<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Veoh&#8217;s Court Victory Means for Online Video Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/what-veohs-court-victory-means-for-online-video-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-veohs-court-victory-means-for-online-video-sites/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EMI/Vimeo Lawsuit Leaves Lip-Dubbers Speechless &#171; Media and Communications Law Society</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-veohs-court-victory-means-for-online-video-sites/#comment-475955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EMI/Vimeo Lawsuit Leaves Lip-Dubbers Speechless &#171; Media and Communications Law Society]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=31523#comment-475955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] of that infringement. That awareness is important because it could distinguish this case froma similar one against Veoh.com, in which that video-sharing site found protection under the Digital Millennium Copyright [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of that infringement. That awareness is important because it could distinguish this case froma similar one against Veoh.com, in which that video-sharing site found protection under the Digital Millennium Copyright [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital Records Suing Vimeo Over Dub Videos &#124; InfoAddict</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-veohs-court-victory-means-for-online-video-sites/#comment-475954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capital Records Suing Vimeo Over Dub Videos &#124; InfoAddict]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=31523#comment-475954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] this year, Universal Music Group lost a copyright infringement suit against another video-sharing site, Veoh. It claimed that Vimeo Veoh didn’t do enough to protect [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year, Universal Music Group lost a copyright infringement suit against another video-sharing site, Veoh. It claimed that Vimeo Veoh didn’t do enough to protect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vimeo Gets Sued for Lip-Syncing? &#124; Nicolas Hesson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-veohs-court-victory-means-for-online-video-sites/#comment-475953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vimeo Gets Sued for Lip-Syncing? &#124; Nicolas Hesson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=31523#comment-475953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] this year, Universal Music Group lost a copyright infringement suit against another video-sharing site, Veoh. It claimed that Vimeo didn’t do enough to protect [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year, Universal Music Group lost a copyright infringement suit against another video-sharing site, Veoh. It claimed that Vimeo didn’t do enough to protect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vimeo Sued Over Lip Dubs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-veohs-court-victory-means-for-online-video-sites/#comment-475952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vimeo Sued Over Lip Dubs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=31523#comment-475952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] this year, Universal Music Group lost a copyright infringement suit against another video-sharing site, Veoh. It claimed that Vimeo didn&#8217;t do enough to protect [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year, Universal Music Group lost a copyright infringement suit against another video-sharing site, Veoh. It claimed that Vimeo didn&#8217;t do enough to protect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Cohen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-veohs-court-victory-means-for-online-video-sites/#comment-475951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=31523#comment-475951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Nice wrapup Liz.  Helpful.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice wrapup Liz.  Helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakir Razak</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-veohs-court-victory-means-for-online-video-sites/#comment-475950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shakir Razak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=31523#comment-475950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t care how unfashionable it sounds, I believe there will be more players, as the Internet in general matures (and as long as they can survive beyond the downturn), to allow for at least Veoh, Dailymotion and MetaCafe to exist as an adjunct to YT, plus local equivalents, alongside the Hulu (producer-owned aggregating) types and direct Network Sites; Maybe, even with access windows the way they exist from Cinema via HBO to Network TV (The long tail versus speed, personalisation/value and quality).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I could write a lot more about that, as well as other tools for discovery like Setjam being available and how after 5 years Facebook only has 300m users and overlap with other Soc.Nets , et al.!!!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, The most interesting consequences of this judgement, and which might involve a conflict of an industry peer against it&#039;s own industry (re: YT supporting UMG taking legal action) would be the leverage and negotiating position between Vivo/YT and the other music-majors, and companies like CBS/Viacom that have had a very open content-distribution strategy in the context of supporting anyone but YT.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shakir Razak&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care how unfashionable it sounds, I believe there will be more players, as the Internet in general matures (and as long as they can survive beyond the downturn), to allow for at least Veoh, Dailymotion and MetaCafe to exist as an adjunct to YT, plus local equivalents, alongside the Hulu (producer-owned aggregating) types and direct Network Sites; Maybe, even with access windows the way they exist from Cinema via HBO to Network TV (The long tail versus speed, personalisation/value and quality).</p>
<p>I could write a lot more about that, as well as other tools for discovery like Setjam being available and how after 5 years Facebook only has 300m users and overlap with other Soc.Nets , et al.!!!!</p>
<p>However, The most interesting consequences of this judgement, and which might involve a conflict of an industry peer against it&#8217;s own industry (re: YT supporting UMG taking legal action) would be the leverage and negotiating position between Vivo/YT and the other music-majors, and companies like CBS/Viacom that have had a very open content-distribution strategy in the context of supporting anyone but YT.</p>
<p>Kind regards,</p>
<p>Shakir Razak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

