Blog Post

There’s room for both tablets and e-readers (for now)

Stay on Top of Emerging Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

Although there’s some overlapping functionality between tablets and e-readers, it doesn’t seem to set up either device to cannibalize the other; at least not yet. Pew Research noted on Monday that ownership of each nearly doubled this holiday season, indicating some consumers are content to focus solely on reading while others want a device that supplements digital content with apps, web access and email.

Pew points out both Amazon(s amzn) and Barnes & Noble(s bks) introduced new, low-cost tablets this past holiday season. These would fall into the “tablet” category even though both are e-reading devices at their core; running on Android (s goog) opens up additional tablet-like features. As a result, these relatively inexpensive devices surely helped boost tablet sales during the holidays.

But this gain may have been offset by lower-cost E-Ink digital reading devices. Again, Amazon and Barnes & Noble rolled out new e-readers to expand their product lines, with some prices starting as low as $79; far less than the $199 it costs for an Amazon Kindle Fire, for example.

As long as there’s a significant price difference between the two device types, I suspect there will be little, if any cannibalization. If Amazon were to further subsidize the Kindle Fire with some product ads throughout the tablet, however, that could have a significant impact. E-Ink readers will always have dedicated fans, but a $149 Kindle Fire, for example, would give tablet sales a nice boost.

3 Responses to “There’s room for both tablets and e-readers (for now)”

  1. +1 to what Jon said.

    I have both a Sony PRS505 ereader and Cyanogenmodded Nook Color. I read novels on the Sony. On the tablet, I read reference-type books, review office docs, browse the web, do email, etc. I often carry both out every day. I have installed the Kindle, Nook, Google Books, and another generic epub reader or two on the tablet and have books loaded in most of these.

    (I don’t like reading reference-type books on my ereader due to limited ability to jump around, my typical method of reading such books compared to linearly for novels.)

    I was hoping for a Pixel Qi, Mirasol, or similar display on a good tablet from a good company, ideally in 7″ and 10″ sizes. I’d buy one in a heartbeat to eliminate my need for two devices.

  2. Richard Garrett

    For a long while I had two eReaders (Kindle second generation and Nook Color) and an iPad — not to mention Kindle and BN apps on my Android cell phone. For now, having sold the NC and iPad, I’ve settled on the Kindle as my go-to reading device. I discovered that I like the focus on reading that the Kindle encourages (no distractions/temptations to play music, check email, surf, etc). Going forward, I will no doubt get another tablet (iPad 3 probably), but will continue to use the Kindle (wishing for only two additional features…a backlight and possibly touchscreen (again probably a Kindle) because turning the pages using a button on my Kindle creates just enough rhythmic noise to be a bit annoying in a quiet bedroom.

  3. Jon Friedman

    I own both an e-ink reader and a 7″ tablet. I find they are both great devices for what they do. Basically the e-reader is easier to read on. I have a do read on my tablet, but I find it does strain my eyes a bit. Also the battery life just doesn’t compare. But that being said I love my tablet. For roughly 90% of what I need a full blown computer for my tablet works fine. I tend to go home at night and not even turn on my computer.

    I really hope that both devices stay viable. Unless there is a convergence where we see e-ink and an LED display on a tablet.