Blog Post

Chrome OS vs. Jolicloud: Similar on the Surface

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

The Google (s goog) announcement today put the upcoming Chrome OS in the spotlight as an OS based entirely on the Chrome web browser, aimed at replacing legacy desktop systems from Microsoft (s msft) and Apple (s aapl). Systems with Chrome OS will not hit the market until mid-2011 according to Google, but web-centric Jolicloud is currently available for those who want to see what the fuss is about. It has a lot more in common with Chrome OS than you might think.


Both Jolicloud and Chrome OS have a Linux kernel for interacting with the hardware. Chrome OS uses the Chrome browser as the user interface and all activities take place within the browser. Jolicloud uses Chromium as the interface, which is the open-source version of Chrome OS produced by Google. All user activity takes place within this Chromium interface, just like Chrome OS.

Both platforms are designed to be used on netbook class systems. They are designed to be good performers on less-powerful hardware, which works well, as they use the browser as the engine to make things happen. Instead of heavy legacy applications, they both use web apps constructed with HTML5, CSS and JavaScript designed to work within the browser environment.


While Chrome OS and Jolicloud are similar in nature, they have some big differences. Jolicloud is developed by a small company for end-user installation, and is thus designed to work on existing hardware. This limits what can be done by the developers of Jolicloud, as they must deal with constraints put on them by the hardware. Google has the clout to work with hardware makers, and has designed some aspects of Chrome OS for new hardware to make it work as desired. OEMs have responded to Google’s needs, giving Chrome OS systems an advantage over standard systems with Jolicloud installed.

A big advantage that Chrome OS has over Jolicloud is the Chrome Web Store. Google is working with major developers to produce web apps for Chrome OS, and Jolicloud can’t duplicate that effort. The Chrome Web Store is already open for business, though the OS isn’t commercially available yet. The sneak peek that Google has provided of early apps makes it clear there will be solid apps available. While these apps may run under Jolicloud — they are web apps after all — it’s not a given.

Test Drive

Those wondering what all the fuss is about web-centric OSes can take Jolicloud for a test drive to see first-hand. It can be run totally online on any system with the Google Chrome browser.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub. req.):

4 Responses to “Chrome OS vs. Jolicloud: Similar on the Surface”

  1. another important difference: Jolicloud can run Linux apps natively and most Windows apps in a WINE compatibility layer. You can get a full office sweet, photo editors, media players net-telephony, games, programing utilities, VPN services, file sync; not to mention complete control over every aspect of your system through a GNU/Linux shell terminal… Jolicloud is a full-featured operating system that can provide a complete application suite offline.

    It happens to do this in a fast, light Linux and HTML5 environment, similar to Chrome, but the differences are substantial.

  2. Jolicloud is based on Ubuntu, though, so the mentioned lack of app support really doesn’t exist on Jolicloud, while Google’s Chrome OS is, at least for now, restricted to web-based apps.

    Chrome OS seems very unimpressively like a fullscreen browser, while projects like Jolicloud have some additional potential due to the addition of native apps. Now where Google will go with it’s whole native code in the browser thing will be interesting to watch.