Looks like we’re not the only ones having a positive experience with Windows 7. In today’s WSJ, Walt Mossberg offers a first impression on the beta operating system from Microsoft. He likes the less intrusive warnings and “nag screens” and I agree with him. One of the benefits I find in Mac OS X is how the operating system isn’t in the way. It’s just there to provide you a safe and usable environment. I’m finding that Windows 7 is much the same in that respect.
We can’t put final thoughts together on performance of Windows 7 as compared to Vista, but on the two notebooks Mossberg tested, he sees a huge improvement. His Sony VAIO “had been a dog using Vista” but now is faster booting, resuming from sleep and opening applications. My experience is that Windows 7 is at least as fast performing as Vista with those same tasks. Bear in mind however, I’m using Windows 7 on a netbook with limited specifications; the fact that it’s no worse or is marginally better is a good sign to me.
Mossberg points out two issues he sees at this point. First, there’s no current method to upgrade to Windows 7 from Windows XP. That is going to be a huge problem for many potential users of the new OS if it’s not addressed by Microsoft. I suspect they’ll address that as we get closer to a launch.
The other issue mentioned is how many applications that used to come with Windows are no longer included with Windows 7. I don’t view this as an issue, but more of a compromise and conscious choice for a better experience overall. Software like Mail, Photo Gallery, Movie Maker and more won’t be included with Windows 7, but that doesn’t mean you can’t get them. Microsoft is offering them as a free download with their Windows Live Essentials. I’m not so sure that this is a negative point. Sure, you never want to lose functionality when you upgrade something. I understand that point, but you haven’t “lost” these applications; they’re simply not included with the base install.
These were left out to simplify the installation process and so that applications people don’t want aren’t crammed down their throats. If you want ‘em, go get ‘em. If you don’t, you won’t have to waste time hunting for ways to uninstall them. It’s a compromise of sorts and you can’t have it both ways. Maybe the best compromise option is a custom default web page in Internet Explorer that explains this situation and offers a direct link to the Windows Live Essentials installation site. How would you handle it?
{"source":"https:\/\/gigaom.com\/2009\/01\/22\/mossberg-windows-7-leaves-vista-in-the-dust\/wijax\/49e8740702c6da9341d50357217fb629","varname":"wijax_04252ed81914892637ec11d8c4fb893c","title_element":"header","title_class":"widget-title","title_before":"%3Cheader%20class%3D%22widget-title%22%3E","title_after":"%3C%2Fheader%3E"}