Blog Post

Why Google Needs +1 and Identity to Work Together

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

The pressure is on for Google to develop a social strategy. With +1 Google is making a smart move by using its current power in search to try to gain traction in social. But Google can and should leverage the combination of +1 and its users’ Google identities. Google is still behind when it comes to the social graph, but with the concept of identity, Google starts from a much stronger position.

Publishers will love +1, but what about people? When Google makes available the “+1” buttons for publishers, there will be significant incentive for publishers to add the buttons since it will add critical SEO value to the URL. Google may use this data to rank results, but even if it doesn’t, users will be influenced by the number of +1’s displayed in search results when they decide what to click. I believe that unlike the failed “buzz” button, which never got traction with publishers, the +1 button could be very attractive.

Thus, the hurdle for +1 lies not with publishers but with consumers. To be successful, Google needs people to click +1, but that’s a harder task than it may expect. Consider the Facebook “Like” button. People click “Like” not because they want to contribute to an object or company’s ranking, but because they want to show off their association. “Liking” something broadcasts an association with content or products to your feed and therefore your friends. So with no opportunity to show off, Google may get no clicks. But there is a way for Google to help achieve a critical mass of +1 data that doesn’t require a user actually clicking +1.

Here’s how: Social Sign On – an identity play. When a user authenticates with a site by using their Google credentials, giving permission to that site to access their profile information and social graph, that act is a “+1 equivalent action”, and should be treated as such by Google. And Google can build this into the social sign-on process explicitly; I’ve illustrated one option in the graphic to the right.

Identity as the Foothold for Google’s Social Play

Increasingly, sites are enabling users to sign-in with their existing identity on social networks or other providers. Look at the Huffington Post and other publishers like Fox News, CBS and ABC. It’s clear that users prefer to sign-in using an established online identity rather than create a new one on each site they visit. Passwords are dead.
Currently, no identity provider is as popular as Facebook among B2C websites. More than 1M sites enable Facebook for sign-in. The reason Facebook is so popular among websites (as compared with OpenID or other solutions), is that there is real value for the website associated with that Facebook sign-in.

Whenever users sign-in to a site with their Facebook identity, Facebook provides the site with rich user profile data. This type of connection also enables frictionless sharing, which results in more traffic to the site. Yes, Google provides APIs for sign-in, but currently they do not provide enough value — data or otherwise — for websites. As a result, there is insufficient adoption across websites of Google Social Sign-on. With the wide Facebook Connect adoption by websites, people began to use their Facebook identity across the Internet far more often than their Google identity.

So Google needs a killer value proposition for sites to drive adoption of sign-in with Google. To provide one, it needs to continue to leverage its most sacred asset – search. When a user signs-in to a website with Google, over some number of days, Google should give higher weight to results coming from that site for that specific user. It makes sense that if I read articles at, that site’s results will appear in my news searches above other news sources. Because Search is such a critical source of traffic channel for most websites, sites would implement Google sign-in tomorrow if it meant that their page rank would increase for users who use Google to sign-in into their site.

This could also be the first olive branch from Google Search to websites. For too long SEO has been a black hole for sites that never know when changes in algorithms could adversely affect them. It would be good for Google’s relationship with sites to collaborate with them, giving them a white-hat way to improve search result relevance.

What’s in it for Google? Being one of the leading identity providers gives Google permission-based access to user data that will enrich any service it offers – from search to commerce to social. Google is the leading search engine, but how loyal are its users? Identity can equate to commitment. Having a strong play in identity is Google’s key to building a long-term relationship with its users while increasing the value of Google services to websites Pleasing both parties will put Google well on its way to creating a defensible position in social.

Rooly Eliezerov is co-founder and product strategist at Gigya, a SaaS company providing technologies that make websites social.

11 Responses to “Why Google Needs +1 and Identity to Work Together”

  1. Nadav

    Good points made in the article.
    I think this has major potential for Google in the long term – possibly a way to properly get their foot in the door of social and user engagement.

  2. RogerDodger

    I don’t want to sign into my search engine, that is why I refuse to use Gmail. While a common identity is convenient, it is a terrible security strategy. Best of breed disparate systems is the best approach for users if they really think about it.

  3. They have really been tightening up the accounts in the last couple of weeks and making small subtle changes for this. If you use Google apps for your domain you’ll notice logging in to personal Gmail accounts at same time now conflicts it! +1 will be a dream for publishers but it is also completely open to abuse and manipulation from an SEO perspective. The like button to a certain extent doesn’t carry as much weight but if a +1 means you go up the search rankings that is an interesting move.

  4. That’s an interesting point about tweets versus likes. There are way more Facebook users than Twitter users, and yet on this page there are ten times as many tweets. I also feel like one of the reasons I don’t facebook like things very often is that I don’t want to participate in Facebook spamming.

  5. The number of people who click like in facebook is extremely low, one of the reasons being you spam all the people you ever knew with this fact.

    Given controls who gets notified, way more people would like / +1 pages. Just for example, compare your analytics numbers with likes on gigaom, this page has only 10 likes and 200 tweets.