Blog Post

10-Q Watch: NYTCo Takes $166 Million Writedown For New England Media Group; Faces $400M Refinancing

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

imageThe New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT) filed its 10-Q with the SEC Friday and it’s not a pretty sight. The company projected a $140-150 million write down for the New England Media Group when it reported Q3 results Oct. 23; the number reported in the 10-Q is $166 million with adjustments to come in Q4. That puts the Q3 loss for the News Media Group at $153 million and the overall loss for Q3 slightly over $106 million.

The company has two $400 million revolving credit agreements, one due in May 2009 and one in 2011. S&P lowered its rating twice this year, the second time below investment grade; Moody’s has lowered its rating once and serviced notice that it may do so again. As we reported recently, NYTCo isn’t in danger of breaching its covenants; there are also no accelerated payments subject to ratings downgrades. But the downgrades do make financing trickier and more expensive — and they almost certainly guarantee that the company faces more restrictive covenants. From the 10-Q: “We are evaluating future financing arrangements and are in discussions with our lenders regarding the expiration of one of our credit agreements, scheduled for May 2009. Based on these discussions, we expect that we will be able to manage our debt and credit obligations as they mature.” (For the dramatic interpretation, read this from SAI while listening to Celine Dion. Update: Should have added that one of SAI’s investors is Kohlberg Ventures, which is run by James Kohlberg, one of the dissident shareholders appointed to the NYTCo board.)

During the Q3 call, CFO James Follo said the board is exploring reducing dividends and this was repeated in the filing. Given what we’ve seen of late at other companies, reducing or eliminating the dividend likely will be a prerequisite. So far this year, NYTCO has paid out nearly $100 million in dividends; including that amount, the company has paid shareholders roughly $420 million over the last four years. The board even increased the per share amount by $.55 in mid-2007 and has used the credit lines to pay dividends.

Cost cutting: One area where the NYTCo plans to save money: retiree health costs. In late October, the company amended its retiree medical plan to eliminate post-age 65 benefits and to reduce the company’s contribution for non-union employees next year. Estimated savings: about $24 million in 2009. Other changes should reduce pension and benefits obligations by roughly $90 million.

Photo Credit: Robert Scoble

2 Responses to “10-Q Watch: NYTCo Takes $166 Million Writedown For New England Media Group; Faces $400M Refinancing”

  1. digital bear

    he Times is long over due in reducing these benefits– what modern company offers the pension & retirement benefits that the old world companies do? Look at the auto industry as a case study in corporate socialism as required by unions has led them to make stupid decisions to meet near term obligations rather than proper restructuring for a new set of "benefit dynamics." Certainly no new media, technology or small businesses are offering the rich benefits that old time Times employees receive.

    The irony is that internally, Times employees are eagerly awaiting the overdue retirement of the NYTimes Digital head who is due to retire in 2 years. He is waiting for his pension vesting to be maximized– talk about an old-world mentality in a new-world role– sort of a telling commentary on how they've missed the boat a few times!

  2. I love how the Sulzbergers, who have been using the Times as a pulpit for promoting the interests of the poor and the middle class over the wealthy for so long, act like hardcore republicans when push comes to shove in their own pocketbooks. They cut benefits to their elderly retired blue collar and middle class employees so they can keep paying dividends to the rich family shareholders; they replace cash with stock in employees' 401k's so they can keep the cash for their family; they further damage their credit rating by taking out loans to line their own pockets. Unbelievable. Glad they still see themselves as stewards of the Times's mission….