Blippy's Philip Kaplan on the Last Frontier of Private Info

20 Comments

Is nothing sacred anymore? Is privacy just an outdated construct in light of new ways to harness personal information? That’s what it seems like these days. Blippy, a new startup incubated by Charles River Ventures, is trying to push the private/public boundary another step further, by allowing users to share online their purchase history down to the specific item.

We spoke today with Philip Kaplan, the F***ed Company and AdBrite founder who co-founded Blippy. Today Blippy shows purchase data from Amazon, iTunes, GoDaddy and others; coming soon are Fandango, PayPal, Crate & Barrel and Etsy. As compared to a finance management site like Mint, where users upload transaction information as a personal effort to better monitor their money, Blippy creates a social experience right down to each item you bought, each app you downloaded and which movie you’re planning to see. It’s kind of insane — and really, something worth trying on for size yourself to see if it floats your boat or raises your hackles. If you’re quick, 150 of you can register for Blippy with the invite code gigaom123.

Below is a condensed version of an interview with Kaplan from earlier today.

Liz Gannes: To me, this almost seems an art experiment in pushing forward what information can be social.

Philip Kaplan: There is definitely a hump that people need to get over to the point that people get comfortable sharing this information, but then you wonder why we all have this feeling that this should be private. I guess our parents told us not to share this? Nobody really knows why.

I don’t want to come across like I think everybody who’s concerned about this is silly, because I was super concerned about this. But now I’ve relaxed about a lot of this stuff. It’s more interesting when you do. I’ve spent $160 on a Wi-Fi scale on Amazon, and now four people that I know of have bought it since they saw it on Blippy.

Liz: As with other early social services, my first connections on Blippy are with people I know only loosely through the tech industry. So it’s hard to know how I’d feel about the service if I was using it with closer friends.

Kaplan: Personally I think there’s a lot of value in sharing with strangers. I probably follow 400 people on Twitter, and I know probably 50 of them personally.

Some people are using Blippy and they’re not making their purchases public at all. They’re just using it as a simple consolidation of their purchases, like Mint.com but one step further. Our goal would be — you know that receipt you get from the grocery store and you throw away, that’s amazing data. We want to show not just where you’re spending but where you’re buying.

Liz: It seems pretty daring that you made the default to share everything publicly, given you’re already encouraging people to share information they’ve never shared before.

Kaplan: You can use the site anonymously, publicly, use your real name or not. Mine is public and that’s where I find the most value. My theory will be that people use the site for a while and then open up.

Liz: As people get started on the service, what Blippy users would you recommend following who make interesting purchases?

Kaplan: Cat, Matt [Cutts, from Google], Shellen [Jason, from Brizzly], Noah Kagan. And, of course, the Blippy founders, me, Ashvin Kumar, Chris Estreich.

Liz: The site was a little sluggish for me today; will you be able to handle the load of additional users?

Kaplan: We just added three servers about 15 minutes ago, so it should be better now.

20 Comments

Mark

@Ryan… I dont think its about privacy concerns and being on or off the grid, to be honest. I think those arguments are deliberate red herrings.

Its really about all of us being used to make other people rich. I mean how many Google’s do we want? Who “monetize” us so they can buy private jets.

I’m surprised it isn’t troubling to more people. So I join this service. I expose ALL of my data because, you know, Phil says I’m a luddite if I dont. And what do I get in return? I can see when he buys a Ferrari F430 with the money he made selling my personal info to marketeers so they can target me with their BS? And what do I get exactly?

I hear pundits like Jeff Jarvis say that the “benefit” I get is more meaningful and effective targeting and I get to participate in this great new society and, in addition, I get some free baubles of questionable usefulness. I mean Google at least gives you some useful tools in exchange for the enormous money they make off of you. But Facebook, or Twitter, or now this? What do we get really that we couldnt have had 1000 other ways?

When do the “monetized sheep” get a piece of the pie?

Want to impress me “blippy”? Well then how about when you expose my grocery purchasing trends, and Kraft pays you $1 so they can send me crap or “target” me with some Google fueled ad (if this isnt here today, REST ASURED it is on their business plan), how about I get cut in for a few pennies? What? Too much to ask? Yeah, I figured.

Ryan

At first I wasn’t psyched about this idea, but the more I think about it, the more I like it.

Transparency is the future… embrace it or get off the grid.

Mike Warner

The reason people dont want to share this information is because they never want to be the one publicly embarrassed that they spent to much.

jenkins

never know what will happen with an idea like this but I’d say that the odds are low.

Addam

This has got to be one of the worst ideas in a sea of bad ideas.

We need less information not more, not that Pud gives a crap but who the hell is interested in this type of transparency in their lives?

Comments are closed.