<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Steve Said: &#8220;HD&#8221; vs. &#8220;High Quality&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:36:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Finalmente em Alta Definição (720p) &#171; Azougado&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Finalmente em Alta Definição (720p) &#171; Azougado&#8217;s Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] estarão realmente dentro de padrões da Alta Definição (720p/1080i), que caso lhe interesse pode ler mais aqui, não há dúvida, que o conteúdo em AD tem uma qualidade de imagem extremamente superior, sendo [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] estarão realmente dentro de padrões da Alta Definição (720p/1080i), que caso lhe interesse pode ler mais aqui, não há dúvida, que o conteúdo em AD tem uma qualidade de imagem extremamente superior, sendo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conte&#250;do HD no YouTube &#124; bernabauer.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conte&#250;do HD no YouTube &#124; bernabauer.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ser HD, o v&#237;deo em si parece n&#227;o ser HD ao p&#233; da letra. Ele &#233; consideravelmente melhor do que o High-Quality, mas n&#227;o &#233; [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ser HD, o v&iacute;deo em si parece n&atilde;o ser HD ao p&eacute; da letra. Ele &eacute; consideravelmente melhor do que o High-Quality, mas n&atilde;o &eacute; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Goes HD Gains Viewers But Loses in Market &#124; Driven To Nvizion Life</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Goes HD Gains Viewers But Loses in Market &#124; Driven To Nvizion Life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] talk about going HD has been going on just about forever with YouTube and there were even some workarounds possible. Now users don&#8217;t have to add or do [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talk about going HD has been going on just about forever with YouTube and there were even some workarounds possible. Now users don&#8217;t have to add or do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Finalmente em Alta Defini&#231;&#227;o (720p) &#171; Casa Tuga</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Finalmente em Alta Defini&#231;&#227;o (720p) &#171; Casa Tuga]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] estarão realmente dentro de padrões da Alta Definição (720p/1080i), que caso lhe interesse pode ler mais aqui, não há dúvida, que o conteúdo em AD tem uma qualidade de imagem extremamente superior, sendo [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] estarão realmente dentro de padrões da Alta Definição (720p/1080i), que caso lhe interesse pode ler mais aqui, não há dúvida, que o conteúdo em AD tem uma qualidade de imagem extremamente superior, sendo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube diventa HD (più o meno) - Gizmodo IT - Il gadget weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube diventa HD (più o meno) - Gizmodo IT - Il gadget weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] o no lo standard minimo dell&#8217;HD di 720p/1080i, e potete leggere l&#8217;intera controversia a questo indirizzo, se vi interessa approfondire la questione. Ma non c&#8217;è alcun dubbio che i contenuti di [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] o no lo standard minimo dell&#8217;HD di 720p/1080i, e potete leggere l&#8217;intera controversia a questo indirizzo, se vi interessa approfondire la questione. Ma non c&#8217;è alcun dubbio che i contenuti di [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube devient &#8220;HD&#8221; - Gizmodo - Tant d'amour pour ces fabuleux nouveaux gadgets, c'est surnaturel.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube devient &#8220;HD&#8221; - Gizmodo - Tant d'amour pour ces fabuleux nouveaux gadgets, c'est surnaturel.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] si la norme minimale 720p/1080i HD était respectée, et vous pouvez lire toute la controverse ici si c&#8217;est votre tasse de thé. Mais il n&#8217;y a aucun doute sur le fait que le contenu [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] si la norme minimale 720p/1080i HD était respectée, et vous pouvez lire toute la controverse ici si c&#8217;est votre tasse de thé. Mais il n&#8217;y a aucun doute sur le fait que le contenu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Youtube Goes HD &#171; Daily News2Read 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Youtube Goes HD &#171; Daily News2Read 2.0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] meets the minimum 720p/1080i HD standard, and you can read more about that whole controversy here if that&#8217;s your sort of thing, but there&#8217;s no doubt that YouTube &#8220;HD&#8221; [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] meets the minimum 720p/1080i HD standard, and you can read more about that whole controversy here if that&#8217;s your sort of thing, but there&#8217;s no doubt that YouTube &#8220;HD&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Goes Widescreen &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Goes Widescreen &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 4:3). Seems like the site is upgrading from its accessibility-trumps-quality mantra (and no doubt hearing the drumbeat of demand for high-definition [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4:3). Seems like the site is upgrading from its accessibility-trumps-quality mantra (and no doubt hearing the drumbeat of demand for high-definition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cineteq</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cineteq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s great that YouTube has improved the quality, but you need to consider few things before encoding for higher quality.

Youtube Hi Def
http://www.squidoo.com/youtubehd
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great that YouTube has improved the quality, but you need to consider few things before encoding for higher quality.</p>
<p>Youtube Hi Def<br />
<a href="http://www.squidoo.com/youtubehd" rel="nofollow">http://www.squidoo.com/youtubehd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube&#8217;s Bumps Up Streaming Quality &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube&#8217;s Bumps Up Streaming Quality &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-451953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Chen told us at NewTeeVee Live last year that YouTube would experiment with different quality streams, depending on the user&#8217;s bandwidth. Perhaps this is the new &#8220;good enough&#8221; for [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chen told us at NewTeeVee Live last year that YouTube would experiment with different quality streams, depending on the user&#8217;s bandwidth. Perhaps this is the new &#8220;good enough&#8221; for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

