You would be better off pointing out any clear bias in his reporting of facts instead of ad hominem trolling.

    It’s his business how he makes a living.
    He could be a drug dealer for all I care when his coverage is head and shoulders above the typical clueless churnalism.

    • Thanks for your comment, George. Yes, I’m no fan of Florian Mueller but it’s not the result of sour grapes. My problem is that his imperious propaganda distorts public understanding of an important and difficult issue. And don’t give too much credit to his coverage; it’s my understanding that counsel for his clients provide him with annotated court briefs on which he stamps his spurious opinions (while typically assuring his readers that they don’t have to read the briefs since he does it for them). I also dislike his habit of responding to people who question his ethics by asserting that he knows far more than them. He is a fraud and a humbug.

    • ThinkOpenly

      It’s surprising that you think Mueller’s coverage is “head and shoulders above” anything, when he’s so often biased and clearly wrong (cf. SCO, Oracle). And now we may find out how much he was paid to be that way. Groklaw is much more prescient.

  4. Tough order to get right.

    I can see that sites like this one run ads from Google advertising networks (eg “AdChoices”) and presumably get paid by Google to do so.

    Does this count this as influence and should they disclose this relationship?