Kevin and I attended Dell’s online press event today where they unveiled 10 new Latitude notebooks including the one that caught our eye, the 12-inch e4200 ultra-portable. Dell had a recurring theme during the press event with their claims of extended battery life, in fact they kept mentioning a 19-hour possible battery life. They explained that this extended battery life was possible due to the use of a 9-cell primary battery along with a slice battery. Since I have been using the HP 2710p for over a year with a similar setup I wanted to take a look at Dell’s claim for high battery life and see how I think that will work out in the real world.
First up I went to Dell’s web site and went through the informationthey provide for the e4200. This is the only notebook they announcedtoday that uses the Ultra-Low Voltage (ULV) processor which willprovide the best battery life, far better than the standard Core 2 Duoin the other models. Surprisingly I found that the e4200 is onlyavailable with either a 4-cell or 6-cell primary battery. I comparethis to the HP 2710p which has a 6-cell battery, the same size screenand roughly the same size and weight. In fact if you compare thetechnical specifications for the two notebooks they are surprisinglysimilar even though the 2710p has been out for quite some time. Notetoo that the HP is a Tablet PC with a swivel screen which adds roughlyhalf a pound in weight and should use a tad more battery as a result.The 2710p with the 6-cell battery provides about 5.5 hours of life on asingle charge and I expect the Dell e4200 will provide about the samesince the components are roughly the same.
Dell’s claims of 19 hour battery life will not then apply to the e4200with only a maximum 6-cell battery. In fact the cheapest configurationof the e4200 is a 4-cell battery which I wouldn’t expect to last forover 4 hours. A 5.5 hour life with the 6-cell is decent enough solet’s use that in the rest of our analysis. Dell says to pair thatinternal battery with a slice battery to get up to 16 hours of life onthe e4200. Search though I did I can’t yet see an option for a slicebattery for the e4200 but that’s probably because it’s not availableyet. I use a similar slice battery for the 2710p which adds anotherthin 6-cell battery that clips on the bottom of the notebook. Togetherwith the internal battery that totals 12 cells of battery and I getabout 11 hours total which is darn good. The beauty of the HP slicebattery is how thin and light (1.24 lbs.) it is so even if Dell goeswith a higher capacity (and thicker) battery it won’t be bigger than 8cells in my opnion. Since battery life is directly related to how manycells the battery contains I’d estimate about 7.5 hours of battery lifeon an 8 cell. Note that the 8-cell battery would likely weigh near 2lbs. making it as heavy as the e4200.
Based on my calculations the Dell e4200 with a total of 14 cells ofbattery would likely last about 13 hours, a decent battery life to besure but a far cry from the 16 hours that Dell is claiming. Now it’spossible that Dell is looking at bigger batteries, maybe an extendedprimary battery that sticks out of the e4200 and a bigger slicebattery. Both of those options will be bulky and heavy andthus defeat what the thin and light e4200 brings to the table. I wouldestimate that 16 hours of battery life would require a good 3.5 lbs ofbatteries pushing the weight of that svelte e4200 up to over 5 pounds.That’s not a bad sacrifice for such high battery life but it’simportant for those who are interested to realize that in spite of howDell glossed over that fact there is still a stiff weight penalty forhigh battery life. Dell hasn’t invented some new battery technologyhere, they are simply attaching much bigger batteries to the newLatitudes. One thing that has surprised me from this analysis is howadvanced the technology is behind the HP 2710p compared to this brandnew Dell. It’s almost the same computer with the addition of theTablet bits.