4G Plan Update: Who's Doing What With Mobile Broadband Through 2013

20 Comments

Between the efforts of the four major U.S. cellular carriers and Clearwire, mobile broadband in this country is undergoing a fundamental change. And while the pace of that change isn’t fast enough for some, we’re better off than we were at this time in 2005. Back then, Sprint was first lighting up EVDO in San Francisco, T-Mobile was still betting on Wi-Fi, Verizon’s EVDO rollout was half-done and AT&T (then known as Cingular) was just getting ready to start the 3G train rolling. Clearwire, meanwhile, was still just a baby; it turned two in October of that year.

So for wireless junkies, the past half-decade has indeed been a treat to watch, but with so much change underway, now is a good time to once again take stock of what’s on the horizon. One thing we can all but count on is for the next three years to bring more change than the last five did.

AT&T (s t): The second-largest carrier currently offers HSPA speeds of 3.6 Mbps down nationwide, but began upgrading software at its cellular towers this past January for a 7.2 Mbps rollout this year. After that, AT&T could cheaply re-double speeds with HSPA+ technology as it waits to see if device makers and consumers are ready for LTE. The carrier is currently poised to begin a 4G rollout with LTE in 2011, which should boost speeds to the 5-12 Mbps range. John Stankey, president and CEO of AT&T Operations, recently told GigaOM that he doesn’t expect a large variety of LTE handsets — and the VoIP services to go along with them — to become available until 2014.

Verizon Wireless (s vz): The No. 1 carrier that led the EVDO revolution is also leading the LTE charge. Verizon expects to cover 100 million people with LTE before 2010 is out and to have its current 3G footprint blanketed with 4G by the close of 2013, taking download speeds to the 5-12 Mbps from today’s 1.4 Mbps. Look for phones that support LTE on Verizon by this time next year, although such handsets will only use 4G for data, according to Verizon CTO Dick Lynch.

Clearwire (s clwr): Currently offering WiMAX in some three dozen cities, Clearwire advertises average mobile speeds of 3-6 Mbps. By the end of 2010, it expects to cover 120 million people, including those in most major cities, with 4G access. Details for 2011 and beyond are sketchy, but the company recently left open the slim possibility of transitioning to LTE from WiMAX technology at some point in the future. I’d expect Clearwire to still be using WiMAX for the next several years, however, as it tries to recoup its expenditures from the WiMAX buildout.

Sprint (s s): With its EVDO rollout now complete, Sprint is looking ahead but in a different direction than AT&T and Verizon. Instead of LTE, Sprint has partnered with Clearwire (in which it owns a majority stake) to use 4G WiMAX. Currently covering 43 million potential customers, Sprint aims to boost that number to 120 million before the end of 2010. Sprint’s future is closely tied to that of Clearwire, so it should still be offering WiMAX through 2013, although it’s also likely the carrier begins to move some voice services to the 4G data network by then.

T-Mobile: The smallest major carrier was also the last to roll out 3G, but like the race between the tortoise and the hare, T-Mobile already offers some of the fastest 3.5G mobile broadband in the country. T-Mobile started a 3G rollout in September 2008, but is using 2010 to upgrade to HSPA+ capable of around 10 Mbps download speeds. More than 75 million people have access to this network and all of T-Mobile’s coverage area — around 185 million — will see it by end of year. Future plans don’t include WiMAX or LTE, since with the right infrastructure and software upgrades, HSPA+ can be expanded up to 84 Mbps with real-world speeds of roughly half that.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

4G: State of the Union

20 Comments

Octavio

This is a wonderful insight to the world of US mobile carriers indeed. It may not have all the details for some techno-junkies but it does paint a summary. After reaading several articles on this subject the balance of power will change within the the 4 major carriers within the US. I’m very impressed with T-Mobile HSPA+ for it can provide high speed access with stability and cost effectiveness (AKA. You wont see your skyrocking to fast because of cost). Right now T-Mobile HSPA+ has the fastest speed in mobile web browsing within the US.
Sprint is using Wimax for their 4G services, and believe me wimax is good but it will take Sprint between 5 to 10 years to fully provide a nationwide wimax network (this a ball-park estimate). Sprint is starting from scratch and I give it a few years the wimax network will be a major competitor. I learned about wimax through a russian company called Yota and they provide service in Moscow and St. Petersburg is growing network.
At&t flashy phones and high price service but no substance. The GoPhone is their only saving grace. LTE network is their flagship good luck on placing your bets on technology that no one truly knows the specs except that they heard of it.
Verizon the cadillac of the phone carriers with high invoice bills along with lack luster service. I had their service and my reception was terrible considering I lived within a 2 miles radius of 2 towers and thats when I made my switch to AT&t.
Disclaimer: I’m a new subscriber to T-mobile its my 1st time but I did research the company HSPA+ network before I signed my life to them for 2 years.
kevin keep up the good work and keep providing us with more intel ok.

Ray

Only half the picture is presented here. Sprint has recently announce, and strangely the announcement has been ignored by GigaOM, that Sprint is going to start enforcing caps on data “hogs,” though not on mobile phones like the EVO just yet.

Does it really make sense anymore to talk about speed without the context of how much a customer can actually download without hitting a cap or other penalties? We know at least we’re going to be charged more for these faster technologies, whether we need them or not. How about a least some insight as to where the price of a byte is going?

Kevin C. Tofel

Fair thoughts, Ray, but this post was intended more as a summary picture to build on. However, you’re absolutely correct that caps, penalties and tiered pricing are relevant to the conversation. We’ve had a number of posts on those topics of late. As far as Sprint (or anyone else for that matter) capping data hogs, that’s a trend that isn’t new, although carriers are taking different approaches. T-Mobile, for example, isn’t capping, but may throttle speeds after 5 GB of usage.

Long story short: we’re watching these developments as the fixed constraints of mobile broadband supply challenge growing consumer demand.

jojo

Sprint’s cap is only for 3G data cards, not 4G or phones. The other carriers have far stricter caps coming. Verizon will be charging 4G data by the bucket, no unlimited. ATT has gone to 2GB limit. Tmobile reduces performance after 5GB. Sprint is actually the least strict and 4G is completely 100% unlimited and probably will be for longer than others. If Clear does put caps on 4G, it will likely be comparable to the cable industry, not telcom industry.

Ramon B. Nuez Jr.

Kevin this is simply a great post — that highlights what the U.S. mobile operators are doing today and for the future.

I would have liked to see some additional clarification on the marketing use or mis-use of 4G. It is my understanding that to date the ITU has not ratified a 4G standard. Additionally, all air interfaces including LTE are only pre-4G. The only air interface that is considered 4G is LTE Advanced?

Kevin C. Tofel

Ramon, my thought is that current use of 4G in the U.S. is more of a marketing or branding term than a technical one right now for the reasons you mentioned.

Comments are closed.