For the Future of Marketing, Look to Social Media


There was a time not too long ago when the business implications of social media were unclear; resistance to it on the part of corporations, therefore, was somewhat understandable. Web 2.0 seemed like just the next Internet fad in a series of many, and while it was viewed as having value for individuals and enthusiasts, it didn’t seem viable for corporate use. But corporations need to realize that social media is here to stay — and that in it lies the future of marketing.

According to a recent BusinessWeek article, 11.2 percent of online adults in the U.S. publish content on a blog at least once a month, 24.8 percent read blog content and 13.7 percent comment on it. And the younger the demographic, the higher the number. The days of mainstream media monopolizing information is long gone, with certain blogs attracting millions of visitors each month as people seek out a more personal spin on information. And as the web becomes more social, people are beginning to value relationships and conversations more than the passive consumption of information. BusinessWeek’s concluding advice: “Catch up…or catch you later.” [digg=]

Social media is a lot more than just blogs, however, and a combination of blogs, social news and networking sites, along with new ways of consuming media online (YouTube, Flickr, have changed the world of marketing and advertising. No longer is it just about broadcasting your pitch and plastering your message all over the place; instead people expect corporations to engage with them through social platforms in a person-to-person fashion. As Bob Metcalfe notes:

People listen better and longer when you just talk to them and listen back. All too often professional marketers lose their credibility by hyperbole, hubris and amplification. It seems to me self evident that just talking with people is more effective than shouting and repeating yourself as if your audience was comprised of deaf idiots.

One term used to describe this evolution is Social Media Marketing; another is Conversational Marketing — a practice that involves engagement and interaction, a two-way communication rather than a one-way flow of information. While some companies continue to struggle with this new form of marketing, others have embraced it wholeheartedly. One such company is Samsung, as is evident in the marketing strategy for their latest phone.

Rather than relying on traditional forms of marketing, Samsung has created brand and product pages on the leading social networking platforms such as MySpace, Facebook and Bebo and has launched a campaign that places the role of marketing the product squarely in the hands of their current (and potential) customers. The company is asking them to record songs and upload them to a community that Samsung has created where others vote for the ones they like best; the four winning songs will be featured in a national radio and online ad campaign.

This is a great example of embracing not only social networks as marketing platforms but also user-generated content as conversational marketing. If it works, it will get Samsung’s new phone marketed through word of mouth, with advertisement campaigns generated by actual people who would use their products.

With clear evidence that brute-force marketing is no longer as effective as it once was, what I find surprising is that more companies aren’t working with their communities this way. They must not understand the value of conversational marketing, in particular of social shopping, whereby people make online shopping decisions based on what their network of friends has previously bought and the recommendations they make. According to an AMA survey from 2006 (the most current I could find), the social shopping industry is already on track to be a multibillion-dollar industry. In the survey, 47 percent of consumers said that they would be open to using social networks to find and discuss holiday gift ideas, 51 percent said that, given the option, they would look for discounts on social networking sites. When it comes to downloading coupons from social networking sites, 51 percent said that they would do that, and another 18 percent said that they would participate on such sites by (reading or) writing product reviews. Most importantly, 29 percent said that they would actually make purchases through these sites.

In other words, if corporations want to make their advertising truly effective, they need to get social.

Muhammad Saleem is a social media consultant and a top-ranked community member on multiple social news sites.


Robin Goel

Great article. I agree with your points but when people are taking about Social Media, I think they make confused themselves. I did the Social Media projects from most of the clients mostly small business and startups but after stating them crystal clearly that Social Media cannot bring the hardcore money from the 1st day of implementation, still they think it is used to drive money into their businesses. I am sure people think Social Media Marketing is another name of Social Media selling.


Great article. I completely agree with you that social media holds a lot of answer to marketing.

Smack MacDougal

Web 2.0 is not “Social Media”.
You’ve conflated two unrelated concepts, Muhammad Saleem.

Web 2.0 means using Javascript to make ongoing server calls to update data objects already rendered on a web page.

Social Media are web sites like Facebook, MySpace, others, where folks set up their own web presence, typically a blog with comments, a friends board and connection to others they know through email or cell phone numbers through the web site servers databases.


Nice article! And some intersting comments with which I also agree. Main problem: A lot of brands or the responsible management members are still thinking in the old days mode. They just do not want to realize that successful campaigns of today are very different from campaigns that succeeded just a few years ago (before almost everybody was online, loves to participate and take action instead of just sitting beside listening). But that is another discussion;-)

One thing I would suggest to enhance the concept of samsung is that the best songs are not “only” featured on radio or in an ad-campaign but also get preinstalled on the new samsung phone as a rington. Just an idea…

Dennis Pannuto

You’re right on!

Most corps are still stumbling over themselves in accepting this reality but some are moving significant resources to social media marketing. We’re working with some corps to make this shift.

Victoria Ransom

Awesome article. Thanks so much Muhammad.

Samsung’s contest is a creative and fun example of how to engage users but in my opinion even they are not taking full advantage of the power of social marketing (especially the power of social networks). By driving Facebook, MySpace and Bebo users outside of the social networks to interact with the “F400 Share” promotion they are failing to take advantage of the viral features of social networks like friend invites and newsfeeds.

I’ll admit that I’m rather biased regarding this topic because my company ( has created an app that enables companies to run promotions that are automatically integrated with the viral features of Facebook, but I nevertheless thought it might be worth pointing out the potential for Samsung to make their promotion even more social, viral and cutting edge!

Joshua Koopferstock

Excellent article, Muhammad.

The thing about branding is that there is always a conversation going on about your brand, the only question is whether you are oblivious to it, whether you hear it, or whether you are part of it.

If some of your brand conversation is on the web, it is that much easier for you to hear it (with search or google alerts, whatever) than if you are limited to hearing it offline (through focus groups, etc.).

If you hear the conversation, then you can react to it, but if you are part of it, you will be able to react much more quickly. Some companies are finding that their brand is being shaped swiftly and drastically by this conversation and that they need to be part of it so that they don’t lose control, while others are content to mostly sit back and listen, and then react later to what they hear. As more people bring their conversations to the web, I would expect more and more companies trying to get involved in those conversations.


Shiv Singh


Great article and I couldn’t agree with you more. However, I do feel that it isn’t enough to be simply engaging in the conversation. That’s just the beginning. I believe that social influence marketing which is about harnessing the social and peer influences leveraging social media platforms is where its at. You’ll find a lot of information on social influence marketing at

To treat it as simply marketing through social media channels or participating in a conversation is a simplification.

Martin Edic

Start with social media monitoring (our world), then analyze the conversations for sentiment, gender, age, location and influence. Then listen to the things people are saying; finally, participate rather than pitch. Easy to lay out but not so easy to implement. We offer a free tool that is not similar to Google Alerts which, unfortunately, is not real time, a critical factor when a reputation, for example, is being ruined by a fleeting rumor or group of malcontents working social media streams. Or a legitimate set of consumers that have a problem with a company.
Social media is the next layer of connectivity- global, live, diverse and unpredictable. Either a marketer’s dream or nightmare or both. Interesting times!


The conversation about products has been going on online as long as there has been an online. The smart companies have always figured out that this conversation *is* going on and that they can participate and leverage it. This has been going on long before we called it “Social Media.”

Of course back then the mainstream was pretty clueless there was an “online” to go to, much less that there are any interesting conversations there.



Does the opportunity to win a starring role in a *national* ad campaign not suggest that you’re highlighting the fun 10% of the campaign … while the serious dollars remain traditionally spent?


Tom O'Brien


Nice article – and one thing that I think is much misunderstood is the huge amount of brand and category related conversation going on that is not in either blogs or any kind of company owned or sponsored site.

The vast majority of online conversation is happening on communities with forums, web-boards, and yes, still newsgroups.

People do not need your (brand owner) permission OR sponsorship to talk about the things that interest them.

We help companies understand what is going on in the conversations and provide them with actionable insight using this understanding – take a look:




Loved your article. The rise of social networking and Web 2.0 is to (now) be considered commonplace in today’s digital world. As we all know, corporations often move to slow to adapt to changing market trends, unlike stealthy start-ups. The future of marketing is to be defined by us; the creators (innovators) and user(s). It’s quite possible that in the near future there could be a site that could fulfill the needs, wants and desires of a user’s everyday life and more, redefining the online social space and truly displaying the value of conversational marketing.

Rule of thumb…let the user(s) be your advocate for product or service. In the end, their opinion is what matters most.

Comments are closed.