Blog Post

Inside The Venice Project & Exclusive Screen Shots

Stay on Top of Enterprise Technology Trends

Get updates impacting your industry from our GigaOm Research Community
Join the Community!

Ever since we interviewed Janus Friis, the co-founder of Skype about The Venice Project, his latest start-up that plans to use peer-to-peer technology to disrupt the television industry, we have been intrigued and have been dying to get a look at the service.

theveniceproject.gifEven though they have launched a beta program, an invite to the service hasn’t been forthcoming. Like a lot of you who left a comment in response to a previous post, looking for an invite, we don’t have one either. But that didn’t stop us from trying to get a peek at the service, and now we have, thanks to some well-placed friends who were willing to share their exclusive access for exactly 30 minutes. What follows is a firsthand look at the Venice Project and what we found inside the most awaited new application on planet broadband.

venicesetup1.gifAfter you log into the service you are taken to a download page, where you can download the latest build. For now, The Venice Project works exclusively on Windows XP Service Pack 2 edition. It takes less than a minute to download on a decent cable or DSL connection, and the install is pretty straightforward.

venicesetup2.gifIn fact, I would venture to say that it is as simple to install the Venice Project software as Skype, which shouldn’t come as a surprise given Janus’ obsession with usability. The installation consumes about 250 MB per hour, the company says, which makes it one of the true broadband applications. I wonder what the incumbent service providers will have to say about this! But that’s a topic of discussion for another day. Once you install, I recommend that you reboot, though the service doesn’t require you to do so.

Post reboot, you are good to go. Double click on the icon that sits on your desktop (or in the dock) and that’s it, you are taken to a start screen, which shows some of the default channel options, staff picks and all that beta stuff. I am going to let the screenshots speak for themselves, instead of trying to explain what it looks like and how it all works.

Let’s talk instead about the service in general. I had heard from a lot of people who were lukewarm on the offering and were not impressed by the photo quality. I am not sure what happened, but those problems have been fixed. The visuals on a Lenovo T60 with a 15.2-inch screen were stunning and crisp. The streams came through without a problem and there was very little jitter. Still, no point hooking it up to a big screen TV… just yet! There isn’t LIVE TV content on the service right now and most of what is there consists of meager offerings streaming off the Venice Project servers. So you can’t truly judge how good this service will be when it comes to “live” broadcasts just yet.

There was a noticeable lag in switching channels, or between different menu choices. But as I said, these will go away with time. Setting up “my channels” was fairly simple. You just double-click and keep adding channels (or programs) you want to watch. Removing them was equally simple. It is very “dummy proof” and they have done a good job of organizing the service in a way that you can visually navigate without reading a manual.

I also liked that there are a lot of social elements built into the service. There is a “plugins” feature but not much there except the chat. You can chat with your buddies, or you can set up a “program or channel specific” chat network. I am guessing this is where a lot of innovation is going to come.

So how does this stack-up against say a Skype or Kazaa, the two previous startups that were a Janus & Niklas co-production? I think from a disruptive standpoint, it is right up there with those two. Free Phone Calls, Free Music… Free Television… pretty easy to understand the unique selling proposition.

However, unlike Skype which had “forced viral distribution” built into its business model, this one needs content… a lot of quality content. Large media companies, globally, would like to get their pound of flesh from the Venice Project (now that the Skype boys are all rich, they can pay right!). The technology certainly works, and for content providers – say the Disney and Viacoms of the world – this is a pretty good thing. It frees them up from the carriage providers and gives them a global audience.

I saw some clips with ads embedded in them, and they worked just like plain old television. With a more directed audience, and targeted ad distribution platforms such as one from SpotRunner, can turn this into a win-win for everyone. More on this when we get our official invite.

digg_url = ‘’;

103 Responses to “Inside The Venice Project & Exclusive Screen Shots”

  1. My two cents…
    I just started beta-testing today and my first impressions are an enthusiastic two thumbs-up. Cool interface, easy navigation, great video quality. I think it will be a definite winner!!!

  2. i tried it out this weekend (i have no invites) and thought the service was very slow, and heavy on memory usage. The content was nothing special. the quality was ok (could be my nvidia 64mb video card)

  3. Sure the Venice project can do live streaming and its on their roadmap like every other major p2p developer around but live sports is a nightmare for rights issues .Another p2p network that can stream live is LX systems .

  4. JpZero&One

    The Vinice project is nice, but I am a sports fan. And as such want to see sports events leagally (yes licit, not stollen- and I do not mind paying for them to support my teams). Will the Vinice project ever be live (yes live as in watch now while it is happening, as in sports, weather, news, etc)? ? ?

  5. global media guru

    P2P is ok for music, software
    is bad for video
    P2P a video from a third party makes you not closer to a source video content,
    as due to bandwidth
    P2P software was off-line activity
    P2P music – low bandwith semi-live activity

  6. Some of us have rather high resolution screens, all these vidoe sites, software, services need to seriously up the video quality.
    Watching a pixelated Youtube video on a high res screen is painful.
    Said video is about the size of a small PostIt note and still pixelated. Gives me a headache!

    Props to OM for getting access and taking screenies! This service may be worth a shot…

    Thanks OM!

  7. content providers or producers of all media like books music movies programs are all trying to hold on to their products to reshow later on.However emile you tube etc all allow anyone to be able to copy and offer the show book songs immediately. Soproducers must do it first and must think its aone shot deal. Venice offers a way to make a buck by foing righttothe net and bypassing the pirate, the emuler, the you tubnick..Im sure cbs nbs hbo will all follow with free content online ad supported…internet is the new cable , the new dish the new way the freeway…

  8. Im amazed that OM isnt foll0wing the offical screenshot policy .

    Cleared to blog

    You beta-testers want to blog. And we hear you! Unfortunately we’ve had to say no until now. But from hereon – that is perfectly possible.

    With one major exception: screenshots of the UI. The problem is not so much the UI, that one is ours, but the TV content you will always see behind our interface. Which is not ours.

    And unfortunately in most countries one needs to clear rights with the content owner, actor or other parties in order to be able to post these. So this means that you usually cannot publish a screenshot on your blog.

    So to solve this problem we’ve gone out to a few of the content owners and arranged this for you. In the last update you’ll find the URL.

    We’ll be adding a few more over the next couple of days (it takes time to go through all the paperwork). If there are specific ones you’d like us to clear, drop ‘[email protected]’ an email and we see what we can do!

    Thanks and have fun !


    Posted at 09 Dec @ 2:24 PM by Dirk-Willem van Gulik”

    There are copyright clarance issues and what ever OMs personal opinion is on copyright he should respect the policys of the venice Project and the copyright owners .

    Im sure the people form the Venice Project are being tolerant of OMs copyright infringement becuase of the publicity they are reciving .