Is The New York Times considering taking money from foundations to fund its news ops? So says Craig Whitney, AME at the Times, in an interview with Poynter’s Bill Mitchell. I highly doubt this is an officially sanctioned view within NYTCo (NYSE: NYT), as the move, as the company is currently structured, is fraught with various political and financial pitfalls. Even if it does, it might be a separate structure on the lines of ProPublica (which it is already working with, in more ways than one), where funding something that would then feed into NYT, and even then probably not exclusively.
Update: From NYT spokesperson Catherine Mathis: “Right now we are doing a lot of qualitative and quantitative research. It’s too early to determine what we’ll do with of the things currently under consideration or those that may come up in the course of our research. Specifically, with regard to nonprofit support, we have not made any approaches to nonprofits.”
Update 2: NYT public editor Clark Hoyt writes today about NYT working with a freelance journalist and the unusual funding route for the investigative story. The story also mentions that Times executives and editors have discussed seeking foundation support to underwrite sections of the paper or categories of news, like Science Times.
Whitney’s quote: “We’ve begun to ask ourselves whether it would be possible to get the kind of support that NPR does from foundations for its journalism…[but they] haven’t reached any conclusions and we haven’t gone to any foundations.” Which is probably what it will be for a while. Unless the ownership changes hands. This comes the same week that Arthur Sulzberger and Janet Robinson told their staff in a memo that they would be able to manage the $1 billion debt the company is under.

Comments have been disabled for this post