<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Users Pass on Paying for Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:06:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VPLLC Old School Productions</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VPLLC Old School Productions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;There are a lot of bad independent films out that managed to get made and / or distributed on Netflix/Youtube, but I wouldn&#039;t pay $4 to watch most of those films.  We live in an &quot;film is dead,&quot; high def camera era and there are too many independent filmmakers proving they can make an expensive/pro looking stuff but without compelling content.  Thrillers, shock topics, and contrived over dramas that look glossy and well lit but are cheesy or &quot;look what I can do&quot; movies.  Fortunately, every know and then someone will produce something real and just good, and they will sell that @ Netflix or through theaters but Youtube is more promotional or ad-revenue based territory than it is a box office.  All this is is a large company saying &quot;well what else can we do&quot; :D&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of bad independent films out that managed to get made and / or distributed on Netflix/Youtube, but I wouldn&#8217;t pay $4 to watch most of those films.  We live in an &#8220;film is dead,&#8221; high def camera era and there are too many independent filmmakers proving they can make an expensive/pro looking stuff but without compelling content.  Thrillers, shock topics, and contrived over dramas that look glossy and well lit but are cheesy or &#8220;look what I can do&#8221; movies.  Fortunately, every know and then someone will produce something real and just good, and they will sell that @ Netflix or through theaters but Youtube is more promotional or ad-revenue based territory than it is a box office.  All this is is a large company saying &#8220;well what else can we do&#8221; :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 18:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Out of principle, I will never pay money to watch a video on Youtube. Keep the internet free! When youtube videos are created for profit instead of for the sake of cultural enrichment, the whole reason to watch them in the first place dissipates. Hell, just look at the garbage we see in Hollywood. I already pay for an internet connection. What&#039;s next, a fee to use a search engine??&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of principle, I will never pay money to watch a video on Youtube. Keep the internet free! When youtube videos are created for profit instead of for the sake of cultural enrichment, the whole reason to watch them in the first place dissipates. Hell, just look at the garbage we see in Hollywood. I already pay for an internet connection. What&#8217;s next, a fee to use a search engine??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Store Still Tanks, Despite Oscar Fare</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Store Still Tanks, Despite Oscar Fare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 20:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] impressed by the offering, which allows them to stream a movie for 24 to 48 hours, with each title only seeing around 300 rentals over the course of their online opening weekend. YouTube told the New York Times back then that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] impressed by the offering, which allows them to stream a movie for 24 to 48 hours, with each title only seeing around 300 rentals over the course of their online opening weekend. YouTube told the New York Times back then that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Store Still Tanks, Despite Oscar Fare &#124; ztechblog.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Store Still Tanks, Despite Oscar Fare &#124; ztechblog.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 01:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] impressed by the offering, which allows them to stream a movie for 24 to 48 hours, with each title only seeing around 300 rentals over the course of their online opening weekend. YouTube told the New York Times back then that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] impressed by the offering, which allows them to stream a movie for 24 to 48 hours, with each title only seeing around 300 rentals over the course of their online opening weekend. YouTube told the New York Times back then that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Store Still Tanks, Despite Oscar Fare - A Collection of Latest Happening in Technology Field</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Store Still Tanks, Despite Oscar Fare - A Collection of Latest Happening in Technology Field]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 20:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] impressed by the offering, which allows them to stream a movie for 24 to 48 hours, with each title only seeing around 300 rentals over the course of their online opening weekend. YouTube told the New York Times back then that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] impressed by the offering, which allows them to stream a movie for 24 to 48 hours, with each title only seeing around 300 rentals over the course of their online opening weekend. YouTube told the New York Times back then that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Want to Rent a Movie on YouTube? Come Shop At the Store</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Want to Rent a Movie on YouTube? Come Shop At the Store]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean people will shop, though: As Ryan Lawler reported in January, the first week of the YouTube rental program brought in less than $6,000. We&#8217;d follow up on [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean people will shop, though: As Ryan Lawler reported in January, the first week of the YouTube rental program brought in less than $6,000. We&#8217;d follow up on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Expands Video Rental Program</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Expands Video Rental Program]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] each for a 48-hour viewing window. But neither YouTube nor the independent filmmakers involved made a lot of money from the offering. According to the NY Times, those films received a combined 2,684 views by the time the promotion [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] each for a 48-hour viewing window. But neither YouTube nor the independent filmmakers involved made a lot of money from the offering. According to the NY Times, those films received a combined 2,684 views by the time the promotion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Murphy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Murphy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi Ryan,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nice post. I quoted a few of the comments here in the post we published over at Vidli. It&#039;s a funny, relevant take why Youtube flocked up and why Vidli will take down Goliath.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ya&#039;ll deserve better than Youtube&#039;s rental service...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://twurl.nl/y833wf&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ryan,</p>
<p>Nice post. I quoted a few of the comments here in the post we published over at Vidli. It&#8217;s a funny, relevant take why Youtube flocked up and why Vidli will take down Goliath.</p>
<p>Ya&#8217;ll deserve better than Youtube&#8217;s rental service&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://twurl.nl/y833wf" rel="nofollow">http://twurl.nl/y833wf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sundance Experiments with the Future of Film Festivals &#124; The Future of Movies</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sundance Experiments with the Future of Film Festivals &#124; The Future of Movies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] as a complete and utter failure because it only brought in around $10,000 (at the time). A post at newteevee.com also calls it a failure and provides some numbers. Around 300 views per film. At $3.99 that is [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as a complete and utter failure because it only brought in around $10,000 (at the time). A post at newteevee.com also calls it a failure and provides some numbers. Around 300 views per film. At $3.99 that is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Mai</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Mai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I dont believe that the YouTube &quot;Experiment&quot; was a failure. It only ran for 10 days and proved there was a demand however small. For an independent producer this can become yet another revenue stream and it can all add up to bigger bucks when you gather up another possible angle of income.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are so used to think exclusivity, please start to think non-exclusivity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now it is possible for a producer to make a deal themselves with no expensive middleman and have their film online at multiple online retailers like Itunes, NetFlix, Amazon, TheAuteurs, Youtube etc, the more the merrier.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sundance title Back AssWards became the most sold film on Itunes on the indie section during Sundance see with 289 downloads after 2 days see http://sydneysbuzz.blogspot.com/2010/02/releasing-on-digital-platforms-first.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are talking about small films here not major block busters. This is not Avatar but independent films who can now have longevity and stay online instead of being yanked from the theaters and video stores after a short period. If the experiment had run for a year the numbers would be much higher. We have to look at the lifespan of the distribution and the possibility of actually having people find the film online, as opposed to 5 years ago when there was no alternative.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We have to embrace this new era of no Gatekeepers who can decide the fate and life of you and your movie. Now we are empowered as filmmakers to have our own distribution and make money while we are sleeping.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With Social Media, marketing and sales is possible for the even smallest production company.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Stop focusing on the small picture and see this in the great context of possibilities that now exists for filmmakers globally. Remember the film was only available on YouTube in the US. There is a whole world out there, America is still only 300 million people as opposed to more than 6 billion worldwide&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe this is the best time ever to be a filmmaker. Never has equipment been cheaper and distribution easier and dont get me started on Crowdfunding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Check out http://www.ageofstupid.net/money and MyMillionDollarMovie.com are great examples on Crowdfunding for films and how it is possible to raise funding for films in this digital edge.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can watch my presentation on VOD, Social Media &amp; Crowdfunding for free on Itunes http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=342575704&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;of if you dont have Itunes click here http://festivaldarlings.23video.com/video/526600/vod-and-what-it-means-to-the&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thomas Mai
www.MicroMajor.com&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont believe that the YouTube &#8220;Experiment&#8221; was a failure. It only ran for 10 days and proved there was a demand however small. For an independent producer this can become yet another revenue stream and it can all add up to bigger bucks when you gather up another possible angle of income.</p>
<p>We are so used to think exclusivity, please start to think non-exclusivity.</p>
<p>Now it is possible for a producer to make a deal themselves with no expensive middleman and have their film online at multiple online retailers like Itunes, NetFlix, Amazon, TheAuteurs, Youtube etc, the more the merrier.</p>
<p>Sundance title Back AssWards became the most sold film on Itunes on the indie section during Sundance see with 289 downloads after 2 days see <a href="http://sydneysbuzz.blogspot.com/2010/02/releasing-on-digital-platforms-first.html" rel="nofollow">http://sydneysbuzz.blogspot.com/2010/02/releasing-on-digital-platforms-first.html</a></p>
<p>We are talking about small films here not major block busters. This is not Avatar but independent films who can now have longevity and stay online instead of being yanked from the theaters and video stores after a short period. If the experiment had run for a year the numbers would be much higher. We have to look at the lifespan of the distribution and the possibility of actually having people find the film online, as opposed to 5 years ago when there was no alternative.</p>
<p>We have to embrace this new era of no Gatekeepers who can decide the fate and life of you and your movie. Now we are empowered as filmmakers to have our own distribution and make money while we are sleeping.</p>
<p>With Social Media, marketing and sales is possible for the even smallest production company.</p>
<p>Stop focusing on the small picture and see this in the great context of possibilities that now exists for filmmakers globally. Remember the film was only available on YouTube in the US. There is a whole world out there, America is still only 300 million people as opposed to more than 6 billion worldwide</p>
<p>I believe this is the best time ever to be a filmmaker. Never has equipment been cheaper and distribution easier and dont get me started on Crowdfunding.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.ageofstupid.net/money" rel="nofollow">http://www.ageofstupid.net/money</a> and MyMillionDollarMovie.com are great examples on Crowdfunding for films and how it is possible to raise funding for films in this digital edge.</p>
<p>You can watch my presentation on VOD, Social Media &amp; Crowdfunding for free on Itunes <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=342575704" rel="nofollow">http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=342575704</a></p>
<p>of if you dont have Itunes click here <a href="http://festivaldarlings.23video.com/video/526600/vod-and-what-it-means-to-the" rel="nofollow">http://festivaldarlings.23video.com/video/526600/vod-and-what-it-means-to-the</a></p>
<p>Thomas Mai<br />
<a href="http://www.MicroMajor.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MicroMajor.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Mai</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Mai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I dont believe that the YouTube &quot;Experiment&quot; was a failure. It only ran for 10 days and proved there was a demand however small. For an independent producer this can become yet another revenue stream and it can all add up to bigger bucks when you gather up another possible angle of income.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are so used to think exclusivity, please start to think non-exclusivity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now it is possible for a producer to make a deal themselves with no expensive middleman and have their film online at multiple online retailers like Itunes, NetFlix, Amazon, TheAuteurs, Youtube etc, the more the merrier.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sundance title Back AssWards became the most sold film on Itunes on the indie section during Sundance see with 289 downloads after 2 days see http://sydneysbuzz.blogspot.com/2010/02/releasing-on-digital-platforms-first.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are talking about small films here not major block busters. This is not Avatar but independent films who can now have longevity and stay online instead of being yanked from the theaters and video stores after a short period. If the experiment had run for a year the numbers would be much higher. We have to look at the lifespan of the distribution and the possibility of actually having people find the film online, as opposed to 5 years ago when there was no alternative.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We have to embrace this new era of no Gatekeepers who can decide the fate and life of you and your movie. Now we are empowered as filmmakers to have our own distribution and make money while we are sleeping.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With Social Media, marketing and sales is possible for the even smallest production company.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Stop focusing on the small picture and see this in the great context of possibilities that now exists for filmmakers globally. Remember the film was only available on YouTube in the US. There is a whole world out there, America is still only 300 million people as opposed to more than 6 billion worldwide&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe this is the best time ever to be a filmmaker. Never has equipment been cheaper and distribution easier and dont get me started on Crowdfunding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Check out http://www.ageofstupid.net/money and MyMillionDollarMovie.com are great examples on Crowdfunding for films and how it is possible to raise funding for films in this digital edge.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can watch my presentation on VOD, Social Media &amp; Crowdfunding for free on Itunes http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=342575704&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;of if you dont have Itunes click here http://festivaldarlings.23video.com/video/526600/vod-and-what-it-means-to-the&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thomas Mai 
www.MicroMajor.com&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont believe that the YouTube &#8220;Experiment&#8221; was a failure. It only ran for 10 days and proved there was a demand however small. For an independent producer this can become yet another revenue stream and it can all add up to bigger bucks when you gather up another possible angle of income.</p>
<p>We are so used to think exclusivity, please start to think non-exclusivity.</p>
<p>Now it is possible for a producer to make a deal themselves with no expensive middleman and have their film online at multiple online retailers like Itunes, NetFlix, Amazon, TheAuteurs, Youtube etc, the more the merrier.</p>
<p>Sundance title Back AssWards became the most sold film on Itunes on the indie section during Sundance see with 289 downloads after 2 days see <a href="http://sydneysbuzz.blogspot.com/2010/02/releasing-on-digital-platforms-first.html" rel="nofollow">http://sydneysbuzz.blogspot.com/2010/02/releasing-on-digital-platforms-first.html</a></p>
<p>We are talking about small films here not major block busters. This is not Avatar but independent films who can now have longevity and stay online instead of being yanked from the theaters and video stores after a short period. If the experiment had run for a year the numbers would be much higher. We have to look at the lifespan of the distribution and the possibility of actually having people find the film online, as opposed to 5 years ago when there was no alternative.</p>
<p>We have to embrace this new era of no Gatekeepers who can decide the fate and life of you and your movie. Now we are empowered as filmmakers to have our own distribution and make money while we are sleeping.</p>
<p>With Social Media, marketing and sales is possible for the even smallest production company.</p>
<p>Stop focusing on the small picture and see this in the great context of possibilities that now exists for filmmakers globally. Remember the film was only available on YouTube in the US. There is a whole world out there, America is still only 300 million people as opposed to more than 6 billion worldwide</p>
<p>I believe this is the best time ever to be a filmmaker. Never has equipment been cheaper and distribution easier and dont get me started on Crowdfunding.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.ageofstupid.net/money" rel="nofollow">http://www.ageofstupid.net/money</a> and MyMillionDollarMovie.com are great examples on Crowdfunding for films and how it is possible to raise funding for films in this digital edge.</p>
<p>You can watch my presentation on VOD, Social Media &amp; Crowdfunding for free on Itunes <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=342575704" rel="nofollow">http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=342575704</a></p>
<p>of if you dont have Itunes click here <a href="http://festivaldarlings.23video.com/video/526600/vod-and-what-it-means-to-the" rel="nofollow">http://festivaldarlings.23video.com/video/526600/vod-and-what-it-means-to-the</a></p>
<p>Thomas Mai<br />
<a href="http://www.MicroMajor.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MicroMajor.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vidli vs. Youtube &#8211; How David Will Kill Goliath</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vidli vs. Youtube &#8211; How David Will Kill Goliath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] would expect a lot more flexibility. “Rental” feels like the wrong model in UI like this&#8221; (Source) Dan Rayburn -  &#8220;Licensing premium content is only going to make YouTube lose even more [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would expect a lot more flexibility. “Rental” feels like the wrong model in UI like this&#8221; (Source) Dan Rayburn -  &#8220;Licensing premium content is only going to make YouTube lose even more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Digest for January 31st &#124; Blogonandon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weekly Digest for January 31st &#124; Blogonandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] YouTube Users Pass on Paying for Movies [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube Users Pass on Paying for Movies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Hard To Find</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[So Hard To Find]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;PS thanks for THIS site - as it was the one I finally found to link to the movies. I have passed it on!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS thanks for THIS site &#8211; as it was the one I finally found to link to the movies. I have passed it on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Hard To Find</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[So Hard To Find]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Something REALLY important to acknowledge is how ridiculously hard it is to even find these films on youtube. Many ppl have critiqued this. They needed a 12 year old to add some meta-tags or something. you&#039;d think googling or youtubing basic words like sundance films 2010 (and variations) would help. for real, it is an embarrassment that I hope turns into a learning lesson. so to use the numbers as any indication of what people pay for is lacking stats... the megaphone was clearly in the OFF position. It is seriously like trying to find a needle in a haystack - even the Sundance YouTube channel does not have the info or it is buried deep. NOR does their website!! AND to add insult to insult, the info on the movies themselves does not even link to other movies... just a real bad debut. But something they could fix... my little niece needs a job for some candy. Peace.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something REALLY important to acknowledge is how ridiculously hard it is to even find these films on youtube. Many ppl have critiqued this. They needed a 12 year old to add some meta-tags or something. you&#8217;d think googling or youtubing basic words like sundance films 2010 (and variations) would help. for real, it is an embarrassment that I hope turns into a learning lesson. so to use the numbers as any indication of what people pay for is lacking stats&#8230; the megaphone was clearly in the OFF position. It is seriously like trying to find a needle in a haystack &#8211; even the Sundance YouTube channel does not have the info or it is buried deep. NOR does their website!! AND to add insult to insult, the info on the movies themselves does not even link to other movies&#8230; just a real bad debut. But something they could fix&#8230; my little niece needs a job for some candy. Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Re: YouTube Users Pass on Paying for Movies &#187; Gubatron.com &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-users-pass-on-paying-for-movies/#comment-480417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Re: YouTube Users Pass on Paying for Movies &#187; Gubatron.com &#187; Blog Archive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=40700#comment-480417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Dear Ryan here&#8217;s my response to your piece on YouTube Users Passing on movie rentals [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dear Ryan here&#8217;s my response to your piece on YouTube Users Passing on movie rentals [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

