Blog Post

What the Web Is Saying About the Apple iPad

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

Although the iPad’s true potential will come from the media and software applications that will inevitably be created for it, first impressions of the device itself are just as important. Consumers want to know how easy is to use the iPad’s finger-friendly interface for browsing, navigating and data entry. What scenarios might be better suited for the iPad vs. a netbook?

These questions are often answered first by the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times and USA Today, but Apple provided early iPads to more outlets. Perhaps that fact alone says more to the widespread device appeal than any review could tell you. With more reviews available prior to the iPad launch, you have more information to decide if the iPad fits in your lifestyle, so we’re sharing key excerpts to help guide you down the path.

BoingBoing identifies a synergy that belie the specifications alone:

“The display is large enough to make the experience of apps and games on smaller screens stale. Typography is crisp, images gem-like, and the speed brisk thanks to Apple’s A4 chip and solid state storage. As I browse early release iPad apps, web pages, and flip through the iBook store and books, the thought hits that this is a greater leap into a new user experience than the sum of its parts suggests.”

Addressing a key concern shared by many, tackles the data entry question:

“As someone who’s all thumbs when it comes to iPhone’s tiny on-screen keyboard, I wondered if the iPad’s larger keyboard would help me master this touch screen typing thing. In a word: Yes. I’m writing this review on the iPad’s horizontal keyboard, in which the keys are large and nicely spaced. (The vertical keyboard is a little tighter, but still definitely useable.) If it weren’t comfortable, I would have abandoned the iPad for my laptop 1,000 words ago.”

David Pogue of the New York Times says this to techies:

“The bottom line is that you can get a laptop for much less money — with a full keyboard, DVD drive, U.S.B. jacks, camera-card slot, camera, the works. Besides: If you’ve already got a laptop and a smartphone, who’s going to carry around a third machine?”

Pogue also reviews the iPad for the non-tech crowd:

“The iPad is so fast and light, the multitouch screen so bright and responsive, the software so easy to navigate, that it really does qualify as a new category of gadget. Some have suggested that it might make a good goof-proof computer for technophobes, the aged and the young; they’re absolutely right.”

The Houston Chronicle’s Bob “Dr. Mac” LeVitus concludes:

“It turns out the iPad isn’t as much a laptop replacement as I thought (though it could easily be used as one). Instead, it’s an entirely new category of mobile device. For example, now when I want to surf the Web from the couch or back deck, the iPad is the device I choose. Starbucks? Same thing. Think of the iPad as a new arrow in your technology quiver, an arrow that will often be the best tool for a given task.”

And finally, Andy Ihnatko of the Chicago Sun-Times tackles the iPad vs. netbook question:

“It’s bad news for the netbook when you judge the iPad on its own terms. Or anybody else’s, come to think of it. The design of a netbook is about nonstop, relentless, and soul-shredding compromises. A netbook’s engineers have only one real goal: make a PC that’s really small, and make it cheap enough to produce that it won’t cost more than $350 or better yet, $250.”

Steven Fry’s review at Time is unique, and underscores much of what he said in January. At the iPad launch, he saw the form begets function potential:

“There are many issues you could have with the iPad. No multitasking, still no Flash. No camera, no GPS. They all fall away the minute you use it. I cannot emphasise enough this point: Hold your judgment until you’ve spent five minutes with it.”

After viewing reader comments from all the reviews, I’m convinced of three things. Those that were planning to buy an iPad are still doing so, while many of those that were on the fence are now more interested in the device. I have yet to see any comments with regrets of pre-order or future purchase plans, so prepare yourself: the Age of iPad is upon us.

12 Responses to “What the Web Is Saying About the Apple iPad”

  1. Michael

    I own both a MacBook Pro and a MacBook Air (MBA). I’m getting the 3G iPad to replace my MBA. I’m an attorney who bought the MBA for a lightweight computer to use when on I’m on the road, at depositions or sitting at home in front of the TV surfing the web and doing email. Since the iPad will run IWork and FileMaker’s Bento, I plan to give my MBA to my daughter and use the IPad for my travel and family room device. When hooked to MobileMe’s iDisk, I should have all of my files at my fingertips (no pun intended) wherever I am and whenever I need them.

  2. brian chang

    I am going to use it for business and private. Have preordered two and possibly will be having 10 ipad in our extend family by year end. brian

  3. Paul Calento

    Many of the reviews remind me of how computers were reviewed circa the 90’s. Device specs are only part of the story. Apple seems to be carving out new markets here. While the iPad is clearly positioned as a consumer device, recent surveys indicate desired business use ( … which will lead to more market inertia. About Me –

  4. Everybody who says the iPad can’t do this and can’t do that, therefore they don’t want one, doesn’t know what they’re talking about until they try out an iPad. Only then will they know!

    • Steven

      Does your netbook have a touchscreen coupled with an OS and apps designed to use it?


      Then it doesn’t really compete for the same audience now does it!

      • timjones17

        The iPad is half-baked. So many missing features, it’s pretty clear what this iPad can’t do. See what other- more capable and versatile touch Android, even Windows 7, mobile devices that comes out, can do. But not this half-baked iPad.

    • I have a few netbooks so I can’t argue with the “netbook does more” view. I’ve also been using Tablet PCs since 2004 and could apply the same argument — especially when it comes to handwriting recognition.

      But I’m looking beyond specs and missing features. My approach: don’t look at what the product can’t do, but look at what it can do. Given the bottom-up approach as a touch UI — as opposed to Microsoft’s top-down attempt to turn a mouse/keyboard driven UI into a touch experience — I anticipate the iPad will be very good at what it can do.

      Folks that need different features should stick with what works — I’d never argue otherwise.