Blog Post

Mozilla Discloses 2005 Revenues: $53M

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

While the most interesting thing about Mozilla is most definitely its excellent Firefox browser, it’s also noteworthy that the non-profit makes quite a bit of money. Today, Mozilla CEO Mitchell Baker wrote on her blog that the Mozilla Foundation (which owns the subsidiary Mozilla Corporation, created in part to deal with the cash flow) made $52.9 million in revenue in 2005.

Baker said the “bulk” of the money comes from “search engine relationships” like the crucial one Mozilla brokered with Google for default search box placement in the chrome of the Firefox browser.

These are some very profitable arrangements, ones that have opened up a new category of business model now used by browser and plug-in companies, such as Opera. Mozilla spent $8.2 million in 2005, leaving $44.7 million in profit for what Baker calls “a reserve fund.”

Last year speculation ran rampant after the figure $72 million was floated as a yearly revenue estimate for Firefox. (Incidentally, this guesstimate originated with the CEO of Browster, a company we covered today under very different circumstances.) Today’s blog post is the first time Mozilla has publicly addressed the 2005 revenue information in detail.

Previous revenue figures of $2.4 million in 2003 and $5.8 million in 2004 are publicly available (if a little slow to be released) because the foundation is a non-profit. Mozilla has also added them to its own site. Baker did not give estimates for 2006 revenue, though she said it remained “steady.”

See more detail in this cover story I wrote about Mozilla for Red Herring.

5 Responses to “Mozilla Discloses 2005 Revenues: $53M”

  1. @Desi Boy
    They aren’t required to disclose their profits, but I think it’s good to know about it for the public, it’s simply a matter of transparency.

    They haven’t CPM – most revenues come from the search deals where they earn a portion of the clicked ads on Google’s search page (or Yahoo’s in Asian area, where Yahoo! is the default search engine).
    But, given that they disclosed the revenues for 2005 at the beginning of 2007, don’t expect the 2006-revenues to be disclosed very soon.

  2. Donnie Donor

    It would be nice of them to use their profits to repay their donors. A non-profit should remain non-profit – they can repay back the donations, and still keep enough money as “reserve”.

  3. wow Google made their day ..but i don’t understand why a non profit organization would hesitate in disclosing their profit? either way they are doing this for the common peoples good right? so what is the point if they hide it?