<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Is Missing a Golden Video Search Opportunity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-is-missing-a-golden-video-search-opportunity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-is-missing-a-golden-video-search-opportunity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Infrastructure Costs Vastly Overestimated: Report</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-is-missing-a-golden-video-search-opportunity/#comment-469638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Infrastructure Costs Vastly Overestimated: Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=20542#comment-469638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] conniving sounds a bit too much like a conspiracy theory. But we&#8217;ve seen via YouTube&#8217;s growth as a search engine how the site relates back to Google&#8217;s core business. Perhaps it fits neatly into the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conniving sounds a bit too much like a conspiracy theory. But we&#8217;ve seen via YouTube&#8217;s growth as a search engine how the site relates back to Google&#8217;s core business. Perhaps it fits neatly into the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: internet tv</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-is-missing-a-golden-video-search-opportunity/#comment-469637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[internet tv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=20542#comment-469637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Its a brilliant concept and would defo improve Youtube.
As far as i can see the one thing missing from online tv is a single source where you can get to look at anything on the net&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a brilliant concept and would defo improve Youtube.<br />
As far as i can see the one thing missing from online tv is a single source where you can get to look at anything on the net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-is-missing-a-golden-video-search-opportunity/#comment-469636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=20542#comment-469636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree--this would be smart and would fit in with the Google &quot;ethos&quot; of helping people find relevant things they are searching for, independent of who owns the site.  It&#039;s funny though, because it makes perfect sense to do this, but I have never thought about this before when I&#039;ve been on youtube.  Most other video sites aggregate content or let you access videos from other sites, but when I go to youtube I sort of figure that everything is going to be uploaded there anyway even from other sites.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe they&#039;re worried about diluting the youtube brand.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8211;this would be smart and would fit in with the Google &#8220;ethos&#8221; of helping people find relevant things they are searching for, independent of who owns the site.  It&#8217;s funny though, because it makes perfect sense to do this, but I have never thought about this before when I&#8217;ve been on youtube.  Most other video sites aggregate content or let you access videos from other sites, but when I go to youtube I sort of figure that everything is going to be uploaded there anyway even from other sites.</p>
<p>Maybe they&#8217;re worried about diluting the youtube brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankp316</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-is-missing-a-golden-video-search-opportunity/#comment-469635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frankp316]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=20542#comment-469635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve looked at all of them. The best one is AOL&#039;s Truveo video search site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.truveo.com/&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve looked at all of them. The best one is AOL&#8217;s Truveo video search site.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.truveo.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.truveo.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trypu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-is-missing-a-golden-video-search-opportunity/#comment-469634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trypu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=20542#comment-469634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;all in one search engine&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://trypu.com&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all in one search engine</p>
<p><a href="http://trypu.com" rel="nofollow">http://trypu.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: URRIGHT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-is-missing-a-golden-video-search-opportunity/#comment-469633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[URRIGHT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=20542#comment-469633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;What a brilliant idea! YouTube as a web video search portal would make enormous sense. I tried out the other companies you have mentioned doing web video search. VideoSurf, CastTV, and Blinkx are excellent. The rest seem to be so-so and don&#039;t seem to have any advantage over Google video even from a user experience perspective. But even the good ones don&#039;t stand a chance against Google I would think. That brand name is so powerful. Users come there for all kinds of search and video search is just an extension. You should also take into account that Google&#039;s standard search includes video results that get clicked on...which the comScore metric may be completely missing.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a brilliant idea! YouTube as a web video search portal would make enormous sense. I tried out the other companies you have mentioned doing web video search. VideoSurf, CastTV, and Blinkx are excellent. The rest seem to be so-so and don&#8217;t seem to have any advantage over Google video even from a user experience perspective. But even the good ones don&#8217;t stand a chance against Google I would think. That brand name is so powerful. Users come there for all kinds of search and video search is just an extension. You should also take into account that Google&#8217;s standard search includes video results that get clicked on&#8230;which the comScore metric may be completely missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terris Rendon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-is-missing-a-golden-video-search-opportunity/#comment-469632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terris Rendon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=20542#comment-469632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Google already has a video search engine. Do you suggest that they move their search for videos to youtube ?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google already has a video search engine. Do you suggest that they move their search for videos to youtube ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

