Blog Post

iPad 2: A Clearer Picture of What to Expect

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

New rumors are circulating that the next iPad (s aapl) will have front- and back-facing cameras, and FaceTime. We looked at what you might expect from the iPad 2 back in August, but in the intervening months, much has come to light that paints a different picture.

With more competitors entering the fray, Apple will have to really impress to maintain its commanding lead when it does introduce a new model. The next iPad will deliver more of what users want, and it’ll pick up a few tricks from its nearest Mac relative, the MacBook Air.

All-in on FaceTime

Apple will bring front and back cameras to the iPad. Even if the reports about OmniVision’s contract for image sensors for both a 5-megapixel rear and VGA front-facing camera hadn’t surfaced, I’d be sure of this. The cameras are a definite upgrade incentive for first-gen iPad owners, but they also expand the reach of FaceTime and bolster Apple’s mobile video standing.

Many will object that the rear-facing camera isn’t as much of a certainty, especially if Apple just wants people to use video calling, but I think we’ll see it. It’ll draw in users who don’t already have an iPhone or iPod touch for mobile video, and besides, the ability to switch between views is something Apple really pushed in its FaceTime-based iPhone marketing campaigns. It’s a key differentiator, and Apple wants users to have it on all mobile platforms.

More Ports

If there’s one thing Apple hates, it’s slots, knobs and buttons marring the edges of its machines. Still, some are predicting more of those for the next iPad. Goldman Sachs analysts say the iPad 2 will get mini-USB, and Mission:Repair says the iPad will have two dock connectors so it can be docked in either portrait or landscape mode.

The mini-USB thing just isn’t going to happen. Apple has too much invested in the dock connector for now, and I think if they ever do replace it, it’ll be with a micro-dock connector or some other proprietary tech. I do think two 30-pin ports makes sense. From a UX perspective, the lack of a second dock connector is probably the thing I find most frustrating about the iPad. It’s a minor annoyance, but it annoys so frequently that I can see Apple addressing it.

New Case

The case will get an update, though it probably won’t be a dramatic one, like what we saw with the iPhone 4. Instead, look to the example of the iPod touch and the MacBook Air, arguably the iPad’s spiritual “parents,” for what’s coming next for the physical design of the iPad.

We’ll see a slimmer and lighter iPad, made possible by new tech introduced in the MacBook Air, including a low-profile camera unit and better battery tech. The aluminum back will stay, unless Apple’s patent for nitride coatings for stainless steel has already borne fruit, since that would allow better communication from the iPad’s various antennas.

More Power

The A4 powering will remain, but it’ll get a speed bump. We’ll probably see a 1.5GHz version, and we’ll definitely get at least 512MB of RAM to bring the iPad up to par with the iPhone 4. I’m thinking speed and performance will be what Apple focuses on to distance itself from BlackBerry (s rimm) and other competitors, since it has a head start in this arena with its own low-power mobile processor design.

The Best Mobile Screen Available

Another focus, and one that Apple will sell much more heavily to consumers, will be the quality of the display. Apple showed with the iPod touch that it was committed to bringing Retina Display technology to devices beyond the iPhone, and it won’t stop there.

Analysts are predicting a Retina Display in the iPad 2, and I agree. By the time the next version is ready for production, costs on the tech should’ve come down considerably thanks to lessons learned with the iPhone 4 and iPod touch, and I bet even with the size increase, there won’t be a problem with margins. Apple’s introduction of higher res screens in the MacBook Air is a good indication of where its priorities lie.

More Storage

Another inheritance the MacBook Air will pass on to the iPad 2 is greater storage capacity. As Apple boosts mobile storage to further its efforts with Apple TV and AirPlay, and as flash prices continue to drop, 128GB will be an option with the next lineup. More storage will also be important as more and more people opt to take their video files with them on the go.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

26 Responses to “iPad 2: A Clearer Picture of What to Expect”

  1. bettaboy123

    personally i think both cams. it may sound stupid, but the best camera is the one you have with you. lighter and thinner are a given, same with more battery life and the gyroscope. better screen resolution, but not retina (or even close). faster, maybe even dual-core processor. maybe increased storage and maybe multiple 3G service providers on one model.

  2. max moran

    When will apple come out with an ipad with OS capabilities so that the ipad will have a built in downloader? I think that in a couple of years they will do this, basically making the Ipad a handheld touch screen mac computer.

  3. I believe that apple would include a usb port before putting in two connector ports (which wouldn’t make any sense because portrait does work even when connected). I also think that they will only include a screen side camera. Why have a rear facing camera?

    It should be thinner, longer battery life, faster processor, have a USB port, and a screen side camera.

  4. Apple Genius

    Why would we put TWO dock connectors into any of our products?
    If we did that, the design element would be thrown out the window. You only need one to connect to iTunes.

    Why would we suddenly introduce mini-USB to replace the 30-pin dock connector? We are pretty happy with it as it stands.

    Even though I just stated the above two, I would like to also state as an end-note:
    Not even us Apple Genius’ know what they bring until Apple present it. We’re only retail after all.

  5. Blackjackers

    The greatest improvement that I would like to see is for the iPad to have some sort of attachment which would allow me to quickly tie a string to it. I currently use my iPad as a boat anchor and it is somewhat difficult to attach the string to the device. If a circular extension was provided, my job would be much easier. My line of work is also very dangerous as I have to swing the iPad above my head before I cast it into the sea.(The iPad has to reach a minimum safe distance from the ship) It would be nice if Apple could provide me with a soft casing so if by some random fluke I end up swinging the iPad into my skull, the damage will be minimal. Apple could also provide me with a discount on baseball helmets, seeing as I don’t purchase any applications, it would be nice to see Apple go out of their way to help a customer.

  6. There’s just one other bit of iPhone 4 tech that I expect to be incorporated into the iPad 2.0, the gyroscope. A small, but important sensor to improve the iPad’s gesture and positional-based controls, particularly suited for gaming, but certainly useful for other things as well.

  7. I’d like to see a higher resolution screen but it seems very difficult. This is not like increasing the resolution of a laptop screen. The iPad apps are designed to work at the current resolution. That is why on the iPhone they could quadruple the number of pixels. Doubling the x and y resolution made it easy to change the apps.

    Perhaps they’ll find a way around this and we’ll see an intermediate increase in resolution. More likely this will have to wait for 2012. Anyway, likely the screen quality will increase with the same number of pixels.

  8. Rear-facing camera doesn’t make sense at all. Don’t expect to see that. Most of the point here are a little predictable, but not all that likely. Retina would be kind of impossible on a screen that size.
    But what about a gyro-meter? Seems a lot more likely to me they would include that in iPad 2.

  9. Christopher Hewitt

    The back camera

    Fornpeople saying would be stupid taking pics with 10″
    yes that would be stupid but The back camera would be more use for applications such as augmented reality applications

  10. A front and rear camera is a given without question it would be madness not to include them. The benefits far outweigh not including them and the iPad become so much more practical. Ok, a camera on the back does seem odd but it can actually serve a very good purpose.

    Mini USB, nice idea, if anything it may have a SD card slot but I tend to agree, if they put mini USB, then that devours the need for people to buy larger space on more expensive models.

    A retina display is would naturally be the icing but I think its too early and too expensive for the iPad just yet, that may be generation 3, although, I really, really hope I am wrong.

    It goes without question that millions of existing iPad owners such as myself is hanging for this particular with FaceTime. The minute that is included, I’m going out and buying a few for the in-laws overseas. It can’t come soon enough.

    Shine early next year.

  11. I think the back camera is a useless idea. It seems like a feature that others added just to say they had it. There’s not any benefit to having a ten-inch camera.

    I could see them adding a built-in SD card slot, but other than that, I don’t think it’s gonna happen.

    I’m not sure about the Retina Display. I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t see them adding a 2048×1536 display while maintaining the low price, great battery life and performance. In a two or three years, maybe. In 2011, probably not.

    And more power, God I hope so.

  12. I’d guess, to start– thinner, lighter, and longer battery life. In terms of volume and weight, a lot of Apple’s products are turning into, basically, batteries with a display and a logic board. I expect the iPad to follow this trend.

    I also expect the WiFi-only iPad to get cheaper, rather than to get more features– although a second camera is likely. Finally, I think there will be a super-iPad with one two USB ports. But… we shall see…

  13. I don’t buy the rear facing camera. No one is going to use an iPad as a photo taking camera, so why include it. Apple put in only what’s necessary, no more no less.

    And I don’t see a retina display for the next gen. Eric is right, it would be prohibitively expensive.

    My pic would be 2 megapixel front facing camera, CPU speed bump, more memory, and maybe refinement of the case. Front facing camera alone will provide enough incentive for gen 1 owners to upgrade.

  14. Retina display will not happen. Simply too much screen real-estate. Maybe a better resolution like 1.2x more, but we will not get Retina display that’s for sure, because with the pixel density of the iPhone the iPad would have like 2400×1800 res. Too bad, would love to see it happen though, but it’s just not reasonable.

  15. Producing a “Retina Display” (i.e. somewhere in the 300 dpi range) on a 9.7″ display would be exponentially more expensive and technically challenging that it is on 3.5″ devices. Not gonna happen.

  16. johngrant75

    Since purchasing and using Apple TV and AirVideo, i genuinely believe that greater storage capacity is less of an issue now due to improved streaming capabilities.

    My iMac is now the media hub that my phone, ipad and tv all now stream from. It just works!