Blog Post

YouTube & its content discovery paradox

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

For years, YouTube (s GOOG) has worked to shake the perception that it is all about amateurish user-generated content. It’s hardly just the home of dogs on skateboards and stupid human tricks anymore, as the amount of professional and semi-professional content being produced and uploaded increases. But now that it’s got the content, it needs to get better about helping viewers find it.

YouTube is betting big on original programming, reportedly spending more than $100 million on 100 channels of professional content. Those channels are mostly being focused on various verticals: action sports, for instance, or food or fashion. But while it’s investing in quality, Kamangar told the audience at the D:Dive Into Media conference this week that it’s still too hard to find the stuff people want to watch.

To fix this, YouTube also redesigned its website to highlight content that is relevant to its users. The idea behind the redesign, according to Kamangar, is that once users have selected channels that interest them, they will be shown the newest videos of interest to them. In the same way that viewers typically pick between a handful of favorite TV stations, allowing users to self-select channels could potentially keep them coming back.

It’s a step in the right direction, but it’s not perfect. As I’ve noted before, the biggest issue is one of discovery: Once users have chosen the channels that they’d like to subscribe to, it’s difficult to find new content that might be relevant to their interests. Suggested channels — including its featured new channels — are hidden off to the side and below the fold.

Kamangar admitted Tuesday that discovery is still a problem for YouTube. “Google historically has been a search company, so for us to get the discovery and recommendations right, it’s a big challenge. But it’s the kind of challenge that the engineers at Google absolutely love,” Kamagar said.

YouTube is the second-biggest search engine in the world, behind parent Google. But it’s one thing to serve up the right video when a viewer searches for it. It’s a whole other thing to anticipate what a viewer wants to see and help them find it. That’s something YouTube will need to get better at, especially as it tries to increase the average session time that users are staying online for.

The site has a massive number of users stopping by the site every day, but few of them stick around for very long. That’s something the company has been struggling with since its inception. If it’s going to become a bigger competitive threat to traditional programmers, it’ll need to step beyond the hunt-and-peck process of video search and provide better discovery tools.

6 Responses to “YouTube & its content discovery paradox”

  1. If Youtube is serious about wanting people to stay longer and wishing to attract more professional, but original content, then they need to start looking at the TV way of doing things and invest in the film makers and programme producers.

    Making content that is engaging and will hold an audiences’ attention for more than a couple of minutes is expensive in either the film makers time or money and the rewards need to be there.

    Also film makers are not necessarily good marketeers. There stills are in producing good content. The Youtube partnership should be one that helps ones another and the video hosting company needs to promote and market the video producers content much better.

    Richard Vobes – The Bald Explorer (History and Travel Videos)

  2. Aimee Davison

    I recently created the YouTube Association to unite creators and solve the content categorization and discovery problem. We intend to identify, classify and catalog YouTube channels across multiple verticals and territories. and; @ytassociation on Twitter. If Google wants to speak with us, as we are self-organizing, even better. – Aimee Davison [email protected]

  3. “But it’s the kind of challenge that the engineers at Google absolutely love”

    And there’s the problem with google in a nutshell. This is a design problem, a user experience problem, a human factors problem. Not an engineering problem.

    • While you’re correct that great design will be critical to solving this, great search technology is required as well. Solving for both head and tail content is huge. As is the challenge of constantly changing inventory. In some categories freshness will matter a lot othrrs not at all. But at this point, any improvements are appreciated, cuz I can’t find sh#t.