Blog Post

12 tech leaders’ resolutions for 2012

Respect the physical world

By Philip Rosedale, Co-Founder, Coffee & Power (as told to Colleen Taylor)

Philip Rosedale is the CEO of Coffee and Power, a marketplace for small jobs. He is best known as the founder of Linden Labs, the Internet company that runs the virtual world Second Life. We wanted to know what his plans for his new company are and how he plans to stay focused in the fast-paced startup world.

I think entrepreneurs should think bigger. I think there’s too much being made out of this false dichotomy — you’re either trying to add value to the world, or you just want to make money. Mostly, of course, you want to make money. But try to make money in a way that is epic and awesome. To do that you have to think really, really really big, and way outside the box. But if you want to get funded, you have to be prepared to prove those ideas on an iterative, short-term basis.

As an entrepreneur who’s been in it for a long time, I’m surprised by how much the investment in big ideas has gone down. It’s easy to get a little funding, but it’s harder to get more. If you’re working on something really crazy like Coffee and Power, it’s really hard. Investors ask, “Who’s the customer, and what existing market are you servicing?” We said, “We don’t know, and there isn’t one.” For investors, there are so many great opportunities in companies that have answers to both those questions. But there’s so much greater opportunity to make a real impact in companies that don’t have answers to those questions.

The tools and development environments available today, and the state of the Internet itself is making everything so easy to do that we’re all gravitating to the easy — and for good reason. A lot of those companies will succeed. You could spend your whole life working on moving every desktop application or e-commerce site to mobile and do really well. Hardware manufacturers are coming out with new versions of devices that are so much more powerful than what came out just one year ago, and software engineers haven’t even come close to exploiting the earlier versions yet.

The rate of technological change is accelerating so rapidly that the belief that you’re in control is becoming more and more ridiculous. The idea of putting out a product first, seeing what people do with it and iterating based on that is talked about a lot in product development. I think we need to trust a more chaotic process in every aspect of our business — do it in marketing, in finance, in legal. There’s wisdom in letting go and trusting people. I think giving up control in ways that you find deeply uncomfortable as an entrepreneur, like giving up the concept of your brand, is a very powerful idea. The reality is you don’t have a choice — the world is about to do it for you.

Coffee and Power is, by its very nature, a people driven thing, and part of what we want to be is a platform for people to do work. An amazing thing about Second Life was that it got people to do different types of work. People would go into Second Life as an accountant and they’d come out as an architect. They’d explore this interest in Second Life and then literally go out and get their architecture degree in the real world. With Coffee and Power, we wanted to create an environment that gets people to do that same thing without having a 3D virtual world. Here, we created a physical space where people can meet people they haven’t met before and do jobs they haven’t done before. Now, 60 percent of the jobs on Coffee and Power are done virtually, but the face-to-face stuff that happens is really neat.

There’s a very real reason for doing things physically. For example, if you want someone to review your website’s user interface, sitting down with the designer makes that transaction more valuable. Because they can say, “What are you trying to build? Well, let me play with it. Oh, you’ve got to put this up there.” That’s something that has to happen face to face, and it couldn’t happen in Second Life. We’ve kind of come all the way, from pure virtual to physical.

One personal resolution is to keep meditating. I’ve been meditating for three and a half years, and it’s made a big difference. I practice every day, through a combo of sitting down, like the monks do, and also through a daily aerobic workout. We’re all going to have to learn to meditate. Technology is delivering more information per unit of time than we can handle. It’s becoming more and more obvious that we don’t multitask. We think we do, but the more we try to multitask, the less effectively we do everything.

Some people say we should shut off the machines completely, the kind of Luddite perspective. I think you should actually let that assault on your senses happen, and in fact embrace it, surrender to it. But then be very disciplined about taking time every day, or every few hours, to totally remove the stimulus, so that it has time to settle in your brain, like a snow globe.

42 Responses to “12 tech leaders’ resolutions for 2012”

  1. Daniel Mbure

    I like the human face to technology bit and the acceptance that technology can become overwhelming. I think more tech entrepreneurs should help users deal with the deluge of information rather than adding even more information to an already overflowing knowledge stream. As someone once said, and the big data debate supports this, the future belongs to the information curators, not the information creators.

    • alex vernon

      I actually like that as an entrepreneur, he brought up physical activity. I find that its critical to get a good oxygen rush in at least a couple times a week as well.

  2. This gave me some ideas. Now, I’m having trouble with my resolution: Be a better manager or be a better leader? I think there’s a difference between the two. I would love to see technology humanized this year and we have a lot to clean up amidst all that clutter. More success to all this 2012!

  3. panjwani_ajay

    dans story reminds me of the problem of electricity grids where half the power gets wasted in transmission. in telecom too, there is no need for owners of networks to provide services too. have number portability and have a separation between network ownership and service providers

  4. panjwani_ajay

    pixel qi is following apple model – designed in us made in china. that indicates the onset of higher optimizations for higher margins. and that is where the conspiracy lies. those mit stanford phds were always at hand watching china under optimize all over the place. only when the margins got wafer thin did these phds decide to add intellectual property margins

  5. Carol Wyatt

    GREAT!!! I agree with you about women being more hesitant. I also want women to push for society to accept us as Mom’s and Dad’s with lives. The American workplace is not child friendly and we shouldn’t have to sacrifice our family’s quality of life for careers, or vice versa. At least this is the case in the entertainment industry. I hope we can stop working crazy hours and spend some time with our families and friends.

  6. Peter Mullen

    Nice post Mr. Hesse and I’ve been a loyal Sprint customer since the year 2000 but you guys still screw your existing customers under contract and always favor new customers when new handsets come out (which is pretty rare). But, you guys still are the best of the big 3 in the US.

  7. If you look at the world through a pair of eyes then naturally we surmise that there might be more considering the lack of use of the most part of our brain…then stating that we might neurologically partake of data and images in the future is plainly stating the bleedin obvious.

    I see that we strive forward as a collective group of engineers trying to convince the world that 3D is the next step…when it may damage eyes to the point that we had better, and pretty soon find the answer to the absorbtion of images neurologically because we may be on route blinding a generation….The folly of the human being and the “no sir nicotine is not harmful” attitude of businessmen is a frightening legacy!

  8. panjwani_ajay

    we are facing tech evolution so fast that we are increasingly lagging behind. in such a situation, the best thing we can do and should do is work from first principles. in an ideal business setup, there is no profit or loss. also we need to separate the goals from the paths. these three form the basis of all my thinking about how technology can improve our lives FP / IB / GP

  9. panjwani_ajay

    it does not matter if the net is open or closed, what matters is the extent of run time criteria vs compile time criteria. we live in a world of power gradients, which are maintained indicating the absense of a countervailing force. this is possible if resistance buildup is nipped in the bud, which requires run time criteria.

  10. “A few years ago, Google started favoring some of their own websites over others. They left a path of scorched earth through many prominent businesses and publishers.”

    It’s fairly irresponsible to say this without justifying it. Which Google services are you referring to, and which businesses were hurt by it? There are many individual cases you could be referring to, with varying degrees of debatability.

  11. Wilson Zorn

    GREAT article. But linking from the “12 tech leaders’ resolutions” was both inaccurate (given there are no “resolutions” here) and unnecessary (as I was enticed to come to the article via an NRF newsletter linking this and that newsletter gave a quote from this particular article – I have no interest in reading tech leaders’ resolutions).

    Further it was difficult to get to this page from the page introducing the 12 leaders’ resolutions, as the text on the photos was in many cases unreadable, especially for this Mullenweg article. I got to this as I could make out the “Open” word and guessed this was Mullenweg’s likeness.

    Second attempt at commenting – seriously, my comment doesn’t appear and no notification like “pending approval of the comment” because I chose “guest” instead of one of the commercial services? Fine, I logged in via Twitter this time. But this really needs to fix its messaging and/or technical issues (I’m not sure which it is). Apologies if this resulted in a double post.

  12. A GREAT article but please note that grouping it under “leaders’ New Year’s resolutions” was wholly unnecessary and misleading (given there were no resolutions, and anyway I did not go to this article because of “resolutions” but rather because I saw a quote from the article in an NRF newsletter regarding the increasingly closed nature of the web). And it wasn’t easy to get here from the page that showed the photos because the text was poorly printed in contrast so that many of the names I couldn’t read, I happened to guess correctly at Matt Mullenweg’s likeness.

  13. Philip has a lot to say , but there is a silicon valley assumption hidden here that no company is valid unless it has VC investment and makes a quick exit. Anything else is derided as a “lifestyle business.” When you take VC or angel money you instantly change who your customer is. No longer are you solving a problem for a million people, you are now solving an investment criteria for a very few investors. Don’t do it. Find a small enough piece of the market/problem and using you own funding go to market and grow organically. Keep focused on your real customer. They have far more money that any VC. Only take money from friends and family who are giving you money because they love you. Think Bill Gates, not Google. The math is rather simple. A typical VC funds less than 1 in 100 business plans that they see and 90% of their funded businesses are failures (by VC standards). Why would you want to twisted your life’s work for such slim odds.

  14. Good Article….But I think that looking for funding may not be synonymous with technology that brings about “real” and “Lasting” change.
    Real and Lasting change could involve putting the “Community” that adds value to your service first in a way that may eventually break the cycle of inequitable distribution of monetary value to the “Corp”

  15. I have always enjoyed McNealy. Cool dude. But come on! You left SUNW because the stock was crashing and you wanted out of a dying business…Not because you wanted to spend time with your kids,

  16. Why shouldn’t they? ABC advertises ABC shows and not NBC or CBS’s. This is one reason why some people and companies create large networks (whether they are broadcast or information networks); to help promote each other.

  17. “A few years ago, Google started favoring some of their own websites over others” I am happy for google to provide me an option “do you want our services to be displayed first or not” and I’d check that blindly because so far, google’s services have been much better at providing me with what I need.

  18. Boz Bundalo

    Putting Steve Jobs and open web and open source in the same article is blasphemy. I don’t know how you can connect the two and be serious. He was the embodiment of everything you are afraid of. Proprietary platforms driven by locking users in so they cannot leave and have to keep buying things for him under the excuse of “experience”.

    And the reason why others will try to think about what would Steve do is because everyone saw that locked down, proprietary approach is making A TON of money. He single-handedly contributed and instigated what you are afraid of.

    • Steve Jobs was successful in many ways. There are lessons that can be learnt from what he did, and those lessons can be applied to any technology, be it open source.

      And user experience is not an excuse. Its the reason people buy things. Try making stuff without it, and see if you are able to sell a single piece of it.

    • panjwani_ajay

      apple being closed does not mean that one cannot browse certain sites. think of apple as a company that charges double ( consumers hate that) but delivers half tco (businesses love that). and it is able to pull that off only by keeping certain things closed.

      • Vincent Amari

        May be so, but 2 weeks into my new Android phone and I’m still struggling to export MY sms text messages from MY iPhone. Even Apple support doesn’t respond to my requests for help with this. I think they forget I was a customer for many years, and if this was easily resolved I could become a customer again!