In His Stead: A Look at Tim Cook and What He Means for Apple


ref_05cookBy now, you’ll all have heard about Steve Jobs’ decision to take a temporary leave of absence in the face of growing health concerns, and you’ll also likely have have heard that Apple COO Tim Cook will be stepping in as acting CEO while he’s away. In the wake of the significant losses Apple’s stock prices have taken, it’s understandable to want to take a closer look at just who Tim Cook is, and, more importantly, at what he’ll mean for Apple with Jobs sidelined.

Despite definite personality differences (Jobs is animated while Cook is generally cool and reserved), most accounts agree that Cook will not bring any major changes in management style to the company. According to a statement to by former Apple employee Mike Janes, who was in charge of the online Apple Store for five years, Cook has in fact already been running the company for many years, while Jobs has been the public leader.

Tim Cook’s Background

Cook joined Apple when things were not looking so bright for the computer company. He is credited with having helped turn the company around following his arrival in 1998, when he helped to correct manufacturing inefficiencies that were taking a big chunk out of Apple’s bottom line. Prior to Apple, Cook boasts an impressive resumé, with stints at Compaq and IBM.

Known for his boundless energy, Cook is a dedicated cyclist, and sits on Nike’s board of directors. Sitting on another company’s board is another trait he shares with Jobs, and the two are the only Apple executives to do so.

Cook is no stranger to filling Jobs’ shoes. He did so in 2004 when Jobs left for over a month to undergo treatment for pancreatic cancer. This time around, the situation is more grave, owing both to the proposed length of Steve’s leave, and to the perceived seriousness of his medical condition. We suggested yesterday that there may be more to this issue than meets the eye, and, judging by Wall Street’s reaction, many others tend to agree.

So What Does He Mean for Apple?

So what will Tim Cook mean for Apple this time around? All evidence suggests that he is a “stay the course” kind of guy, as befits an interim CEO. That’s all well and good, but when you’re Apple, you depend on a certain amount of dazzle, mystery, and intrigue to maintain your brand image and promote growth. Keeping the ship on an even keel is fine for a month or two, but over the course of six months, you risk becoming boring.

From now until June, Cook’s moves will be highly scrutinized. I don’t necessarily predict stunt moves and events, but I do expect some kind of hardware unveil, and possibly Snow Leopard’s introduction, between now and then, in an effort to recapture some momentum. The lackluster Macworld keynote, with its exhaustively detailed iLife ’09 review, might’ve had some major reveals taken out at the last minute to save some wow factor for Cook to bring out while Jobs is away.

Make no mistake, this is an audition for Cook. An audition for Apple shareholders, stakeholders, and likely, for Jobs himself. How well he performs will likely determine whether that “interim” ever gets dropped from his title, and possibly, the future of Apple as a company.


Phone Address

Thats what I thought and you really helped me prove my point with this post. I cant wait to show my friend so he can see he was wrong. – Walter

Vivek Sanghi

First, I wish Steve the best and hope he pulls through his health challenges safely.
At the same time, I hope Tim is highly successful in his job an the interim CEO, since doing so will help Apple; in my view the most innovative consumer focused company today; get rid of the ‘no future beyond Jobs’ label; which I honestly believe is ill founded.

In my view, Apple has attained its enviable status and market position, based on the single minded pursuit by its people to delight their customers with innovative products.
While its true Steve is the one who originally infused the above flavor into Apple, the people at Apple are smart and savvy enough to have learned from their fearless leader; to not only carry forward, but even grow the above recipe. After all, if this was not to be the case, our human civilization couldn’t have evolved and advanced over the centuries!



I think you are still making the mistake that most seem to make here by conflating “running the company” with being a showman and running the product announcements. Tim Cook really *does* kind of run the company right now and has for a while. Snappy product announcements are not his forte, and nor are they really the purview of the CEO. Tim doesn’t need to dazzle or have any pizzaz announcing products and can be a fantastic CEO without that.

Similarly, the design of the products was never really up to Jobs. It’s not like he sat in the lab pulling long hours designing stuff. Apple will continue to have good products because the people that actually design them are still healthy and working hard at Cupertino. My understanding is that Jobs’ role in product design is only as a taste arbiter. Jobs, Ive, and Schiller typically would meet and examine up and coming products and give their feedback, but this also happens at many other levels before it reaches them. Jobs does have extraordinary taste and an instinctive feel for what’s right or wrong with a design, but others do as well.

Comments are closed.