Apple reportedly using new display tech for iPad 3

18 Comments

Supply chain reports released on Friday indicate that Apple (s aapl) will opt for indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO) instead of in-plane switching (IPS) display panels for its upcoming iPad 3. The change would provide benefits in terms of energy consumption, cost reduction and improved resolution.

The report, which comes via DigiTimes, suggests that Apple will source the IGZO panels from Sharp and that they will allow Cupertino to release an iPad 3 that has “full HD” displays without added bulk, something some reports have suggested wasn’t possible with IPS LCD technology.

DigiTimes doesn’t specify the resolution of the displays, and its reputation is somewhat tarnished by claims on Thursday that new iPads could be unveiled at Macworld/iWorld in January. But IGZO displays actually make a lot of sense for Apple, and this isn’t the first time we have heard the company might use them.

Back in November, MacRumors noted that Jefferies analyst Peter Misek claimed that Apple would use the IGZO panels in the iPad 3 in order to achieve 330 ppi resolution (which would exceed the 326 ppi of the iPhone 4 and make for a true Retina Display) while avoiding the use of IPS and dual-bar LED lighting. That would allow the iPad 3 to be as thin or thinner than its predecessor and also offset battery costs related to improved screen resolution, Misek said.

DigiTimes may be hit-and-miss with its supply chain rumblings, but this report makes a lot of sense in terms of Apple’s likely goals with next-generation iPad technology. As long as the IGZO technology looks good, battery cost reductions and a decreased physical footprint definitely seem like things Apple would want to pursue. A thicker iPad 3 with worse battery life than the iPad 2 definitely doesn’t seem like an ideal successor to Apple’s tablet legacy, in any case.

18 Comments

Shawn King

“DigiTimes may be hit-and-miss with its supply chain rumblings…”

I started StupidAppleRumors.com because of sites like Digitimes and comments like the above.

We’ve been tracking their Apple rumors for six months. In that time frame, they have posted 24 Apple rumors. Take a guess at how many have been proven true….

Zero.

None.

Zip.

Nada.

Bupkiss….

So, to contradict the above sentence, Digitimes is “miss and miss” when it comes to Apple rumors. Reputable sites should stop using them as sources for their stories.

Christopher Wade Brown

this webspage is terrible i cant close the apple poppup…

erfghjJKL

The pop up is extremely annoying. I will be avoiding this site from now on.

Corey Gold

We are headed to a world were no data or software will be hosted on your computing platform. All data and software will be in clouds (and future advancements of clouds). A person’s computer device will simply be a portal to to cloud – http://www.aces4ce.com

Corey Gold

IGZO makes perfect sense and is the natural progression for the iPad. It will make the display worth watching real video for the full experience. I am not surirised by this move. 330 ppi gives amazing clarity and depth. Good choice – if the iPad3 also adds some additional new benefits – then I will upgrade again.

Abercrombie

“With iCloud users can store photos, apps, calendars and access songs on iTunes without having them to store in the phone’s memory”… quite right… so give all your stuff to someone else to look after (you do trust them don’t you?), but don’t moan when your internet connection goes down or there’s a problem with their system and you can’t get at anything! Anyone remember RIM?

Pepe Ronnie

Well duh, with 65 bil in cash I can’t imagine apple’s R&D is sitting around betting on obsolete battery draining amoled displays. Those are for kids

ipawn

WTF, you are all supposed to comment on ipad3 but you talked about the pop=ups. GTFOH.

For ipad-3 it’s a long wait. they don’t even start the production. If someone lives out of the US, it’s at least a year of waiting.

Armand Cerna

I like the popus at the bottom. They help me find more interesting articles,

Anonymous Guest

I think the point is most sites let you close them. This site does not.

Armand Cerna

I like the popus at the bottom. it helps me discover interesting related atricles.

gill bates

This site sucks – with the pop-ups at the bottom that CANNOT be closed.

Bill Who

I think the site is great and never have to deal with pop up or under or over ads. But sometimes those things do make it through the advertiser channels. I bet if you emailed the ops of the site with details of the ad they would have it removed.

Kev

the site doesnt suck. you just need to get a bigger monitor so the popups dont obstruct your reading. problem solved.

Comments are closed.