Blog Post

Current's Claims of 'Profitability' Ring False

Parsing through Current Media‘s filing for a $100 million public offering, I kept stumbling over the financials section. The youth-oriented news company had a net loss of $9.8 million in 2007, based on revenue of $63.8 million. It lost $7.6 million in 2006 and $14.3 million in 2005. Altogether, Current had $36.5 million in debts as of the end of last year.

Yet until now, while the company — which is perhaps best known for being co-founded by Al Gore — wasn’t obligated by the government to tell the world, Current kept telling me it was profitable. Just last week an external PR person pitched me in an email: “Unlike so many Web 2.0 companies, they’re profitable.” And back in October, when Current was making its big online push, Joanna Drake Earl, the company’s president of new media, said in an in-person interview, “We continue to be profitable. It comes back to discipline. We didn’t want to spend marketing dollars.” I reported the situation as such in my write-up on Oct. 15.

I wasn’t the only one who took Current’s claims of profitability at face value. “Joel Hyatt is comfortably ensconced in his loft-style San Francisco office at Current TV, Al Gore’s now-profitable cable network,” wrote Fast Company last summer. “Hyatt says that Current TV is profitable and has been for nearly a year,” reported BusinessWeek in September. “Mr. Hyatt said Current TV, which is backed by two private equity firms and a group of business partners, including Ronald W. Burkle, the supermarket magnate, turned profitable in the fourth quarter of 2006, but would not give specifics,” said the New York Times in October.

Continue reading this full version of this story on NewTeeVee

4 Responses to “Current's Claims of 'Profitability' Ring False”

  1. I live in San Francisco and I just found out about Current and I love watching it. Whether or not they are profitable…I hope they end up doing well and sticking around.

    I like the new option I have for news…because the “Mainstream Media” is a domestic enemy of our Constitution.


  2. According to some honest folks who should know, the company is profitable. Apparently, large advertisers are paying top-of-market, for various reasons, even before the network is large enough for coverage from ratings services. The bigger story could be why.