Blog Post

Google Questions Street View Opponent’s Microsoft Links

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

The privacy concern over Google’s Street View UK just got ugly, erupting in to a turf war between the Big “G” and a lobby group it says is too close to rival Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT). Privacy International director Simon Davies filed a complaint about the service with the Information Commissioner’s Office on Monday. Wednesday night, he wrote his second letter in as many years to Google CEO Eric Schmidt, complaining Google (NSDQ: GOOG) is conducting a “smear campaign” against him.

Davies claimed Google, which was in 2007 placed bottom of a 23-strong internet privacy table by Privacy International, is telling journalists that Microsoft pays two of the group’s members to stay quiet about its privacy transgressions. Davies said Google is claiming Privacy International has “entered in to a secret pact to discredit Google” by taking Microsoft money through two of its staff’s directorships of a separate privacy consultancy, 80/20 Thinking, and by the involvement of Microsoft PR agency Burston-Marsteller as an 80/20 partner. Denying a plot, Davies’ letter told Schmidt: “You should be ashamed of your actions. Google is coming across as a desperate company resorting to desperate measures.”

Google gave, which has more info, an unusually frank response: “It’s no secret that we believe the credibility of his criticisms is undermined by the fact that, alongside his work for Privacy International, he acts as a consultant to a number of technology companies who are direct rivals to, and in some cases vocal critics of, Google – a fact that he rarely seems to disclose in his press releases or comments to the media.” For more on the Microsoft-Google counterlobbying war, read this recent Wired feature.

— And here, explore Microsoft’s Victoria, London, HQ via Google Street View…


One Response to “Google Questions Street View Opponent’s Microsoft Links”

  1. I simply don't understand how Privacy International can sustain a claim to be independent, while their Director (Simon Davies) is gagged by his commercial relationships with companies like Phorm.

    PI complaints about Google are well founded, but PI silence concerning Phorm is simply self evident bias brought about by Simon Davis commercial deals.

    Privacy International and 80/20 Thinking need to part company.