PrudeTube: Violence Up, Boobs Down

17 Comments

When the Puritans landed on Plymouth Rock, and subsequently repaid the kindness of local tribes with wholesale slaughter, they bequeathed upon America the birthright of double standards. And lest you think that nearly 400 years later we’ve figured out that when given the choice between sex and violence, sex would generally seem the preferable option, take a look at YouTube and other popular video sharing services.

To illustrate my case, a couple of weeks ago a friend of mine came over and clued me into the All Hip Hop Rumors blog, which is a great source of hilarious YouTube clips. One clip in particular was footage of a rap battle that turns violent. In it, MC Nyckz spits a line that has become an instant classic and has inspired a trend: “Oh you mad ’cause I’m stylin on you.”

(Warning: This and other YouTube clips referenced may not be safe for work.)

The clip is behind YouTube’s ‘may offend’ warning wall, which seems practical. Other, vastly more violent clips associated with a “narco trafficante” blood feud, were pulled only after a media firestorm last week. While network execs whine about YouTube being able to filter out boobs but not clips from the boobtube, what I wonder is why they’ve put age and content controls in place to allow violence, but not sexuality? But first, let’s take a look at the rap-battle clip and the meme it started in order to give it some context.

Originally from a Long Island public access shoot, it ended up on DVD video mix “Real Talk TV: We Still in the Streets.” Then the clip hit YouTube on Dec. 11. The first mention I could find was in the Rap World forums, and the next day listed as both the top punch line and best YouTube clip by XXL Magazine blogger and music maven sickamore. Then Questlove dropped it on his vlog (yes, The Roots‘ genius and Chappelle’s Show regular has a vlog).

Rumors flew and the beef continued in interviews, with EnJ accusing Nyckz of brandishing a pistol, which Nyckz denied. Later in January, the entire segment from the DVD was posted in two parts, but it only added fuel to the fire. Meanwhile, the phrase took on a life of it’s own, and started spawning remixes. I especially love the kitty battle remix.

There is a long tradition of competitive, confrontational verbal gymnastics that’s probably older then history. Within that tradition, actual physical contact is considered taboo — hence the introductory title card, “Not ya typical rap battle.” That Nyckz goaded EnJ into throwing a punch is a testament to his ability, and stands as proof that EnJ lost the battle. The community which congregated around the clip (or anyone who’s seen Eminem’s 8 Mile) understands this.

I’m certainly not arguing that the clip should be taken down. What I’m arguing is that in allowing the thousands and thousands of other clips with violent content but working feverishly to keep explicitly erotic content unavailable, YouTube isn’t content-neutral at all, but a powerful force working to perpetuate and even spread certain values regarding what is and what isn’t acceptable content and behavior.

My friend Violet Blue has pointed out that YouTube turned away from an early history of allowing erotic content, and that in the run up to and completion of their sale to Google, the pace and accuracy of YouTube’s censorship of explicit sexuality picked up. If you’re a Google investor, you might be wondering why they would completely cede an entire market to the competition instead of taking steps to preserve the profit potential there.

An analogy for the reasoning that seems to be at work can once again be made with the history of the motion picture industry. Mainstream studios voluntarily censor themselves in order to avoid legal liability and government censorship. Agreements like the Production Code and, more recently, the secretive, incredibly arbitrary example set by the MPAA ratings board — which was so exquisitely exposed in the documentary This Film is Not Yet Rated.

YouTube is actually hosting a clip from the film (for now) that illustrates my point. The MPAA’s motivations become clear when you begin to pile up examples of just what is and isn’t allowed. Now read Section C of YouTube’s Terms of Use and then compare that statement to the content enforcement on the site — rinse and repeat for the other top video services. “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.”

17 Comments

Jackson West

Well, if the internet could provide the Library of Congress’ special collection of source documents from the colonial era, by all means I’d reference it here. But they’d need all sorts of public funding to make that happen.

Still, you’re right. The apple orchard land seized at considerable cost to the government from the Nez Perces does roughly compare to the orange grove land seized from the Seminoles at an equally considerable cost in the 19th century.

Jackson West

Read on in that Wikipedia article and it talks about how the Narraganset allies of the Massachusets Bay and Plymouth Rock colonists did abandon them after the leader of the colonial troops set an encampment alight, burning hundreds of men, women and children in one fell swoop.

And of course, that was just the first war on the natives against the local population — King Phillip’s War two generations later was also led by the Puritans of Massachusetts Bay and Plymouth.

Still qualifies as a tradition of double standards in my book, since sexual indiscretion received harsh punishment but violence was justifiable and even blessed in their worldview.

Richard Bennett

“Hundreds were killed; hundreds more were captured and sold into slavery to the West Indies.”

That’s not wholesale, it’s retail. The truth is that American Indian populations in the Northeast had already been reduced 90% by the time the Puritans arrived thanks to diseases introduced by French traders, some spread by sexual contact.

Oops.

Anatman

An excellent article, very well written.

Consider also the rating system for hollywood movies:

If naked breasts are being fondled, it gets an “NC-17” rating (just below “X” rating).

If naked breasts are being slashed and stabbed by a homicidal maniac, it gets an “R” rating (less restrictive than NC-17).

The message is clear. Eroticism is extremely dangerous – more so than knife-wielding maniacs.

john

The UK’s Sun newspaper ran a story last week about Dr Chris Steele of the UK ITV This Morning TV show who posted videos to YouTube showing live breast and testicle self-examinations.
These are now rated 18+ even though they are medically informative and potentially life-saving.

The videos are at
http://www.thefamilygp.com/self

So now our kids can watch gangsters “bigging” themselves up but can’t learn how to look after themselves.

Florn Sibbaldson

Surely the troubling-est angle is that Americans seem to love most some violence mixed with some soft-core eroticism? Either, on its own, doesn’t seem to do the trick for y’all.

Vince

Dead on! I still haven’t been able to figure out where this self-imposed Puritanism from the MPAA, the FCC and the networks in general came from. After all where are the laws against sex? I’m much more worried about my kids stumbling upon a wrestling competition than some nudity on TV. The paradox here is that it takes 2 seconds of reading printed or online press in Europe to confirm that sex sells, so why our otherwise revenue-driven networks keep ignoring this is beyond me.

Aron

“When the Puritans landed on Plymouth Rock, and subsequently repaid the kindness of local tribes with wholesale slaughter, they bequeathed upon America the birthright of double standards.”

The best summarized representation of the “American Attitude”

Kudos.

Jackson West

Yes, truth is very often stranger than fiction, Mr. Bennett.

The Pequot War was an armed conflict in 1637 between an alliance of Massachusetts Bay and Plymouth colonies, with American Indian allies (the Narragansett, and Mohegan Indians), against the Pequot Indians. This war saw the elimination of the Pequot as a viable polity in what is present-day southern New England.

Hundreds were killed; hundreds more were captured and sold into slavery to the West Indies.”

Richard Bennett

Tell me more about that thing where the Puritans “repay the kindness of local tribes with wholesale slaughter”, it sounds like the kind of fantasy that would make a cool movie.

Comments are closed.