Jon Friedman is really, really, really irked that anyone could classify Google, which gets the bulk of its revenue from advertising, as a media company. (He seems especially fixated on the idea that it came from a blogger, albeit a blogger who works for Knight-Ridder, throwing jabs with abandon, even though the item was a link to a story by The Hollywood Reporter.) Once he gets past all that, he asks a good question: “What is a media company in 2005 supposed to be, anyway?” Then tosses it away by returning to his question of the day: “Do you think Google should be classified as a media company – or as something else?”
So I’ll ask instead — how do you define a media company today? Drop me a line.
Speaking of fixations, I just saw an Online Journal headline: “Google Dips Below $280.”
Related: Google’s “Media Company” Lable Rankles
– Wall Street Dubs Google Most Valuable Media Company
Subscriber content
?
Subscriber content comes from Gigaom Research, bridging the gap between breaking news and long-tail research. Visit any of our reports to learn more and subscribe.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments have been disabled for this post