Blog Post

VC Funding Heading Back to Pre-Bubble Levels

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

nullVenture firms were still shy about making investments in startups during the second quarter of 2009, and the industry as a whole will likely return to 1996 funding levels, with VCs investing between $11 billion and $14 billion for the year, according to the MoneyTree Report from PricewaterhouseCoopers and the National Venture Capital Association. Venture capitalists put $3.7 billion in 612 deals in the second quarter of 2009, a 42 percent drop in deals from the same period last year, and a 51 percent decrease in dollars, based on data provided by Thomson Reuters.


The decrease in fundings during the first half of the year are a sign of a dismal exit environment and the economic malaise, and may also represent a permanent shrinking of the industry that several experts have called for in the last nine months. Judging by the types of companies still receiving money, the downshift in investment seems to have caused the cleantech industry to see the largest fall, while investments in the web and information technology stayed a little more steady. Perhaps venture firms are retreating to the types of investments they know.


Photo by bigmick via Flickr.

12 Responses to “VC Funding Heading Back to Pre-Bubble Levels”

  1. I don’t think anyone is saying the 1 month increase is a trend. The seed/early stage amount is still in line with patterns from the past 3 years. Only the expansion and later stages show dramatic changes from the past. Perhaps, VC’s are giving less time to companies to prove themselves, which means acceptance of less risk which is a good thing overall for everyone. We’ve seen what lack of risk aversion practices have done to the dot coms and real estate markets within the last 10 years. It is interesting that the “dismal exit environment” may be the key to lack of 2nd and 3rd stage funding. This may be an undertone that investors are looking to flip companies in even shorter time frames than in the past. Could this pressure to turn a profit more quickly mean even longer work hours for software developers, additional strains on work/life balances, etc?