Mostly anecdotal but web start-ups looking for venture funding may be facing increasing pressure from investors infatuated with online advertising as a faster, easier path to success than sales, subscriptions or commission. despite the continuing rise of U.S. online ad spend, most of those dollars tend to gravitate toward a few large sites. The WSJ suggests that leaves many start-ups wondering whether they can grab a significant slice of that pie and grow into large-enough companies that could actually make money for their investors.
The thesis behind all this: the emphasis on supporting a site with advertising reflects investors’ declining appetite for risk. As that theory goes, ad-driven sites tend to be less costly to run as there is no need for a customer-service team or upfront costs for physical goods.
U.S. investors in the first half of this year put $317 million into social nets, blogs and other “Web 2.0″ companies with an emphasis on advertising, a gain of almost 21 percent over the same period last year, according to research firm VentureOne. While some sites with different or mixed models are getting backing, others, like photo-and-video service EnjoyMyMedia that runs a few ads but mainly offers a paid service, say they’re having a tough time attracting investors as a result. But one of the chief examples offered by the Journal — online real-estate brokerage Redfin Corp.may not be the best: investors. Founder Glenn Kelman tells WSJ there’s pressure from investors because it’s not ad based, while investors who talked to the Journal offer other reasons for holding back.
Comments have been disabled for this post