40. Monster Worldwide
Advertising, United States (Public)
Advertisement
x
Digital Content Revenue
$1,040,000,000 (100% of total)
Digital Snapshot
Monster started out as an online job board and has grown to encompass a variety of digital career services, with global career bookings up 18 percent in 2011.
Key Move
Early this year, Monster nabbed a $20-million, four-year contract with the UK government — its largest international transaction ever, showing its increasing focus on global expansion.
Our Methodology
Monster reported its annual revenues, consisting of three categories: Careers-North America, Careers-International, and Advertising & Fees.
Source: Company disclosure.
— Laura Owen
Tripadvisor is all digital media and is around $750 M in yearly revenue and should likely be included on this list.
Good Job Mr. Robert
I am a freelancing SEO and SMM professional. The recent update of google penguin and panda has changed the SEO pattern radically.
And google has done this algorithm change to spread their digital ads business nothing than this.
I really hate this because, making loss to others for their own profit is a Digital Crime and Weak Business policy from my view. Check my site Arsenal Highlights
Hey i just find out the Way to Keep Safe our Wallet
[I found a great app called walletguard that keeps my child from making in-app purchases on my droid! It was less than a buck, and has saved me hundreds! No more surprise credit card bills from those “free” games….]
You can download it by clicking below Link
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=gray.walletguard.topactivity
i know a thing that advertising is the best method to rank your own thing in front of the people
If you want to rank things on revenue, fine. But then don’t call it the ‘Most Succesful List’: Microsoft might ‘make’ $3.9b on digital content, but it also loses around $3b every year too.
Thomson Reuters?! After Eikon failure & loss of half staff..? Are you mad.
What makes me wonder ist, taht there under th etzop 50 is not a single company from Germany. Germany is the biggest market in EUropa, but no German Hundefutter among the big player. I don’t buy that.
kenhasselblad – Axel Springer is at #33.
You might want to add Hubert Burda Media (Germany). Digital Revenue 2011: 937.2 Euro (see http://www.hubert-burda-media.de/chameleon/outbox/public/86cee9e5-720f-fba9-3dc2-33982b8b5069/Media_in_Transition_2012.pdf , page 131)
Best, Sebastian (Hubert Burda Media)
Thanks for the pointer on Valve.
Groupon/Monster/eBay – yes, all interestingly debatable.
I think this is a terrific list despite any reservations some people have about the methodology. It really demonstrates the huge growth potential of digital media companies in some of the emerging markets. Also, as a scientist – I note Elsevier being top 5 in revenue (Elsevier is publisher behind many of the top scientific journals).
Google+ is a big strategy shift for Google and could, if executed well, become another digital revenue stream ti augment the search cash cow.
+1 on looking into Valve
What about Valve and their digital games platform: Steam. I know they are a private company and figures are hard to come by but in 2011 Forbes reckoned they have more than 50% of the 4 billion dollar PC games download market. That is huge.
I would really love to see Paid Content do some investigation on Valve because they are an incredibly innovative company who really push digital retailing to its limits.
Groupon and Monster are’t really media companies. I’m not even sure that ad agencies should qualify in the same category as Viacom or Time Warner. Totally different business model.
Why is eBay not in this list? They have an ad business on eBay.com and their classified sites, and the seller fees they collect are essentially paid ads since the platform doesn’t handle the items. This list is also missing Alibaba Group from China (including Taobao), and Gree from Japan.
Does this list distinguish between companies that charge users for access and those that do not, or was that weighted in the rankings?
“Creating this list wasn’t easy.”
I can imagine. Manipulating the numbers to get Microsoft into the top 10 must have been really tough.
lol. but seriously, they didn’t manipulate anything. this info is from public data on revenues and their entire methodology is described here: http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/31/pc50/52/
Yes, but they still should have had time to comment on the fact that MSN is no longer part of Microsoft and hasn’t been for several weeks. Sure that means they get to claim the revenue for this year but at least point out that they won’t have it next year.
AlanL:
The Microsoft profile page says: “Microsoft recently sold its stake in MSNBC.com.”
And the research period for all companies here predates that sale.
Any revenue change as a result will be reflected in next year’s pC50.
Thanks.