This week’s talk about usage-based billing, spurred by the growing adoption of streaming services like Netflix (s NFLX) and their impact on ISPs, has been a bit of a deja vu for BitTorrent CEO Eric Klinker. BitTorrent Inc. was at the center of the last big hubbub about clogged pipes back in 2007, when Comcast (s cmcsa) was caught throttling its customers’ P2P transfers. And just like back then, Klinker thinks the solution to ISPs’ current woes isn’t to charge or slow down customers. Instead, he believes smart technology can solve our problems and save the Internet in the process.
Klinker’s optimism isn’t just based on wishful thinking. BitTorrent file sharing is still responsible for 16.5 percent of all residential fixed-line data traffic in the U.S., according to recent Sandvine data. That makes the P2P protocol the second largest data service after Netflix, and twice as big as YouTube (s goog). But no one is really talking about BitTorrent clogging up the pipes anymore, and Klinker believes that has a lot to do with some tweaks the company made to its file transfer algorithms.
The history of µTP
BitTorrent Inc. started its work on traffic optimization back in 2006, when it acquired a small company called Plicto. The startup that had been founded by engineers who had previously worked on the Internet2 infrastructure, which is the next-generation, high-speed data network that connects universities and other research facilities. Plicto had figured out a way to optimize file transfers in a way that wouldn’t negatively impact the overall performance of the network, and BitTorrent thought this was a great asset to sell P2P to corporate clients.
BitTorrent’s business plan at the time was to help media companies with the distribution of large video files, and the thought was that a TV network would never buy into a solution that would impact people’s VoIP calls, or bring their web browsing down to a crawl. BitTorrent rebranded the technology as µTP to match the branding of its flagship µTorrent client and began to deploy it as part of its P2P-CDN to enterprise clients.
However, it quickly became apparent there was little money to be made with undercutting CDNs. The company scaled back its B2B offerings and instead began to incorporate µTP into its consumer file-sharing software, where it is now used by more than 100 million clients in the market.
At the same time, it began to pitch the solution to potential partners and standards bodies, and in 2010, BitTorrent finally open-sourced µTP. The technology has since been adopted by all the major vendors of BitTorrent-based file sharing software, including Vuze and Transmission. Klinker estimates that today, 80 to 90 percent of all torrent traffic is µTP-based. This would mean up to 15 percent of all residential U.S. traffic is now congestion-aware: an astonishing number.
Why BitTorrent loves declining numbers
So what kind of practical impact has µTP had on ISPs and their network congestion issues? Klinker believes the proof is in the numbers. Sandvine’s data has widely been seen as proof that file sharing overall is receding. However, the folks at BitTorrent were ready to open the champagne when the network management company released its most report. The reason: Sandvine concentrates on peak bandwidth, and BitTorrent is now only responsible for 7.62 percent of all residential peak download bandwidth. “That’s a good indicator that it’s working,” Klinker told me, explaining that µTPs biggest goal was to steer clear of times when bandwidth usage peaks.
BitTorrent Inc. is now looking to make µTP more popular, both with ISPs and other companies that could use congestion-aware data transfers. There’s some interest in the IT world, and the company is working together with heavyweights like Microsoft (s MSFT) to turn µTP into an officially recognized standard through the IETF. Klinker believes cloud backup services, companies that have to distribute big software updates and possibly even VOD vendors that don’t depend on real-time data transfers could all benefit from µTP.
How about congestion-based billing?
But on the ISP front, Klinker still has to fight some misconceptions. “It’s astounding how few of them understand how their business works,” he told me. The latest example is the recent debate around usage-based billing. Klinker doesn’t believe it would do anything to alleviate network congestion, and he wishes ISPs would be a little more innovative. One idea he floated to me was to make apps aware of caps. If BitTorrent could query a user’s data quota, then it could help users to avoid going over their caps, and eventually, ISPs could reward users for utilizing apps that are aware of network congestion and help to avoid bandwidth spikes. “You should really do congestion-based billing,” he suggested.