<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White-Label Video Co&#8217;s: Send Your Picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaman Restructuring after Layoffs and Attrition</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaman Restructuring after Layoffs and Attrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] would consist of, but we hope it&#8217;s at least something focused on movies. This world has enough white-label video [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would consist of, but we hope it&#8217;s at least something focused on movies. This world has enough white-label video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White-Label Video Shops, Compared&#160;&#124;&#160;Viral Video Maker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[White-Label Video Shops, Compared&#160;&#124;&#160;Viral Video Maker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] promised once upon a time that we could compile a side-by-side comparison of all the white-label video [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] promised once upon a time that we could compile a side-by-side comparison of all the white-label video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White-Label Video Shops, Compared &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[White-Label Video Shops, Compared &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Video Shops,&#160;Compared  We promised once upon a time that we could compile a side-by-side comparison of all the white-label video [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Video Shops,&nbsp;Compared  We promised once upon a time that we could compile a side-by-side comparison of all the white-label video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I.R. Kramer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I.R. Kramer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;This is one of the most helpful, eye-opening posts I have seen on the topic of &quot;Who&#039;s Who&quot; in Online Video Platforms.  I appreciate the information from everyone that contributed to it.  But I would second the motion that Liz or someone provide a cost-analysis and some parameters for comparison of the variables involved.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the most helpful, eye-opening posts I have seen on the topic of &#8220;Who&#8217;s Who&#8221; in Online Video Platforms.  I appreciate the information from everyone that contributed to it.  But I would second the motion that Liz or someone provide a cost-analysis and some parameters for comparison of the variables involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personal Video Service EatLime Takes DFJ Funding &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Personal Video Service EatLime Takes DFJ Funding &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] plans, which it has since abandoned &#8212; and eventually compete with the many players in the white-label video space. Al Adham said EatLime is currently negotiating two such [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plans, which it has since abandoned &#8212; and eventually compete with the many players in the white-label video space. Al Adham said EatLime is currently negotiating two such [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 00:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Liz, it&#039;d be great if you could do a comparison article, including costs, especially for us little guys.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve done research on my own and most of the white-labels charge thousands of dollars a month to get up and running. I&#039;ve recently reached out to Twistage and Fliqz for pricing and support information. (Fliqz makes things easy by saying up front how much they charge.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you could do a comparison article, it would really help cut through all the on-line clutter.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz, it&#8217;d be great if you could do a comparison article, including costs, especially for us little guys.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done research on my own and most of the white-labels charge thousands of dollars a month to get up and running. I&#8217;ve recently reached out to Twistage and Fliqz for pricing and support information. (Fliqz makes things easy by saying up front how much they charge.)</p>
<p>If you could do a comparison article, it would really help cut through all the on-line clutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updated: Akimbo Layoffs &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Updated: Akimbo Layoffs &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] recently changed course to become a white-label video provider &#8212; the last resort for companies with failed video business [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently changed course to become a white-label video provider &#8212; the last resort for companies with failed video business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lopodj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lopodj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I want to upload my video here, How can I do it?? 
This is the link: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhKWpbjGN4g&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank youuu!!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to upload my video here, How can I do it??<br />
This is the link:<br />
<span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/NhKWpbjGN4gp/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
<p>Thank youuu!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Hurst</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Hurst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Full disclosure – I am a Co-Founder and Creative Director at 1Dawg, LLC&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I ran a user-generated video site in late 2006/early 2007. In that time we scaled to 6 Million unique connections in just under five months. The hosting requirements were outrageously expensive for the bootstrapped start-up we were at that time. During the early part of 2007 there was a lot of speculation regarding monetization possibilities for video startups. Google was being dominated by the press with regards to how YouTube was “a bad investment”, video advertising networks didn’t exist yet, and with the recent 1B lawsuit Viacom had slapped on Google; most of the Venture guys crawled into their corners terrified of the DMCA.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I decided to start white-labeling for one reason: I knew my technology was viable, but I needed other people to risk the investment dollars. 
When I say “white-label”, I think of a completely branded solution customized to my client’s discretion. The uniqueness in my technology is the fact that we transcode from every known video file format, can customize conversion based on bitrate/resolution and focus on the mobile device market. We believe that 3rd screen is where it’s at. The exact reason why 75% of the users that visited my UGC site were downloading content for iPods, Cell Phones, Zunes, etc. We were also the first user-generated video site to send video on-demand to mobile phones.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I run a boutique firm. We don’t advertise much and we haven’t gotten much press. We have been bootstrapped from the beginning and have a very happy client base. Most of my client’s are based off of referrals. My ideal customer is a startup that would like us to take over their entire IT department. We handle everything from U.I. design to viral marketing. We aren’t just a video distribution platform. We are a full service website design and software development company that just happens to possess a proprietary video transcoding solution. We shave off the 8-12 months of development time and get clients to market in a very short while. Our clients tell us what they want on their sites:  social features, video marketplaces, crazy ad systems, etc. We look at every client separately and deliver a stable solution that we guarantee will scale. Our solution isn’t right for everyone, but we have proven to be reliable for a number of companies and we love what we do.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The whole idea behind utilizing white-label solutions is to speed up market timing, yet keep the home-grown image. If anyone is interested in chatting about the online video space, I am happy to answer questions. My direct e-mail is: zhurst (at) gmail&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you are interested in watching a short screen cast of the technology in action, please follow this link:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.1dawgscreencast.com&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p><strong>Full disclosure – I am a Co-Founder and Creative Director at 1Dawg, LLC</strong></p>
<p>I ran a user-generated video site in late 2006/early 2007. In that time we scaled to 6 Million unique connections in just under five months. The hosting requirements were outrageously expensive for the bootstrapped start-up we were at that time. During the early part of 2007 there was a lot of speculation regarding monetization possibilities for video startups. Google was being dominated by the press with regards to how YouTube was “a bad investment”, video advertising networks didn’t exist yet, and with the recent 1B lawsuit Viacom had slapped on Google; most of the Venture guys crawled into their corners terrified of the DMCA.</p>
<p>I decided to start white-labeling for one reason: I knew my technology was viable, but I needed other people to risk the investment dollars.<br />
When I say “white-label”, I think of a completely branded solution customized to my client’s discretion. The uniqueness in my technology is the fact that we transcode from every known video file format, can customize conversion based on bitrate/resolution and focus on the mobile device market. We believe that 3rd screen is where it’s at. The exact reason why 75% of the users that visited my UGC site were downloading content for iPods, Cell Phones, Zunes, etc. We were also the first user-generated video site to send video on-demand to mobile phones.</p>
<p>I run a boutique firm. We don’t advertise much and we haven’t gotten much press. We have been bootstrapped from the beginning and have a very happy client base. Most of my client’s are based off of referrals. My ideal customer is a startup that would like us to take over their entire IT department. We handle everything from U.I. design to viral marketing. We aren’t just a video distribution platform. We are a full service website design and software development company that just happens to possess a proprietary video transcoding solution. We shave off the 8-12 months of development time and get clients to market in a very short while. Our clients tell us what they want on their sites:  social features, video marketplaces, crazy ad systems, etc. We look at every client separately and deliver a stable solution that we guarantee will scale. Our solution isn’t right for everyone, but we have proven to be reliable for a number of companies and we love what we do.</p>
<p>The whole idea behind utilizing white-label solutions is to speed up market timing, yet keep the home-grown image. If anyone is interested in chatting about the online video space, I am happy to answer questions. My direct e-mail is: zhurst (at) gmail</p>
<p>If you are interested in watching a short screen cast of the technology in action, please follow this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.1dawgscreencast.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.1dawgscreencast.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy pemble</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremy pemble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Full disclosure: We are the PR firm (wait...keep reading..don&#039;t hold that against us) for thePlatform, based in Seattle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hundreds of professional media companies rely on thePlatform to manage billions of videos every year.  thePlatform’s system manages the entire logistics process behind the publication of broadband video from the content owner to the consumer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Media companies and video sites rely on thePlatform’s services to manage their media, generate revenue from their content, syndicate media to outlets and create unique broadband video players.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some customers include BBC, CNBC, CBS’s College Sports TV, Comcast, Corus Entertainment, Gannett, Helio, HIT Entertainment, PBS KIDS Sprout, Sony BMG, The Hearst Corporation, Verizon Wireless, Vongo, and numerous other undisclosed media companies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thePlatform also has the largest collection of pre-integrated partner technologies and an open approach for assisting media companies with their online and mobile video initiatives.  Partners involved in thePlatform&#039;s Framework (partner program) include:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Advertising &amp; Monetization
• Adap.TV 
• BlackArrow
• CSG Systems
• DoubleClick
• Lightningcast
• Panache
• PayPal
• ScanScout
• SpotXchange&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Content Delivery 
• Akamai
• BitGravity
• Cisco Systems
• Edgecast Networks
• GridNetworks
• Highwinds
• Internap
• Limelight Networks
• MediaMelon
• OnStream Media&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Playback Experience
• Apple Corp.
• Adobe Systems
• Microsoft Corp.
• Move Networks&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Transcoding
• Digital Rapids
• On2
• Rhozet
• RipCode
• Telestream&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Content Syndication 
• AT&amp;T
• Clearspring
• Comcast.net
• GoTV
• iTunes Podcasts
• MobiTV
• MSN Video
• Sprint
• Verizon Wireless
• Yahoo
• YouTube&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Professional Services
• Ascertane
• Cypress Consulting
• Genex
• Online Video Service
• Schematic&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Digital Asset Management
• ClearStory Systems
• North Plains Systems&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Content Protection
• Microsoft Corp.
• Widevine Technologies&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Technology companies interested in participating in thePlatform Framework and utilizing its application programming interface (API) should check us out at www.thePlatform.com.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full disclosure: We are the PR firm (wait&#8230;keep reading..don&#8217;t hold that against us) for thePlatform, based in Seattle.</p>
<p>Hundreds of professional media companies rely on thePlatform to manage billions of videos every year.  thePlatform’s system manages the entire logistics process behind the publication of broadband video from the content owner to the consumer.</p>
<p>Media companies and video sites rely on thePlatform’s services to manage their media, generate revenue from their content, syndicate media to outlets and create unique broadband video players.</p>
<p>Some customers include BBC, CNBC, CBS’s College Sports TV, Comcast, Corus Entertainment, Gannett, Helio, HIT Entertainment, PBS KIDS Sprout, Sony BMG, The Hearst Corporation, Verizon Wireless, Vongo, and numerous other undisclosed media companies.</p>
<p>thePlatform also has the largest collection of pre-integrated partner technologies and an open approach for assisting media companies with their online and mobile video initiatives.  Partners involved in thePlatform&#8217;s Framework (partner program) include:</p>
<p>Advertising &amp; Monetization<br />
• Adap.TV<br />
• BlackArrow<br />
• CSG Systems<br />
• DoubleClick<br />
• Lightningcast<br />
• Panache<br />
• PayPal<br />
• ScanScout<br />
• SpotXchange</p>
<p>Content Delivery<br />
• Akamai<br />
• BitGravity<br />
• Cisco Systems<br />
• Edgecast Networks<br />
• GridNetworks<br />
• Highwinds<br />
• Internap<br />
• Limelight Networks<br />
• MediaMelon<br />
• OnStream Media</p>
<p>Playback Experience<br />
• Apple Corp.<br />
• Adobe Systems<br />
• Microsoft Corp.<br />
• Move Networks</p>
<p>Transcoding<br />
• Digital Rapids<br />
• On2<br />
• Rhozet<br />
• RipCode<br />
• Telestream</p>
<p>Content Syndication<br />
• AT&amp;T<br />
• Clearspring<br />
• Comcast.net<br />
• GoTV<br />
• iTunes Podcasts<br />
• MobiTV<br />
• MSN Video<br />
• Sprint<br />
• Verizon Wireless<br />
• Yahoo<br />
• YouTube</p>
<p>Professional Services<br />
• Ascertane<br />
• Cypress Consulting<br />
• Genex<br />
• Online Video Service<br />
• Schematic</p>
<p>Digital Asset Management<br />
• ClearStory Systems<br />
• North Plains Systems</p>
<p>Content Protection<br />
• Microsoft Corp.<br />
• Widevine Technologies</p>
<p>Technology companies interested in participating in thePlatform Framework and utilizing its application programming interface (API) should check us out at <a href="http://www.thePlatform.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thePlatform.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Wilson Gyetvan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angela Wilson Gyetvan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi, Liz:  Revver pioneered this space by offering our open API nearly two years ago.  Our users include Nine MSN&#039;s &quot;Your Cut&quot; in Australia (entire site powered by Revver), Best Motoring&#039;s GT Channel, and Crash.tv.  We just this week released a new Flash API for enhanced applications.   And we remain the only open, free and fully-customizable solution that also lets you monetize all your video content.  Oh, and no watermarks.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Liz:  Revver pioneered this space by offering our open API nearly two years ago.  Our users include Nine MSN&#8217;s &#8220;Your Cut&#8221; in Australia (entire site powered by Revver), Best Motoring&#8217;s GT Channel, and Crash.tv.  We just this week released a new Flash API for enhanced applications.   And we remain the only open, free and fully-customizable solution that also lets you monetize all your video content.  Oh, and no watermarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Bennett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I work at Kaltura - Kaltura offers a full platform that supports basic and advanced online video capabilities including: video creation &amp; management, interaction &amp; collaboration, advertising &amp; monetizing, as well as membership to the Kaltura Network of sharable rich-media content.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In a nutshell, I’d say that our key differentiators are: 
-   Our platform is open-source, and therefore widely supported and inexpensive
-   Our technology is geared towards high degrees of collaboration and interaction allowing sites to significantly increase user engagement
-   Our platform is easy to install - adding interactive video to a site takes minutes not days or weeks using the extensions to popular web platforms and reference implementations in PHP and Ruby.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Check out www.kaltura.com to learn more.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work at Kaltura &#8211; Kaltura offers a full platform that supports basic and advanced online video capabilities including: video creation &amp; management, interaction &amp; collaboration, advertising &amp; monetizing, as well as membership to the Kaltura Network of sharable rich-media content.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, I’d say that our key differentiators are:<br />
-   Our platform is open-source, and therefore widely supported and inexpensive<br />
-   Our technology is geared towards high degrees of collaboration and interaction allowing sites to significantly increase user engagement<br />
-   Our platform is easy to install &#8211; adding interactive video to a site takes minutes not days or weeks using the extensions to popular web platforms and reference implementations in PHP and Ruby.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.kaltura.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.kaltura.com</a> to learn more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll second Twistage. They&#039;ve been a great solution for the sites I work on. Very much a true white label, with an API that our developers have been happy with, and providing many transcoding features on the server-side that other providers forced me to do on my own. Our integration with Drupal has proven quite easy. I should also say they&#039;ve been great to work with, custom building iTunes/podcast features at my request. The quality of the transcodes, and a good set of features that falls between building from scratch and a more canned service are the killers for me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Other services I&#039;ve used are Brightcove, Vimeo, blip.tv, and YouTube. As a consumer choice I love Vimeo, and use it for all my personal projects. Brightcove&#039;s API is cumbersome, and they seem behind the curve from a technology standpoint, but they have my favorite ad-serving options. blip.tv is good, but not the best for a CMS backend, in my experience.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll second Twistage. They&#8217;ve been a great solution for the sites I work on. Very much a true white label, with an API that our developers have been happy with, and providing many transcoding features on the server-side that other providers forced me to do on my own. Our integration with Drupal has proven quite easy. I should also say they&#8217;ve been great to work with, custom building iTunes/podcast features at my request. The quality of the transcodes, and a good set of features that falls between building from scratch and a more canned service are the killers for me.</p>
<p>Other services I&#8217;ve used are Brightcove, Vimeo, blip.tv, and YouTube. As a consumer choice I love Vimeo, and use it for all my personal projects. Brightcove&#8217;s API is cumbersome, and they seem behind the curve from a technology standpoint, but they have my favorite ad-serving options. blip.tv is good, but not the best for a CMS backend, in my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I have been using Twistage since my site launch last September and they have been superb. The API is simple to implement and the performance is great. The pricing is very good and structured to help both big and small volume equally well. One of their best attributes though is their support - no problem is too difficult and no question too simple - the guys are friendly and helpful beyond what is expected - they truely are a breath of fresh air.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Twistage since my site launch last September and they have been superb. The API is simple to implement and the performance is great. The pricing is very good and structured to help both big and small volume equally well. One of their best attributes though is their support &#8211; no problem is too difficult and no question too simple &#8211; the guys are friendly and helpful beyond what is expected &#8211; they truely are a breath of fresh air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rosenbaum</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Rosenbaum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hmm... well,  &quot;White-Label&quot;  isn&#039;t what we&#039;re about... but it seems like this is more of a group of platforms and video players... so i&#039;ll throw our hat in the ring.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Magnify&#039;s view is the video is a &#039;spark plug&#039;  that creates community engagement,  discussion,  and participation.  So a player is just that - part of a solution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The good news is this isn&#039;t a &#039;one size fits all&#039; problem,  so there&#039;s room for a number of solutions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We&#039;re very excited about the 32,000 sites that are using Magnify.net to solve a suite of 4 problems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Video Discovery.  Not all sites want to make video, or count on visitors to upload,  so being able to find and automatically aggregate and update a dynamic video collection is pretty cool.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Video Hosting.   Sure, your visitors want to upload - and you want to make sure you own (and control) those videos.  After all submitted content should be special in your community.  Magnify Upload is rock solid and free.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Content Management (CMS).  This means page layout,  rss integration,  search,  curation,  peer review,  meta-data management,  trouble reports,  DMCA compliance,  widget integration,  webcam uploads and more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ad Serving.  Once you&#039;ve found video,  uploaded video,  created video pages,  and provided traffic - then you need an ad server that can turn those pages into revenue for you - using your ad network relationships.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh,  and then there&#039;s member management.  Profiles,  Reputation System,  Opt-In friend lists,  Member email blasts,  and management of community standards (including approval of comments and reviews if you wish).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Offering a suite of community-centric video services is a great place for us to be.  Fast moving,  fun,  but not really &quot;white label&quot;  more like a &#039;software as a service&#039; platform - with a free as our base product.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking for more feature and ways to build on Magnify.net?  Stay tuned :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Steve Rosenbaum
CEO
Magnify.net&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; well,  &#8220;White-Label&#8221;  isn&#8217;t what we&#8217;re about&#8230; but it seems like this is more of a group of platforms and video players&#8230; so i&#8217;ll throw our hat in the ring.</p>
<p>Magnify&#8217;s view is the video is a &#8216;spark plug&#8217;  that creates community engagement,  discussion,  and participation.  So a player is just that &#8211; part of a solution.</p>
<p>The good news is this isn&#8217;t a &#8216;one size fits all&#8217; problem,  so there&#8217;s room for a number of solutions.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re very excited about the 32,000 sites that are using Magnify.net to solve a suite of 4 problems.</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p>Video Discovery.  Not all sites want to make video, or count on visitors to upload,  so being able to find and automatically aggregate and update a dynamic video collection is pretty cool.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Video Hosting.   Sure, your visitors want to upload &#8211; and you want to make sure you own (and control) those videos.  After all submitted content should be special in your community.  Magnify Upload is rock solid and free.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Content Management (CMS).  This means page layout,  rss integration,  search,  curation,  peer review,  meta-data management,  trouble reports,  DMCA compliance,  widget integration,  webcam uploads and more.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Ad Serving.  Once you&#8217;ve found video,  uploaded video,  created video pages,  and provided traffic &#8211; then you need an ad server that can turn those pages into revenue for you &#8211; using your ad network relationships.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>Oh,  and then there&#8217;s member management.  Profiles,  Reputation System,  Opt-In friend lists,  Member email blasts,  and management of community standards (including approval of comments and reviews if you wish).</p>
<p>Offering a suite of community-centric video services is a great place for us to be.  Fast moving,  fun,  but not really &#8220;white label&#8221;  more like a &#8216;software as a service&#8217; platform &#8211; with a free as our base product.</p>
<p>Looking for more feature and ways to build on Magnify.net?  Stay tuned :)</p>
<p>Steve Rosenbaum<br />
CEO<br />
Magnify.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dude</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/white-label-video-cos-send-your-picks/#comment-455700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3383#comment-455700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The thing about white label video sites is that most either just give you framework or just give you a player and few give framework plus hosting. Small clients have sites that they cant monetize and only last maybe a year, and most larger clients hire one of these brands as an addition to their in-house CMS.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While this is a nice little service, the real quality is a company that can come and service all of your video hosting, framework and ALL social networking capabilities in one CMS. Reality Digital&#039;s Opus platform is unbeatable. They&#039;re releasing Opus2 soon which will stand out in this emerging market with tons of new features that will further solidify their stance on top of the market in the big boy arena.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Clients: Viacom, Adobe, Hearst, Fox, Comedy Central, MLB, Travel Channel, MTV, VH1&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about white label video sites is that most either just give you framework or just give you a player and few give framework plus hosting. Small clients have sites that they cant monetize and only last maybe a year, and most larger clients hire one of these brands as an addition to their in-house CMS.</p>
<p>While this is a nice little service, the real quality is a company that can come and service all of your video hosting, framework and ALL social networking capabilities in one CMS. Reality Digital&#8217;s Opus platform is unbeatable. They&#8217;re releasing Opus2 soon which will stand out in this emerging market with tons of new features that will further solidify their stance on top of the market in the big boy arena.</p>
<p>Clients: Viacom, Adobe, Hearst, Fox, Comedy Central, MLB, Travel Channel, MTV, VH1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

