<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Accuses Viacom of Uploading Clips, Making Its Life Difficult</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Wins Viacom Court Case</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/#comment-482178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Wins Viacom Court Case]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=44142#comment-482178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Both sides had filed motions for summary judgment in March, which is essentially a way to expedite the court case without going to a jury. YouTube had once again invoked protection under the DMCA’s Safe Harbor provisions in its filing, and the court apparently agreed. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Both sides had filed motions for summary judgment in March, which is essentially a way to expedite the court case without going to a jury. YouTube had once again invoked protection under the DMCA’s Safe Harbor provisions in its filing, and the court apparently agreed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollywood Backs Viacom in YouTube Case</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/#comment-482177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hollywood Backs Viacom in YouTube Case]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=44142#comment-482177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] studios Walt Disney, NBC Universal and Warner Bros., has filed an amicus brief that argues against YouTube&#8217;s defense in the long-running copyright infringement [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] studios Walt Disney, NBC Universal and Warner Bros., has filed an amicus brief that argues against YouTube&#8217;s defense in the long-running copyright infringement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viacom: Google Used Piracy for Profit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/#comment-482176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viacom: Google Used Piracy for Profit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=44142#comment-482176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] ignored obvious copyright infringement. Meanwhile, Google accused Viacom of having its employees pose as normal users to upload promotional content to the video-sharing [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ignored obvious copyright infringement. Meanwhile, Google accused Viacom of having its employees pose as normal users to upload promotional content to the video-sharing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Much Did It Cost to Start YouTube?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/#comment-482175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Much Did It Cost to Start YouTube?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=44142#comment-482175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] As of this week we know, thanks to confidential Profit and loss information released as part of filings that have been made public in the copyright infringement case between Viacom and [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As of this week we know, thanks to confidential Profit and loss information released as part of filings that have been made public in the copyright infringement case between Viacom and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viacom: Google, YouTube Founders Willfully Ignored Infringement &#124; AniChaos.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/#comment-482174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viacom: Google, YouTube Founders Willfully Ignored Infringement &#124; AniChaos.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=44142#comment-482174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] suit between Viacom and YouTube, we&#8217;ve seen the video share site argue that it is not liable for infringing videos uploaded to its site, as it claims protection under the safe harbor provision of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suit between Viacom and YouTube, we&#8217;ve seen the video share site argue that it is not liable for infringing videos uploaded to its site, as it claims protection under the safe harbor provision of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viacom: Google, YouTube Founders Willfully Ignored Infringement &#124; Yooxe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/#comment-482173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viacom: Google, YouTube Founders Willfully Ignored Infringement &#124; Yooxe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=44142#comment-482173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] suit between Viacom and YouTube, we&#8217;ve seen the video share site argue that it is not liable for infringing videos uploaded to its site, as it claims protection under the safe harbor provision of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suit between Viacom and YouTube, we&#8217;ve seen the video share site argue that it is not liable for infringing videos uploaded to its site, as it claims protection under the safe harbor provision of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viacom: Google, YouTube Founders Willfully Ignored Infringement &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/#comment-482172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viacom: Google, YouTube Founders Willfully Ignored Infringement &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=44142#comment-482172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] suit between Viacom and YouTube, we&#8217;ve seen the video share site argue that it is not liable for infringing videos uploaded to its site, as it claims protection under the safe harbor provision of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suit between Viacom and YouTube, we&#8217;ve seen the video share site argue that it is not liable for infringing videos uploaded to its site, as it claims protection under the safe harbor provision of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viacom: Google, YouTube Founders Willfully Ignored Infringement</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/#comment-482171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viacom: Google, YouTube Founders Willfully Ignored Infringement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=44142#comment-482171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] suit between Viacom and YouTube, we&#8217;ve seen the video share site argue that it is not liable for infringing videos uploaded to its site, as it claims protection under the safe harbor provision of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suit between Viacom and YouTube, we&#8217;ve seen the video share site argue that it is not liable for infringing videos uploaded to its site, as it claims protection under the safe harbor provision of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did YouTube Jilt Viacom for Google?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/youtube-accuses-viacom-of-uploading-clips-making-its-life-difficult/#comment-482170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Did YouTube Jilt Viacom for Google?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=44142#comment-482170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] overtime to promote its parent company&#8217;s media properties. YouTube&#8217;s allegation that Viacom used YouTube as a promotional device after the Google acquisition only supports that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] overtime to promote its parent company&#8217;s media properties. YouTube&#8217;s allegation that Viacom used YouTube as a promotional device after the Google acquisition only supports that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

