Gigaom Gigaom Logo Skip Navigation
  • Newsletter
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
  • Sign in
  • Subscribe
Gigaom Logo
Skip Navigation
  • By opting into our newsletter, you agree to receiving news, updates and event invites from Gigaom and our sponsors.
  • Newsletter
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Topics
  • Analysts
  • Webinars
  • Research
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
  • Analysts
  • Webinars
  • Research
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • Cloud
  • Data & Analytics
  • DevOps
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Security and Risk
  • Research Calendar
  • GigaBrief
  • DeepDive
Stay on top of emerging trends impacting your industry with GigaOm Research Subscribe

Blog Post

Carriers ambivalent about sharing airwaves with the feds

Kevin Fitchard Mar 30, 2012 - 1:07 PM CDT
  • Internet of Things
  • Technology
cellulartower3
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Post

When federal spectrum managers on Tuesday recommended that carriers and government agencies share a huge block of airwaves, operators and mobile industry groups lauded the administration’s efforts to clear more federal spectrum for commercial use. But speaking to GigaOm, the trade group representing the major U.S. operators offered up a more sobering view on why sharing frequencies won’t work.

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) proposed that 95 MHz currently being used by 20 different federal agencies be made available to carriers, but that a good portion of be turned into what is effectively an airwave time share. The military and other agencies would use it for their communications needs at certain times and specific locations, but whenever and wherever they were offline, carriers would be free to use the spectrum for mobile broadband.

CTIA VP of regulatory affairs Chris Guttman-McCabe said that sharing spectrum is a great idea in principle, but logistically it will be very difficult to pull off. Carriers simply can’t turn capacity on and off on a schedule or leave big gaping bandwidth holes in their coverage if they’re going to adequately serve their customers, Guttman-McCabe said.

He did concede there would be some circumstances where sharing would work. For instance, a government satellite network with a dozen ground stations in remote locations would be easy to work around, Guttman-McCabe said. In a such a scenario, carriers would create exclusion zones around the satellite uplink sites to prevent interference, but as long as zones weren’t located near metropolitan areas – where capacity is most needed – it wouldn’t be a problem, he said.

The big problem, Guttman-McCabe said, is time-based sharing. Unless the government limited its use to the wee hours of the night, carriers couldn’t depend on using that spectrum when they most need it. While CTIA is definitely willing to work with government where sharing is a logistically feasible, Guttman-McCabe said, it wants it to be the option of last resort.

“We want to make sure that the balance is in favor of clearing rather than sharing spectrum, with the recognition that some sharing is inevitable,” Guttman-McCabe said. “We understand that there are some government services that need to remain in the band. … I do have a fear, though, that the default approach is going to be to leave government users in place and have us work around them.”

Slicing and dicing the airwaves

The NTIA administrator Larry Strickling has pointed out that the carriers aren’t the only ones who need spectrum. Just as the consumer and business demand for mobile broadband skyrocketed so has the government’s, and everyone is clamoring for the same scarce airwaves. Clearing entirely the 95 MHz block,  which spans 1755-1850 MHz, could cost as much as $18 billion, could take as much as decade, and would require the relocation of highly sensitive military applications such as the air combat training systems. While Strickling said there are some frequencies that would be easier to clear — such as the microwave transmission bands — for much of that spectrum, sharing would be a much more cost-efficient way of alleviating the capacity crunch.

The NTIA is proposing that emerging technologies such as LTE-Advanced would make such sharing possible. LTE-Advanced uses a technique called carrier aggregation, which lashes together frequencies from all over the band map, while still preserving the integrity of government systems interleaved among them. The technology could even be used dynamically, grabbing government bandwidth when not in use by the feds and adding that capacity temporarily to the network. An NTIA spokesperson told us via email:

“This forward-looking approach, involving a combination of sharing spectrum and relocating federal users, will enable spectrum to be put to commercial use more quickly and in a more cost-efficient manner than the old method for making spectrum available. NTIA will convene industry and federal agencies, as quickly as possible, to move forward with making this spectrum commercially available while protecting critical federal missions.”

CTIA, however, isn’t questioning whether sharing is technically possible, but rather its commercially feasible, given the constraints operators would work under. According to Guttman-McCabe, CTIA would rather the NTIA try to consolidate as many government users as possible into specific blocks and give the remaining spectrum up for commercial use. The debate is likely to play out as the first block the government has identified for clearance: the 1755-1780 MHz, which must be auctioned off by 2015.

Tower Image courtesy of Flickr user Nikhil Verma; Washington Image courtesy of humbertomoreno flickr creative commons.

Advertisement
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Post
  • air combat training systems
  • auction
  • aws
  • Chris Guttman-McCabe
  • Defense department
  • government spectrum
  • mobile broadband
  • spectrum
  • spectrum managment
  • spectrum policy
  • spectrum sharing
Advertisement
Advertisement

More Posts

creative

Blog

The Future of Software Innovation? Hardware-Enabled AI & ML Innovation

Greg Fisher Apr 1, 2019 - 10:12 AM CDT
4 Min Read More
Colt-Summary_1-1500×775

Getting the basics right

Five questions for… Keri Gilder, Chief Commercial Officer, Colt Technology Services. Can Connectivity be linked to Customer Experience?

Jon Collins Mar 4, 2019 - 3:54 AM CST
6 Min Read More
Sponsored by Colt Logo
abstract telecommunications technology digital pattern background

A GigaOm Research Infographic

GigaOm Infographic: Connectivity and Customer Experience

Jon Collins Feb 25, 2019 - 7:00 AM CST
0.5 Min Read More
Advertisement

Related

Digital security concept. Digital padlock security data with connections on dark blue technology background.

Business & Technology Impact Report

Selecting and Adopting a Security-Standards Framework

Thom Langford
AI (Artificial Intelligence) and electronics concept.

On Demand Webinar

AI at the Edge: Creating an Intelligent IoT Ecosystem

Mike Jennett Sep 4, 2019 - 12:00 PM CDT
Watch
Sponsored by
CIO Speaks_Episode 10_Voice Headshot Card

Podcast Episode

CIO Speaks – Episode 10: A Conversation with David Chou of Constellation Research

Steve Ginsberg
Listen
Advertisement

Podcasts

Podcast

Voices in AI

Byron Reese
  • iTunes
  • Google Play
  • Spotify
  • Stitcher
  • RSS
Listen
voices-in-data-storage-cover

Podcast

Voices in Data Storage

Enrico Signoretti
  • iTunes
  • Google Play
  • Spotify
  • Stitcher
  • RSS
Listen

More Podcasts

Advertisement
  • Topics
  • Analysts
  • Webinars
  • Research
  • Podcasts
Gigaom
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS Feed
  • Newsletter
2019 GigaOm All Rights Reserved.
This website uses cookies; by continuing you are a agreeing to our Privacy Policy Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Necessary
Always Enabled

This is an necessary category.

Save & Accept